91
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE IS NOT AN INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE

      Published
      research-article
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      capital, information, infrastructure, taxonomy, telecommunications
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            We are now living in the Information Age, where information-handling activities, taken, together, are the dominant claim on resources. The infrastructure needed to make this socio-economic system work is much more than the phones, switches, cables and satellites of the telecommunications engineers and the telecommunications equipment industry. The other complementary resources are a mix of people with skills, organizational capital, markets, a legal framework, regulatory institutions, and, especially, information stocks. Our concept of capital has to take in this mixed bag of resources.

            A focus on the social and economic implications of the growth of codified knowledge may well contribute to understanding the complex processes of change given new emphasis by the Information Age. One way of tackling this task is to develop a taxonomy of information, based on its economically significant characteristics, to replace the general purpose concept now in wide use.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            June 1996
            : 14
            : 1
            : 31-38
            Affiliations
            Article
            8632014 Prometheus, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1996: pp. 31–38
            10.1080/08109029608632014
            23682453-c2f7-475f-8007-1e3fbce903d9
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 27, Pages: 8
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            taxonomy,infrastructure,capital,information,telecommunications

            NOTES AND REFERENCES

            1. Schumpeter J. A.. 1952. . History of Economic Analysis . , p. 631 New York : : Oxford University Press. .

            2. Hodgson G. M.. 1993. . Economics and Evolution . , p. 23 Oxford : : Blackwell. .

            3. Information Infrastructure Task Force, The National Information Infrastructure: Agenda for Action, NTIA, US Department of Commerce, Washington DC, 1993, p.6

            4. Drake W. J.. 1995. . The New Information Infrastructure: Strategies for U.S. Policy . , p. 1––2. . New York : : Twentieth Century Fund Press. .

            5. Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Realizing the Information Future: The Internet and Beyond, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1994

            6. Anderson R. H.. 1995. . Universal Access to E-mail: Feasibility and Societal Implications . , Santa Monica : : RAND. .

            7. Stiglitz J. E.. 1994. . Whither Socialism? . , Cambridge , Mass. : : MIT Press. .

            8. Lamberton D. M.. 1965. . The Theory of Profit . , Oxford : : Blackwell. . The Limits of Organization

            9. von Weizsäcker C. C.. 1984. . The costs of substitution. . Econometrica . , Vol. 52:: 1085

            10. Marshall A.. 1925. . Principles of Economics . , 8th ed. , p. 780 London : : Macmillan. .

            11. Romer P.. 1993. . Ideas and things. . The Economist . , Vol. 328((7828)) September 11;: 64

            12. F. Machlup, The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1962; Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution and Economic Significance, Vol.III, The Economics of Information and Human Capital, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1984

            13. OECD, Information Activities, Electronics and Telecommunications Technologies: Impact on Employment, Growth and Trade, Vol. 1, OECD, Paris, 1981; Trends in the Information Economy, OECD, Paris, 1986

            14. Lamberton, op.cit.; ‘The economics of information and organization’, in M.E.Williams (ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol.19, American Society for Information Science, White Plains, N.Y., 1984, pp.3–30; “The information economy revisited’, in Robert E.Babe (ed.), Information and Communication in Economics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994, pp. 1–33;; ‘Organizational capital: an information-theoretic approach’, International Journal of New Ideas, 4(1), 1995, pp.33–38; ‘A taxonomy of information’, ENSSIB Conference on the Economics of Information, Villeurbanne, France, 1995; (ed.), The Economics of Communication and Information Edward Elgar International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Cheltenham UK, forthcoming 1996; (ed.), The New Research Frontiers of Communications Policy, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, forthcoming 1996

            15. J. Marschak, ‘Economics of inquiring, communicating, deciding’, American Economic Review, 58 (2), 1968, pp.1–18, reprinted in D.M.Lamberton (ed.), Economics of Information and Knowledge, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth UK, 1971

            16. Teece D. J., Rumelt R., Dosi G. and Winter S.. 1994. . Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence. . Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization . , Vol. 23((1)): 19

            17. Lamberton, 1965, op.cit., Ch.II

            18. Nelson R.. Production sets, technological knowledge, and R&D: fragile and overworked constructs for analysis of productivity growth? . American Economic Review . , Vol. 70((2))62––67. .

            19. Machlup F.. 1982. . Optimum utilization of knowledge. . Society: Knowledge, Information and Decision . , Vol. 20((1)) November/December;: 8––10. .

            20. Lamberton 1965, op.cit., p.42; Teece et al., op.cit., pp.18–19

            21. Taylor L. D.. 1993. . Telecommunications Demand in Theory and Practice . , Dordrecht : : Kluwer Academic Publishers. .

            22. P. A. David, ‘Technological change, intangible investments and growth in the knowledge-based economy: the US historical experience’, OECD Conference on Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Paris, 1995

            23. E.g., M.J.Menou (ed.), Measuring the Impact of Information on Development, IDRC Centre, Ottawa, 1993

            24. P.McConnell (ed.), Making a Difference: Measuring the Impact of Information on Development, IDRC Centre, Ottawa, 1995

            25. P. Streeten, ‘The limits of development research’, World Development, 2 (10–12), 1974, pp.11–34

            26. Cf. M.Henderson (ed.), Borders, Boundaries, and Frames, Cultural Criticism and Cultural Studies, Routledge, London, 1995

            27. Arrow, 1974, op.cit., p.49

            Comments

            Comment on this article