102
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      R&D Incentives and their Economic Outcomes in the Australian Context

      Published
      research-article
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      R&D Incentives, Industry R&D, Globalisation, National Identity, Product Innovation, Venture Capital, Australia
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Research and development (R&D) is presented not as a primary source of local economic activity but as secondary to fundamental factors influencing corporate survival in small economies. The increasing difficulties of demonstrating causality between levels of Industrial R&D (IRD) expenditure and local economic activity are discussed. It is argued that industry specific, selective support schemes are more likely than generic tax concessions to be effective in periods of rapid trans-national restructuring. Such support appears of limited value unless aligned with a broader policy to assist local enterprises to adapt to competitive forces.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            August 1997
            : 15
            : 2
            : 209-222
            Affiliations
            Article
            8632072 Prometheus, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1997: pp. 209–222
            10.1080/08109029708632072
            ca31d61e-3936-4505-a43d-5917d8aca4ad
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 18, Pages: 14
            Categories
            PAPERS

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            Globalisation,Australia,R&D Incentives,Venture Capital,National Identity,Product Innovation,Industry R&D

            Notes and References

            1. Industry Commission, Research and Development, Report 44, AGPS, Canberra, 1995.

            2. G. Freed, ‘Venture Capital and New Technology Opportunities’, Australian Academy of Technological Sciences & Engineering, Melbourne, 1993.

            3. Annual Reports: Email Ltd, Sydney, 1990–6, and Fisher & Peykel, Melbourne, 1994–6.

            4. M. Porter, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Free Press, New York, 1985.

            5. A new economics—one very different from that in text books—now applies in high technology. See, for example, W. B. Arthur, ‘Increasing Returns and the New World of Business’, Harvard Business Review 74, 4, 1996, pp. 100–111.

            6. Author's reviews of business plans as a venture capitalist.

            7. Cisco, 1996 Annual Report, San Jose, 1996.

            8. R. I. Dossier, ‘Les nouveaux maitres du monde—Pouvoirs fin de siecle’, Le Monde Diplomatique, May 1995, p. 19.

            9. L. Carrou, ‘Vers un Deplacement des centres de productions—L'industrie automobile européenne peut-elle suvivre à la mondialisation?’, Le Monde Diplomatique, September 1993, pp. 6–7.

            10. M. W. Rennie, ‘Born Global’, The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 1993.

            11. P. Romer, ‘Endogenous technological change’, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1990, pp. S71-S102.

            12. M. Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York, 1990.

            13. K. Ohmae, The End of the Nation State, Harper Collins, London, 1995.

            14. 200 companies control 26.8% of the world's production, moving from US$3 trillion to US$6 trillion between 1982 and 1992. Meanwhile the world's top 500 companies have retrenched 4 million staff while strongly improving their profits. John Cavanagh, Institute of Policy Studies, Washington DC, March 1994.

            15. US Council on Competitiveness, R&D Policy for Competitiveness. Sector Study: Automotive, April 1996.

            16. http:;sh;shwww.ratings.standardpoor.com/http:;sh;shwww.moodys.com/repldata/ratsov.htm

            17. Alan Durning, How Much is Enough?: The Consumer Society and the Future of the Earth, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 1992.

            18. P. Hall, ‘Incentives for industrial R&D: the Australian Experience’, Science and Public Policy, 23, 1996, pp. 215–228.

            Comments

            Comment on this article