1,021
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Institute of Employment Rights Journal is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The employment relationship

      research-article
      Institute of Employment Rights Journal
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.2307/j50020018
            instemplrighj
            Institute of Employment Rights Journal
            Pluto Journals
            2398-1326
            2398-1334
            1 January 2020
            : 3
            : 1 ( doiID: 10.13169/instemplrighj.3.issue-1 )
            : 62-72
            Article
            instemplrighj.3.1.0062
            10.13169/instemplrighj.3.1.0062
            fcc7115a-1d33-4497-a98d-4e9e905b7c1a
            © 2020 Institute of Employment Rights

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Custom metadata
            eng

            Labor law

            Endnotes

            1. Clyde & Co LLP and another v Bates van Winkelhof [2014] ICR 730, para 25, per Lady Hale.

            2. At the end of 2017, about 900,000 workers thought they were on zero-hours contracts whereas businesses reported 1.8 million zero-hours contracts: Contracts that do not guarantee a minimum number of hours: April 2018, ONS, 2018. The report explains that the discrepancy is likely to be largely because of a lack of realisation on the workers' part and the fact that many workers have more than one such contract.

            3. For example, with the proposed new statutory principles, is there a need for the implied term of mutual trust and confidence with its judicially imposed limits?

            4. Illegal conduct should, of course, be punishable — but as a separate infringement, if illegality has indeed occurred.

            Comments

            Comment on this article