126
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      AUSTRALIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY IN AN INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT: ISSUES FOR THE FUTURE

      Published
      research-article
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Australia, telecommunications policy, industry policy, competition, international telecommunications
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Australian telecommunications policy is undergoing a period of rapid change. Policy statements released to date have placed emphasis on competition and liberalisation but with a focus on the domestic situation. Australia's involvement in international telecommunications policy change has received less attention than domestic telecommunications reform issues. It is argued in this paper that the success of what Australia wants to achieve nationally through telecommunications will depend in large part on international telecommunications regulatory developments and Australia's response to them. The complexity and direction of international change in telecommunications requires a more sophisticated approach to policy development than has taken place in Australia to date. This paper sketches an outline of current trends in international telecommunications reform, Australia's response to them and identifies issues for the future. These future issues include information policy, tensions between competition policy and trade policy, industry policy, direct foreign investment, and codes of conduct for multinational companies. Some areas requiring further research are also identified.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            June 1996
            : 14
            : 1
            : 51-65
            Affiliations
            Article
            8632016 Prometheus, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1996: pp. 51–65
            10.1080/08109029608632016
            4ae03134-e518-4f7e-8cd6-c85bb8e7d8d5
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 38, Pages: 15
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            Australia,international telecommunications,competition,industry policy,telecommunications policy

            NOTES AND REFERENCES

            1. Peter Drahos and Richard A Joseph, ‘Telecommunications and investment in the great supranational regulatory game’, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 19, No. 8, 1995, pp. 619–635

            2. These principles (MFN, National Treatment and Transparency) are more broadly applicable than in the GATS but are closely linked to international trade policy in this context. For a discussion of these principles see Industries Commission, Annual Report 1994–95, AGPS, Canberra, 1995

            3. Phillip Evans, Unpacking the GATT: A Step by Step Guide to the Uruguay Round, International Organisation of Consumers Unions, London, 1994, p. 32.

            4. Peter Drahos, ‘Global Property Rights in Information: The Story of TRIPS at the GATT’, Prometheus, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1995, pp. 6–19

            5. Peter Drahos, ‘Information Feudalism in the Information Society’, The Information Society, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1995, pp. 209–222; P Hirst and G Thompson, ‘Globalisation, foreign direct investment and international economic governance’, Organization, Vol.1, No.2, 1994, pp. 277–303

            6. Department of Communications and the Arts, Beyond the Duopoly: Australian Telecommunications Policy and Regulation, Issues Paper September 1994, DOCA, Canberra, 1994

            7. ibid., pp. 42–43

            8. Michael Lee, Minister for Communications and the Arts, ‘A New Era in Telecommunications’, News Release C76/95, 1 August 1995

            9. Innovate Australia, 6 December 1995 - available from the Department of Industry, Science and Technology, Canberra. The Information and Communications Services and Technologies Strategy is contained in these set of papers.

            10. ibid., Section 10.2, Information and Communications Services and Technologies Strategy.

            11. Department of Communications and the Arts, Annual Report 1994–95, AGPS, Canberra, 1995, p. 41

            12. ibid., p. 42

            13. DFAT, Winning Markets: Australia's Future in the Global Economy, AGPS, Canberra, 1995 cited in Industries Commission, Annual Report 1994–95, AGPS, Canberra, 1995, p. 115

            14. Lisa Filipetto, ‘A key role in trade development’, Insight, 4 April 1995, p. 5 (Insight is an internal magazine produced by DFAT).

            15. ibid.

            16. DFAT and DCA, ‘WTO: Negotiating Group on Basic Telecommunications’, Internal Briefing Paper, DFAT, April 1995

            17. John Parry, ‘WTO sets out to reshpare telecoms’, TELECOM 95 Daily, 9.10.95, cited in Teleclippings, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, No. 931, October/November 1995, pp. 33–34

            18. National Information Services Council, Agenda papers from the first meeting of the Council, 10 August 1995, Office of the Chief Scientist, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Canberra, August 1995, p. 93

            19. Don Lamberton, ‘Globaloney: The Impact of Regions on the Future of Emerging Markets in Information Technology and Trade’, Padific Telecommunications Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1993, pp. 3–10

            20. Anon, ‘Reviews, Inquiries, Reports Current and Foreshadowed’, Communications Update, Issue 102, August 1994, pp. 12–13

            21. House of Representatives Standing Committee for Long Term Strategies, Australia as an Information Society: Grasping New Paradigms, AGPS, Canberra, 1991; The Government's response to the above report was tabled in Parliament on 16 December 1992.

            22. For example, DFAT has produced several descriptive booklets on the outcomes of the Uruguay Round but little detailed publicly available literature on Australia's involvement in WTO with respect to telecommunications is available from DFAT. Details of US strategic planning are contained in Office of Technology Assessment (US Congress), US Telecommunications Services in European Markets, US Government Printing Office, August 1993, pp. 135–158

            23. OECD, Trade and Competition Policies: Comparing Objectives and Methods, Trade Policy Issues 4, OECD, Paris, 1994

            24. DOCA, Beyond the Duopoly, op.cit., p. 43

            25. Industries Commission, Annual Report 1994–95, op.cit., p. 92

            26. ibid., p. 93

            27. Anon, ‘Japan attacks trade breach’, Illawarra Mercury, 26 August 1995, p. 22; David Hartquist, ‘A Perspective on US Trade and Investment Initiatives in the Asia Pacific Region’, Address to the John Curtin Centre, Sydney, 30 October 1995; Nigel Wilson, ‘WTO may act over trade rules: lobbyist’, The Australian, 1 November 1995, p.6

            28. Michael Lee, op.cit., Policy Principles 90–92.

            29. Trevor Barr, The New Zealand Experiment in the Liberalisation of Telecommunications, CIRCIT, Research Report No 10, CIRCIT, Melbourne, 1995

            30. Donald Lamberton, “The Infrastructure Concept: a neglected policy element’, paper presented to the Bureau of Transport and Communications Economics Communications Research Forum 1995, Gazebo Hotel, Sydney, 19–20 October 1995

            31. See for example Richard A. Joseph, ‘Direct foreign investment in telecommunications: a review of attitudes in Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany and the UK’, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 19, No. 5, 1995, pp. 413–426; Peter Drahos and Richard A Joseph, op.cit.

            32. Lenore Taylor, ‘Howard to limit Telstra sell-off’, The Australian, 24 Janaury, 1996, pages 1,4,31

            33. Anon, ‘100 per cent Oz-owned: Lee’, Communications Update, Issue 114, September 1995, pp. 4–5

            34. Senate Economics References Committee, Connecting You Now…Telecommunications to the Year 2000, AGPS, Canberra, 1995

            35. Commission of the European Communities, ‘A Level Playing for Direct Investment World-Wide’, Communication from the Commission, COM (95) 42 final, Brussels, 01.03.1995

            36. Michael A. Calvano, ‘Developing the Altruistic Telecommunication Enterprise, Human Resources Development Quarterly (International Telecommunication Union, Geneva), No. 59, April 1995, pp. 2–13

            37. Don Lamberton, ‘Globaloney….’, op.cit., p. 5

            38. Liberal and National Parties, Better Communications: Liberal and National Parties’ Policy 1996, Liberal and National Party, mimeo, Canberra, 1996 (available from Parliament House, Canberra).

            Comments

            Comment on this article