1,744
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Islamophobia Studies Journal is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Saving Muslim Women: A Feminist-postcolonial Critique of Veiling Legislation in Norway

      research-article
      Islamophobia Studies Journal
      Pluto Journals
      Muslims, Western feminism, veiling, Norway
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This paper explores the connection between Western feminism and Islamophobia in Norway through an analysis of the veiling legislation of Siv Jensen, the leader of the Norwegian Progress Party. I argue that this legislation is guilty of cultural imperialism because it racializes Muslims in general as inferior, and Muslim women as passive victims in need of white women's liberation. Jensen's feminism exemplifies “Islamophobic victimization” because it suggests that veiled women have no agency under the entrenched patriarchy of Islam. Disguised in feminist language, her veiling legalization construes Islam as inferior and reinforces a colonial master narrative. It is marked by a special concern for what Rey Chow calls “the ‘subjectivity’ of the other-as-oppressed-victim.” Jensen's representation of Islam is Islamophobic in that it perpetuates negative stereotypes about Muslims and defines Islam as both inferior to, and incompatible with, Western culture. She asks a rhetorical question: “Are we going to be on the side of intolerant Islamic leaders who force women to wear the veil or are we going to be on the side of women who fight for greater tolerance and equality?” In doing so, she and her party demonstrate that unveiling is as much about saving Norway from Muslims as it is about saving Muslim women from Islam.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            10.13169
            islastudj
            Islamophobia Studies Journal
            Pluto Journals
            23258381
            2325839X
            Fall 2015
            : 3
            : 1
            : 78-89
            Affiliations
            Graduate Theological Union and University of California, Berkeley
            Article
            islastudj.3.1.0078
            10.13169/islastudj.3.1.0078
            918cda4f-ca3a-4ac3-bf87-0a261d5f3b50
            © Islamophobia Research and Documentation Project, Center for Race and Gender, University of California, Berkeley

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History

            Social & Behavioral Sciences
            Western feminism,veiling,Norway,Muslims

            Endnotes

            1. and , Islamophobia, Victimisation, and the Veil (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Pivot, 2014), 3.

            2. “Where have all the Natives Gone?” in Feminist Postcolonial Theory: A Reader , ed. and (New York: Routledge, 2003), 326.

            3. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, “Can the Subaltern Speak?” in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture , ed. and (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988), 296. Spivak offers this dictum as a comment on the relationship between colonizers and colonized. Reflecting on the suppression of Hindu widow sacrifice by British colonialism, she writes that white men are saving brown women from brown men. In A Critique of Postcolonial Reason, she writes: “white women—from the nineteenth century British Missionary Registers to Mary Daly—have not produced an alternative understanding” (287). Spivak contends that this racist phenomenon is still alive among Western feminists.

            4. Why the West Fears Islam: An Exploration of Muslims in Liberal Democracies (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, 9).

            5. and , Islamophobia, Victimisation, and the Veil (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Pivot, 2014, 3).

            6. See , Eight Theories of Religion (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), 53–84, 118–148. Nietzsche believed that there would come a day when the intellectual climate demanded proof as a requisite of belief. See The Gay Science , ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 109.

            7. and , European Muslims and the Secular State (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2005, 4).

            8. , “How Does it Feel to Be a Problem?,” Amerasia Journal 27 (2001–02): 72–73.

            9. , Between Warrior Brother and Veiled Sister: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Politics of Patriarchy in Iran (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005, 42).

            10. , Homi Conclusion: “Race, Time and the Revision of Modernity” in The Location of Culture (London: Routledge, 1994, 244).

            11. , Islamic Activist: The Anti-Enlightenment Democrats (London: Pluto Press, 2011, 14–16).

            12. Orientalism (New York: Vintage Books, 1978, 3).

            13. and , Islamophobia, Victimisation and the Veil (New York: Palgrave Pivot, 2014, 8).

            14. , Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992, 149).

            15. , “Am I a Muslim Woman? Nationalist Reactions and Postcolonial Transaction” in Shattering the Stereotypes: Muslim Women Speak Out , ed. (Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press, 2005), 53.

            16. , Rethinking Global Sisterhood: Western feminism and Iran (Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2007, xxv).

            17. “Where have all the Natives Gone?” 326.

            18. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , trans. (New York: Vintage Books, 1979, 27).

            19. , Can the Subaltern Speak? , 227.

            20. A Suitable Enemy: Racism, Migration and Islamophobia in Europe (London and New York: Pluto Press, 2009, 93).

            21. , “Frp vil ha Skautforbud” in Dagbladet , 02/05/2004, under, http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2004/02/05/390132.html (accessed, 19, February, 2015). All Norwegian-English translations are my own.

            22. , Men Størst av alt er friheten , (Oslo, Kagge Forlag, 2006, 135–136).

            23. Ibid., 164–165.

            24. Jensen has drawn parallels between radical Islam and both Nazism and communism. See , “Kampen mot radikal Islam er vår viktigste,” in Dagbladet , 03/02/2009, under http://www.dagbladet.no/2009/03/02/nyheter/innenriks/politikk/siv_jensen/islam/5100011/ (accessed 19, February, 2015).

            25. , “Siv Jensen, Landets ledende Feminist,” in Dagbladet , 4/10/2006, under http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2006/10/04/478642.html (accessed 19, February, 2015).

            26. , “Stikker hodet i sanden” in Aftenposten , 02/27/2009, under http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/Stikker-hodet-i-sanden-6611564.html (accessed, February 20, 2015).

            27. “Islam, Secularism and Multiculturalism After 9/11: A Transatlantic Comparison” in European Muslims , 46.

            28. , “Can the Subaltern Speak?,” 298.

            29. “Under Western Eyes” in Feminist Postcolonial Theory , 55.

            30. , “Siv Jensen Tale Under Landsmøte 2009 Del 2 av 5.” Youtube . Online Video clip, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj2fzy90n3U (accessed 1. April 2015). Jensen's speech can be found in several newspaper articles. I chose to use the video clip in order to make my own translation.

            31. Ali, Nomad: from Islam to America—a personal journey through the clash of civilizations (New York: Atria Paperbacks, 2013), 163.

            32. bell hooks (sic), “Sisterhood: Political Solidarity between Women” in Feminist Review 23 (June 1986): 132.

            33. Ibid., 245.

            34. Islam and Liberalism (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2015), 19.

            35. See , “Migrations, 2014,” SSB.no, under http://ssb.no/en/befolkning/statistikker/flytting/aar/2015-04-23#content (accessed, 1 April, 2015).

            36. “Can the Subaltern Speak?,” 299.

            37. “French Feminism In an International Frame” in Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics , (London: Methuen, 1987).

            38. NTB “Frp vil forby niqab og burka” in Dagbladet 02/20/2010, under, http://www.dagbladet.no/2010/02/20/nyheter/innenriks/frp/burka/10505085/ (accessed April 1, 2015).

            39. Islam and Liberalism , 123.

            40. Diskursens Orden , trans, (Oslo: Spartacus Forlag, A/S, 1999), 22.

            41. “Where have all the Natives Gone?,” 329.

            Comments

            Comment on this article