833
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

       If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tech Will Not Save Us: The Subjugation of Politics and Democracy to Big Tech

      research-article
      International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            10.2307/j50020082
            intecritdivestud
            International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies
            Pluto Journals
            2516-550X
            2516-5518
            1 December 2020
            : 3
            : 2 ( doiID: 10.13169/intecritdivestud.3.issue-2 )
            : 73-79
            Affiliations
            School of Communication, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, USA
            Article
            intecritdivestud.3.2.0073
            10.13169/intecritdivestud.3.2.0073
            044629ab-aaa8-4e35-a030-a60756c1c661
            © 2020 International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Custom metadata
            eng

            Social & Behavioral Sciences

            References

            1. Angwin, J., & Grassegger, H. (2017). Facebook's secret censorship rules protect white men from hate speech but not black children [Text/html]. ProPublica, June 28. https://www.propublica.org/article/facebook-hate-speech-censorship-internal-documents-algorithms

            2. Ball, P., & Maxmen, A. (2020). The epic battle against coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories. Nature, 581(7809), 371–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01452-z

            3. Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code (1st ed.). Cambridge: Polity.

            4. Berry, M. (2020). 49% Facebook employees don't believe it had positive impact on world. Fossbytes, November 4. https://fossbytes.com/49-facebook-employees-disagree-that-it-has-positive-impact-on-world/

            5. Boggs, G. L. (1974). Revolution and evolution in the twentieth century. London: Monthly Review Press.

            6. Boggs, G. L. (2013). Opinion: In Detroit, we have just begun to fight. Common Dreams. https://www.commondreams.org/views/2013/08/18/detroit-we-have-just-begun-fight

            7. Cooper, M. (2021). The alt-right: Neoliberalism, libertarianism and the fascist temptation. Theory, Culture and Society, 0263276421999446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276421999446

            8. Daniels, J. (2009). Cyber racism: White supremacy online and the new attack on civil rights. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

            9. Daniels, J. (2018). The algorithmic rise of the “alt-right”. Contexts, 17(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504218766547

            10. Dewey, C. (2015). Amazon, PayPal and Spotify inadvertently fund white supremacists. Here's how. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/03/17/amazon-paypal-and-spotify-inadvertently-fund-white-supremacists-heres-how/

            11. Dixit, P. (2021). I thought my job was to report on technology in India. Instead, I got a front-row seat to the decline of my democracy. BuzzFeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/pranav-dixit/indian-government-using-tech-destroy-democracy

            12. Donovan, J. (2020). Why social media can't keep moderating content in the shadows. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/11/06/1011769/social-media-moderation-trans-parency-censorship/

            13. Donovan, J. (2021). How social media's obsession with scale supercharged disinformation. Harvard Business Review, January 13. https://hbr.org/2021/01/how-social-medias-obsession-with-scale-supercharged-disinformation

            14. Donovan, J., Lewis, B., & Friedberg, B. (2019). Parallel ports: Sociotechnical change from the alt-right to alt-tech. In M. Fielitz & N. Thurston (Eds.), Post-digital cultures of the far right: Online actions and offline consequences in Europe and the US (pp. 50–67). London: transcript.

            15. Duguay, S. (2016). Trending this moment: Examining social media platforms as information gatekeepers through Facebook's Trending topics and Twitter's Moments. 66th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association: Communicating with Power, 9–13 September.

            16. Fink, C. (2018). Dangerous speech, anti-Muslim violence, and Facebook in Myanmar. Journal of International Affairs, 71(1.5), 43–52.

            17. Ganesh, B., & Bright, J. (2020). Countering extremists on social media: Challenges for strategic communication and content moderation. Policy and Internet, 12(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.236

            18. Gillespie, T. (2017). Governance of and by platforms. In J. Burgess, T. Poell, & A. Marwick (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media (pp. 254–278). London: SAGE.

            19. Gillespie, T. (2020). Content moderation, AI, and the question of scale. Big Data and Society, 7(2), 2053951720943234. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720943234

            20. Hannah, M. (2021). QAnon and the information dark age. First Monday, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i2.10868

            21. Leidig, E. (2020). Hindutva as a variant of right-wing extremism. Patterns of Prejudice, 54(3), 215–237.

            22. Lewis, B. (2020). White supremacy in Silicon Valley. TWC Newsletter, 12. https://news.techworkerscoalition.org/2020/10/16/issue-12/

            23. Maddox, J., & Malson, J. (2020). Guidelines without lines, communities without borders: The marketplace of ideas and digital manifest destiny in social media platform policies. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120926622

            24. Mak, A. (2020). How “Stop the Steal” exploded on Facebook and Twitter. Slate Magazine, November 5. https://slate.com/technology/2020/11/how-stop-the-steal-exploded-on-facebook-and-twitter.html

            25. Marantz, A. (2018). Reddit and the struggle to detoxify the internet. New Yorker, March 12. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/03/19/reddit-and-the-struggle-to-detoxify-the-internet

            26. Marwick, A. E., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online (pp. 1–106). Data & Society. http://centerformediajustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/DataAndSociety_MediaManipulationAndDisinformationOnline.pdf

            27. Mbembé, J.-A., & Meintjes, L. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), 11–40.

            28. Mills, C. W. (2014). The racial contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

            29. Molyneux, L., & McGregor, S. (2021). When journalists put tweets in news stories, do they transfer too much power to Twitter? Nieman Lab. https://www.niemanlab.org/2021/03/when-journalists-put-tweets-in-news-stories-do-they-transfer-too-much-power-to-twitter/

            30. Nemes, I. (2002). Regulating hate speech in cyberspace: Issues of desirability and efficacy. Information and Communications Technology Law, 11(3), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360083022000031902

            31. Nicas, J. (2020). YouTube cut down misinformation. Then it boosted Fox News. New York Times, November 5. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/03/technology/youtube-misinformation-fox-news.html

            32. Perez, S. (2019). Twitter claims increased enforcement of hate speech and abuse policies in last half of 2019. TechCrunch. https://social.techcrunch.com/2020/08/19/twitter-claims-increased-enforcement-of-hate-speech-and-abuse-policies-in-last-half-of-2019/

            33. Stokel-Walker, C. (2019). YouTube's plan to fix hate speech failed before it even started. Wired UK, June 6. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/youtube-steven-crowder-ban-hate-speech

            34. Stop AAPI Hate. (2020). Stop AAPI Hate National Report (pp. 1–15). https://stopaapihate.org/reports/

            35. Wong, J. C. (2020). “They don't think it's important”: Ellen Pao on why Facebook can't beat hate. The Guardian, July 21. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/jul/21/ellen-pao-facebook-free-speech-hate-social-media

            36. Wong, J. C. (2021). Revealed: The Facebook loophole that lets world leaders deceive and harass their citizens. The Guardian, April 12. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/apr/12/facebook-loophole-state-backed-manipulation

            37. Wong, J. C., & Ernst, J. (2021). Facebook knew of Honduran president's manipulation campaign – and let it continue for 11 months. The Guardian, April 13. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/apr/13/facebook-honduras-juan-orlando-hernandez-fake-engagement

            38. Yin, L., & Sankin, A. (2021). Google has a secret blocklist that hides YouTube hate videos from advertisers – but it's full of holes. The Markup. https://themarkup.org/google-the-giant/2021/04/08/google-youtube-hate-videos-ad-keywords-blocklist-failures

            Comments

            Comment on this article