145
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      THE POLITICS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS REFORM IN NEW ZEALAND

      Published
      editorial
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      politics, policy, telecommunications, New Zealand
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This paper presents an historical account of the reforms to New Zealand's telecommunications policy which have occurred since 1986. The history is set around three stages: the period leading up to the review of the New Zealand Post Office in 1986; the corporatisation and subsequent privatisation of Telecom New Zealand in 1990; and, the implementation of the so-called ‘light-handed’ regulatory regime since 1990. This paper focuses on the period up to 1990 to address the question why telecommunications reform took place in New Zealand. It is argued that the ideological disposition of the New Zealand Treasury was very influential in determining the outcomes of the reform process. This paper also makes some observations on the broader political aspects of the reform process.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            December 1995
            : 13
            : 2
            : 248-266
            Affiliations
            Article
            8631983 Prometheus, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1995: pp. 248–266
            10.1080/08109029508631983
            e5821cdd-4cf0-414a-976d-d394641f757f
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 108, Pages: 19
            Categories
            Editorial

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            New Zealand,politics,policy,telecommunications

            NOTES AND REFERENCES

            1. See for example: Bjorn Wellenius and Peter Stern (eds), Implementing Reforms in the Telecommunications Sector: Lessons from Experience, The World Bank, Washington, 1994; Patrick McCabe, ‘New Zealand: the unique experiment in deregulation’ in Eli Noam, Seisuke Komatsuzaki and Douglas A. Conn (eds), Telecommunications in the Pacific Basin: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994, pp. 393–419; and David Gabel and William Pollard, Privatization, Deregulation, and Competition, Learning form the Cases of Telecommunications in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, Report NRRI 94–32, The National Regulatory Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA, January 1995.

            2. Herbert Dordick, ‘New Zealand: testing the limits of nonregulation’, in Eli Noam, Seisuke Komatsuzaki and Douglas A. Conn (eds), op.cit., pp. 420–439.

            3. See for example: Brian Easton, ‘The Commercialisation of the New Zealand Economy: From Think Big to Privatisation’ in B.H. Easton (ed), The Making of Rogernomics, Auckland University Press, Auckland, 1989, pp. 114–131; and Brian Easton, ‘From Rogernomics to Ruthanasia: New Right Economics in New Zealand’, in S Rees, G Rodley and F Stillwell (eds), Beyond the Market: Alternatives to Economic Rationalism, Pluto Press, Leichhardt, NSW, 1993, pp. 149–162.

            4. Mascarenhas R C. . 1991. . “‘State-Owned Enterprises’. ”. In Reshaping the State . , Edited by: Boston J., Martin J., Pallot J. and Walsh P.. p. 27––51. . Auckland : : Oxford University Press. .

            5. K Lowen, The Role of the Computer in the New Zealand Economy, Publication No 3, Contract Research Unit, New Zealand Institute of Economic Research Inc., New Zealand, 1968

            6. Wagner G. . 1984. . ‘Telecommunications policy-making in New Zealand during the last two decades’. . Telecommunications Policy . , Vol. 8((2)) June;: 107––126. .

            7. ibid., p. 113

            8. New Zealand, Communications Commission, Telecommunications in New Zealand, Report of the Communications Commission, Government Printer, Wellington, April 1977

            9. Wagner, op. cit., p. 112

            10. Stewart D and Moss L. . 1983. . “‘Communications Policy in New Zealand: Overseas Influence and Local Neglect’. ”. In Communications Policy in Developed Countries . , Edited by: Edgar P. and Rahim S.. p. 289 London : : Kegan Paul. .

            11. Sinclair K. . 1991. . A History of New Zealand . , p. 319 Auckland : : Penguin. .

            12. Stewart and Moss, op. cit., pp. 287–289

            13. S Bell, ‘Information flow advantage of group’, National Business Review, 16 September 1985, p. 72

            14. Sinclair, op. cit., p. 319

            15. ibid., p. 319

            16. Mulgan R. . 1990. . “‘The Changing Electoral Mandate’. ”. In The Fourth Labour Government . , Edited by: Holland M. and Boston J.. p. 11––21. . Auckland : : Oxford University Press. .

            17. Easton B. . 1989. . “‘Introduction’. ”. In The Making of Rogernomics . , Edited by: Easton B.. p. 8 Auckland : : Auckland University Press. .

            18. R Mulgan, op. cit., p. 15

            19. See for example M Holland and J Boston (eds), The Fourth Labour Government, op. cit.; B Easton, The Making of Rogernomics, op. cit.; and J Boston et.al. (eds), Reshaping the State, op. cit.

            20. R Mulgan, op. cit., p. 15

            21. B Easton, op. cit, p.9

            22. R Mascarenhas, op. cit., p. 31

            23. Jennings S and Cameron R. . 1987. . “‘State-Owned Enterprise Reform in New Zealand’. ”. In Economic Liberalisation in New Zealand . , Edited by: Bollard A. and Buckle R.. p. 121––152. . Auckland : : Allen and Unwin. .

            24. J Hunt (Postmaster-General), “Cutover of the Auckland-Wellington Digital Communications Link’, Speech delivered at the Kingsgate Convention Centre, Auckland, 16 November 1984

            25. S Bell. op. cit.

            26. J Hunt (Postmaster-General), ‘New Zealand Computer Society Telecommunications Conference’, speech at the Sheraton Hotel, Auckland, 24 August 1985, pp. 21–22

            27. ibid.

            28. S Bell, ‘Post Office asked to hold down packet charge’, National Business Review, 16 September 1985, p. 72

            29. J Hunt (Postmaster-General), ‘Review of Post Office Structure’, Press Release, 25 September 1985

            30. ibid.

            31. J Hunt (Postmaster-General), ‘Recorded Message for Seminar ‘ Information Technology and Economic Growth’, Media Release, 4 December 1985

            32. New Zealand, Communications Advisory Council, ‘Towards a more conducive climate for the Electronics Industry in New Zealand’, Report, Communications Advisory Council, Wellington, December 1985

            33. R N Mason and M S Morris, Post Office Review, Report dated 21 February 1986, Government Printer, Wellington, 1986

            34. ibid., p. 8

            35. ibid, p. 20

            36. W Mayne, ‘Broadcasting bid adds to the deregulation options’, National Business Review, 4April 1986, p. 31

            37. T Hyde, ‘How the sold telecom why they sold telecom,’ Metro, September 1991, pp. 55–69

            38. J Hunt (Postmaster-General), ‘Opening of the Post Office Union Annual Conference’, Speech at Challenge Hall, Quality Inn, Wellington, 28 July 1986

            39. New Zealand, ‘Broadcasting and Related Telecommunications in New Zealand’, Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry, September 1986, Government Printer, Wellington, 1986

            40. ibid., p. 90

            41. J Hunt (Postmaster-General), ‘Communications Advisory Council Report Released’, Media Release, 6 November 1986

            42. New Zealand, Parliamentary Debates, Vol. 474, 30 September 1986, pp. 4722–4740

            43. J Hunt (Postmaster-General), ‘Competition in the supply of telecommunication equipment and services’, Media Release, 30 November 1986

            44. Hyde, op. cit., p. 60

            45. Mascarenhas, op. cit., p. 27. The 1987 election was on 15 August 1987.

            46. Williams M. . 1992. . “The political economy of privatisation’. ”. In The Fourth Labour Government . , Edited by: Holland M. and Boston J.. p. 142 Auckland : : Oxford University Press. .

            47. Boston J. . 1992. . “‘The Cabinet and Policy Making’. ”. In The Fourth Labour Government . , Edited by: Holland M. and Boston J.. p. 75 Auckland : : Oxford University Press. .

            48. New Zealand. The Treasury, Government Management: Brief to the Incoming Government 1987, Volume 1, Government Printing Office, Wellington, 1987, p.4; See also B Easton, ‘Government Management: a Review of its Political Content’, Political Science, Vol. 42, No. 2, 1990, pp. 35–42

            49. Wanna J. . 1989. . ‘Centralisation with corporatism: the politics of New Zealand business in the recession’. . New Zealand Journal of Industrial Relations . , Vol. 14:: 1––15. .

            50. J Hunt (Postmaster-General), ‘CAC Disbands’, Media Release, 2 April 1987

            51. J Hunt (Postmaster-General), ‘Radio Spectrum Management’, Media Release, 5 May 1987

            52. N G Anderson, ‘The Telecom New Zealand Story’, dissertation submitted as partial requirement for the Diploma of Industrial Relations, Victoria University of Wellington, 10 October 1992, p. 4

            53. ‘Auckland's Telephone Crash’, TUANZ News (Telecommunications Users Association of New Zealand), No. 4, August 1987, p.1

            54. Hyde, op. cit., p. 59

            55. J Fountain, ‘Telecommunications in New Zealand: the case for reform’, New Zealand Business Roundtable, November 1987; R Prebble (Minister for State-Qwned Enterprises), ‘Telecommunications Deregulation’, Press Statement, 15 February 1988

            56. R Prebble, ‘Telecommunications Deregulation’, Media Release, 17 December 1987

            57. N G Anderson, op., cit., p. 4

            58. Hyde, op. cit., p. 58

            59. Mascarenhas, op. cit, p. 43

            60. R Prebble (Minister for State-Owned Enterprises), ‘Implementing Telecommunications Deregulation’, Media Release, 16 June 1988

            61. Mascarenhas, op. cit., p. 43

            62. J Boston, “The Cabinet and Policy Making’, op. cit., p. 74

            63. S Rodger (Minister for State-Owned Enterprises), ‘Creation of Television New Zealand Limited and Radio New Zealand Limited as State-Owned Enterprises’, Press Release, 2 December 1988

            64. M Jaspers, ‘Rivals merge to fight Telecom’, National Business Review, 8 May 1990, p.1

            65. P King, ‘Pointed questions about slow Telecom investigation’, The Dominion, 22 April 1991, p. 32

            66. Hyde, op. cit., p. 59

            67. ibid, p. 59

            68. P Hoskin, ‘Stranglehold chokes off critical voices’, National Business Review (Survey), 16 June 1989, p. 6

            69. M Williams, op. cit., p. 144

            70. P Isaac, ‘Backbenchers a threat to Telecom float’, The Dominion, 15 January 1990, p. 20

            71. New Zealand. Office of the Minister for State-Owned Enterprises, Office of the Minister of Finance, ‘Potential Sale of Telecom: Briefing Material’, 7 March 1990, p.1

            72. Hyde, op. cit., 61

            73. ibid., p. 62

            74. R Prebble (Minister for State-Owned Enterprises), ‘Final Step in Telecom Sale’, Media Release, 12 September 1990

            75. Anon, ‘Sales opposed by 96pc’, The Evening Post, 31 May 1990

            76. R Prebble (Minister for State-Owned Enterprises), ‘Final Step in Telecom Sale’, Media Release, 12 September 1990

            77. R Mascarenhas, op. cit., p. 49

            78. A Kroeber, ‘Fay Richwhite to be lead manager of Telecom float,’ National Business Review, 15 February, 1991, p. 1

            79. M Japers,‘Telecom rival tipped to snap up TVNZ division’, National Business Review, 20 February 1991, p.1

            80. M Japers and P Smith, ‘TVNZ confirms asset sale plan’, National Business Review, 21 February 1991, p.1

            81. R Laugesen, ‘Foreign firm could dominate NZ media’, The Evening Post, 26 March 1991

            82. See Hyde, op. cit., p. 68; and D Gault, ‘Current Telecommunications Policy Issues’, TUANZ 91 Conference Proceedings, 3–5 September 1991, Wellington, TUANZ, Auckland, 1991, pp. 159–168

            83. New Zealand. Commerce Commission, ‘Telecommunications Industry Inquiry Report’, Commerce Commission, Wellington, 23 June 1992, pp. 13–14

            84. ibid., p.7

            85. See Telecom Corporation of New Zealand, ‘Commerce Commission Report Unreasonably Negative, says Telecom’, Media Release, 25 June 1992; and Anon, ‘Williamson disputes telecoms finding’, New Zealand Herald, 7 July 1992

            86. This theme was evident at the Pacific Telecommunications Council's October Seminar held in Auckland, 15–16 October 1992

            87. A Perry, ‘Telecom breaking Rocs’, The Dominion (IT Weekly), 5 October 1992, p.1

            88. Anon, ‘NZ's Todd Corp takes a quarter stake in AAP Communications’, Communications Report, Vol. 3, No 16, 3 February 1992, p.5

            89. Telecom Corporation of New Zealand, ‘Telecom New Zealand Wins Multi-Million Dollar Queensland State-Government Contract, says Telecom’, Media Release, 5 June 1992;

            90. A Perry, ‘Telecom NZ strike threat over jobs’, The Australian, 22 February 1993, p. 13

            91. Trevor Barr, “The New Zealand Experiment in the Liberalisation of Telecommunications’, Research Report No 10, Centre of International Research on Communication and Information Technologies (CIRCIT), Melbourne, 1995, p. 3

            92. Trevor Barr, ibid., p. 3

            93. David Gabel and William Pollard, op.cit., p. 62

            94. Trevor Barr, op.cit., p. 3

            95. Trevor Barr, op.cit., p. 4

            96. Carl Blanchard, ‘Telecommunications regulation in New Zealand: how effective is ‘light-handed regulation’, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1994, pp. 154–164; Carl Blanchard, ‘Telecommunications regulation in New Zealand: light-handed regulation and the Privy Council's judgement’, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1995, pp. 465–476

            97. The Baumol-Willig Rule is also known as the Efficient Component Pricing Rule and Parity Principle. It is a rule for determining interconnection prices, under which the price is composed of the incremental costs of providing the interconnection service plus the profit (including contribution to common costs) that the network operator forgoes by selling interconnection rather than the final service which is served by interconnection.

            98. New Zealand. Ministry of Commerce and The Treasury, Regulation of Access to Vertically-Integrated Natural Monopolies, Wellington, New Zealand, August 1995.

            99. I am indebted to Brian Easton for this point - private communication, November 1994.

            100. R Mulgan,‘The Changing Electoral Mandate’, in M Holland and J Boston (eds), The Fourth Labour Government, Oxford University Press, Auckland, 1992, pp. 11–21

            101. J Newby, ‘Failure of the New Zealand Experiment’, in S Rees, G Rodley and F Stillwell (eds), Beyond the Marklet: Alternatives to Economic Rationalism, Pluto Press, Leichhardt, NSW, 1993, pp. 163–170. This point was confirmed in discussion with Steve Maharey, MP, New Zealand Parliament.

            102. T Hyde, ‘How they sold telecom why they sold telecom’, Metro, September 1991, pp. 55–69

            103. B Easton, ‘From Rogernomics to Ruthanasia: New Right Economics in New Zealand’, in S Rees, G Rodley and F Stillwell (eds). op.cH., 149–162

            104. Brian Easton, ibid., pp. 149–162

            105. David Gabel and William Pollard, op.cit, p. 22

            106. T Hyde, op. cit., p. 62

            107. John Braithwaite, ‘A Sociology of Modelling and the Politics of Empowerment’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 45, No. 3, 1994, pp. 445–479

            108. Michael Moran and Maurice Wright, ‘Conclusion: The Interdpendence of Markets and States’, in Michael Moran and Maurice Wright (eds), The Market and the State: Studies in Interdependence, Macmillan, London, 1991, p. 248

            Comments

            Comment on this article