265
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

       If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Epistemology and Moral Economies of Difference: Transforming Social Research

      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Colonialism’s incitement to difference threads through the historical and intellectual formation of academic institutions. How are today’s standards for scholarship compromised by methodologies and methods that are entwined with colonial productions of difference? My analysis begins with a brief consideration of colonialism’s social and intellectual projects, most particularly, I attend to some of their systematic productions of belonging and erasure. I then demonstrate how the power of coloniality extends through the hegemonic practices that define social science scholarship to (re)produce systematic erasures that continue to normalize particular forms of belonging and exclusion. My analysis illustrates that even when research practices have purportedly progressive aims, they can reproduce hegemonic relations of power through the ordinary constraints of epistemic foundations. The goal of this article is to provide analyses and insights that contribute to more globally inclusive intellectual environments, to a more diverse range of epistemologies, and to more effective studies of power and privilege. I conclude by considering decolonial strategies to build inclusive global communities of scholars and to transform our epistemic foundations of research.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            10.2307/j50020082
            intecritdivestud
            International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies
            Pluto Journals
            2516-550X
            2516-5518
            1 June 2018
            : 1
            : 1 ( doiID: 10.13169/intecritdivestud.1.issue-1 )
            : 45-57
            Affiliations
            American University, Washington, DC, USA
            Article
            intecritdivestud.1.1.0045
            10.13169/intecritdivestud.1.1.0045
            e0381d19-bb3a-44d4-ae7c-afc8bd4d557c
            © 2018 International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Custom metadata
            eng

            Social & Behavioral Sciences
            epistemology,methodology,research methods,colonialism,decolonialism,coloniality

            References

            1. Alcoff, L. M. (2007). Epistemologies of ignorance: Three types. In S. Sullivan & N. Tuana (Eds.), Race and epistemologies of ignorance (pp. 39–58). Albany: State University of New York.

            2. Carp, A. (2018). Slavery and the American university. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2018/02/07/slavery-and-theamerican university/

            3. Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

            4. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

            5. Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge (A. M. S. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

            6. Foucault, M. (1994). Aesthetics, method, and epistemology (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: The New Press.

            7. Gomez-Barris, M., & Gray, H. (2010). Traces in the social world. In M. Gomez-Barris & H. Gray (Eds.), Toward a sociology of the trace (pp. vii-xvi). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

            8. Gordon, A. (1997). Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

            9. Gramsci, A. (1995). Further selections from the prison notebooks (D. Boothman, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

            10. Grande, S. M. A. (2000). American Indian geographies of identity and power: At the crossroads of Indigena and Mestizaje. Harvard Educational Review, 70, 467–498.

            11. Grosfoguel, R. (2007). The epistemic decolonial turn: Beyond political-economy paradigms. Cultural Studies, 21, 211–223.

            12. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

            13. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

            14. Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzen & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 97–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

            15. Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies, 21, 240–270.

            16. McClintock, A., Mufti, A., & Shohat, E. (Eds.). (1997). Dangerous liaisons: Gender, nation, and postcolonial perspectives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

            17. Mignolo, W. (2003). Globalization and the geopolitics of knowledge: The role of the humanities in the corporate university. Nepantla: Views From the South, 4, 97–119.

            18. O'Brien, J. M. (2010). Firsting and lasting: Writing Indians out of existence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

            19. Osha, S. (2005). Kwasi Wiredu and beyond: The text, writing and thought in Africa. Dakra, Senegal: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa.

            20. Pascale, C.-M. (2007). Making sense of race, class, and gender: Commonsense, power, and privilege in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge.

            21. Pascale, C.-M. (2011). Cartographies of knowledge: Exploring qualitative epistemologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

            22. Pascale, C.-M. (Ed.). (2013). Social inequality & the politics of representation: A global landscape. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

            23. Pascale, C.-M. (2017). Discourses of the North Atlantic: Epistemology & hegemony. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 219–227.

            24. Pereira, M. d. M. (2014). The importance of being “modern” and foreign: Feminist scholarship and the epistemic status of nations. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 39, 627–657.

            25. Prasad, P. (2005). Crafting qualitative research: Working in the postpositivist traditions. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

            26. Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism and Latin America. Nepantla: Views From the South, 1, 533–580.

            27. Ramazanoglu, C., & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology: Challenges and choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

            28. Rappert, B. (2014). Present absences: Hauntings and whirlwinds in “- graphy.” Social Epistemology, 28, 41–55.

            29. Richardson, T. (2012). Disrupting the coloniality of being: Toward de-colonial ontologies in philosophy of education. Studies in the Philosophy of Education, 31, 539–551. doi:10.1007/s11217-011-9284-1

            30. Salem, S. (2014). Decolonial intersectionality and a transnational feminist movement. The Feminist Wire. Retrieved from http://www.thefeministwire.com/2014/04/decolonial-intersectionality/

            31. Santos, B. d. S. (2008). The world social forum and the global left. Politics & Society, 36, 247–270.

            32. Schiwy, F. (2007). Decolonization and the question of subjectivity. Cultural Studies, 21, 271–294.

            33. Shohat, E. (1991). Gender and culture of empire: Toward a feminist ethnography of the cinema. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 13, 45–84.

            34. Shohat, E. (2006). Taboo memories, diasporic voices. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

            35. Smith, D. (1990a). The conceptual practices of power. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

            36. Smith, D. (1990b). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. New York, NY: Routledge.

            37. Sullivan, S., & Tuana, N. (Eds.). (2007). Race and epistemologies of ignorance. Albany: State University of New York.

            38. Swan, E. (2010). States of White ignorance, and audit masculinity in English higher education. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State, and Society, 17, 477–506.

            39. Walsh, C. (2007). Shifting the geopolitics of critical knowledge: Decolonial thought and cultural studies “others” in the Andes. Cultural Studies, 21, 224–239.

            40. Warnier, J.-P. (2014). On agnotology as built-in ignorance. Africa Spectrum, 48(1), 113–116.

            41. Winch, P. (1958). The idea of a social science and its relationship to philosophy. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

            Comments

            Comment on this article