The Domestic is Political, and the Political is Gendered: An Analysis of Veiled Subjects, Gendered Epistemologies, and Muslim Bodies

If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

Islamophobia Studies Journal is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals. Furthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

scite_

Islamophobia Studies Journal

Volume 3, Issue 1

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

The Domestic is Political, and the Political is Gendered: An Analysis of Veiled Subjects, Gendered Epistemologies, and Muslim Bodies

research-article

Author(s): Christopher Nelson

Publication date (Print): Fall 2015

Journal: Islamophobia Studies Journal

Publisher: Pluto Journals

Bookmark

Content

Author and article information

Contributors

Christopher Nelson

Journal

Journal ID (doi): 10.13169

Journal ID (publisher-id): islastudj

Title: Islamophobia Studies Journal

Publisher: Pluto Journals

ISSN (Print): 23258381

ISSN (Electronic): 2325839X

Publication date (Print): Fall 2015

Volume: 3

Issue: 1

Pages: 106-114

Affiliations

Long Island University

Article

Publisher ID: islastudj.3.1.0106

DOI: 10.13169/islastudj.3.1.0106

SO-VID: a952038d-6ac8-41a3-b513-a27018748bc7

License:

All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

History

ScienceOpen disciplines: Social & Behavioral Sciences

References

Ahmed, L. (2011). A Quite Revolution: The Veil's Resurgence, from the Middle East to America . New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ali, A. (2007). Infidel: My journey from Somalia to the West. Cato's Letter: A Quarterly Message on Liberty , Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 1–8.
Auslander, L. (2000). Bavarian Crucifixes and French Headscarves: Religious Signs and the Postmodern European State. Cultural Dynamics , 12, 283–309.
Fernea, E. (1998). The Veiled Revolution. The Arab Studies Notebook , Handout 11, 1–2.
Horne, A. (1977). A Savage War of Peace: Algeria 1954–1962 . New York: New York Review Books.
Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects .
McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest . New York: Routledge.
Meer, N., & Modood, T. (2012). For “Jewish” read “Muslim” Islamaphobia as a Form of Racialisation of Ethno-Religious Groups in Britain Today. Islamaphobia Studies Journal , Vol. 1, No. 1, 34–53.
Modood, T. (2007). Multiculturalism. Massachusetts: Polity Press.
Rasheed, S., & Welles, L. (2013). Reframing Globalism: Dialogue and Difference in the Classroom: Muslim Students in New York Schools.
Rasheed, S. (2013). Islam, Sexuality, and the “War on Terror”: Luce Irigaray's Post-Colonial Ethics of Difference. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences , 31:1.
Scott, J. (1986). Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis. The American Historical Review , Vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 1053–1075.
Shehrbano, A. (2010). The Moderate Muslim. The International News .
Stoler, A. (2002). Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule . Berkeley: University of California Press.
Stoler, A. (2009). Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense . Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Walley, C. (1997). Searching for “Voices”: Feminism, Anthropology, and the Global Debate over Female Genital Operations. Cultural Anthropology , 12(3), pp. 405–438.

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] Ahmed, L. (2011). A Quite Revolution: The Veil's Resurgence, from the Middle East to America . New Haven: Yale University Press.

[2] Ali, A. (2007). Infidel: My journey from Somalia to the West. Cato's Letter: A Quarterly Message on Liberty , Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 1–8.

[3] Auslander, L. (2000). Bavarian Crucifixes and French Headscarves: Religious Signs and the Postmodern European State. Cultural Dynamics , 12, 283–309.

[4] Fernea, E. (1998). The Veiled Revolution. The Arab Studies Notebook , Handout 11, 1–2.

[5] Horne, A. (1977). A Savage War of Peace: Algeria 1954–1962 . New York: New York Review Books.

[6] Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects .

[7] McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest . New York: Routledge.

[8] Meer, N., & Modood, T. (2012). For “Jewish” read “Muslim” Islamaphobia as a Form of Racialisation of Ethno-Religious Groups in Britain Today. Islamaphobia Studies Journal , Vol. 1, No. 1, 34–53.

[9] Modood, T. (2007). Multiculturalism. Massachusetts: Polity Press.

[10] Rasheed, S., & Welles, L. (2013). Reframing Globalism: Dialogue and Difference in the Classroom: Muslim Students in New York Schools.

[11] Rasheed, S. (2013). Islam, Sexuality, and the “War on Terror”: Luce Irigaray's Post-Colonial Ethics of Difference. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences , 31:1.

[12] Scott, J. (1986). Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis. The American Historical Review , Vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 1053–1075.

[13] Shehrbano, A. (2010). The Moderate Muslim. The International News .

[14] Stoler, A. (2002). Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule . Berkeley: University of California Press.

[15] Stoler, A. (2009). Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense . Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

[16] Walley, C. (1997). Searching for “Voices”: Feminism, Anthropology, and the Global Debate over Female Genital Operations. Cultural Anthropology , 12(3), pp. 405–438.