668
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      The Journal of Fair Trade is calling for papers to curate a Special Edition on the theme of "Livelihoods, Community Resilience & Evironmental Regeneration: the role of smallholder organisations, coops & Social Enterprise". 

      We're welcoming expressions of interest until 1 July 2024 and article subsmissions by 15th January 2025 Call for Papers Volume 6 Issue 2 deadline.

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Greed does not have to drive business: the role of Fair Trade Enterprises as proof of concept

      Published
      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Maximising and extracting profits has become the central design feature of mainstream business. Fortunately, alternatives to this idea are on the rise, among them the Fair Trade Enterprises spread across over seventy countries. Distinct from commodity-focused models, Fair Trade's enterprise verification system (WFTO system) is focused on the mission, priorities and structures of an entire enterprise. Recent analysis of this Fair Trade Enterprise model has uncovered distinct structural features that shape their priorities and decision-making processes. Such structural features determine where profits go, which stakeholders are given power and, ultimately, whom the business is set up to benefit. By remaining mission-led, Fair Trade Enterprises demonstrate that business can be viable without endlessly pursuing profit maximisation. This is an idea that can transcend social and environmental objectives, particularly in tackling rising inequality. Fair Trade's community of verified mission-led enterprises can be a proof of concept for the enterprises of the new economy.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.2307/j50020019
            jfairtrade
            Journal of Fair Trade
            Pluto Journals
            2513-9525
            2513-9533
            1 October 2019
            : 1
            : 2 ( doiID: 10.13169/jfairtrade.1.issue-2 )
            : 14-23
            Article
            jfairtrade.1.2.0014
            10.13169/jfairtrade.1.2.0014
            ae31033c-8634-49ff-9225-864f9e486aff
            © 2019 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Custom metadata
            eng

            Education,Agriculture,Social & Behavioral Sciences,History,Economics
            certification,sustainable development,labour rights,supply chains,inequality,corporate governance,social enterprise,Fair Trade,poverty,smallholder farming

            Footnotes

            1. Cambridge Dictionary. (2019). Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/greed

            2. Stout, L.A. (2013). The toxic side effects of shareholder primacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161(7), 2003-2023.

            3. The International Fair Trade Charter. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.fair-trade.website/

            4. Jena, P.R. & Grote, U. (2017). Fairtrade certification and livelihood impacts on small-scale coffee producers in a tribal community of India. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 39(1), 87-110. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppw006

            5. Fairtrade International. (2018). Benefits of Fairtrade. Retrieved from https://www.fairtrade.net/about-fairtrade/benefits-of-fairtrade.html

            6. Fairtade Africa. (2018). An open letter to Sainsbury's from Fairtrade producers. Retrieved from https://www.fairtradeafrica.net/uncategorized/an-open-letter-to-sainsburys-from-fairtrade-producers/

            7. WFTO members are predominantly Fair Trade Enterprises (also known as Fair Trade Organisations), who must earn the majority of their income from trading. There are also other categories of WFTO membership: Fair Trade Networks (network organisations with their own members) and Fair Trade Support Organisations (these predominantly support Fair Trade but do not earn the majority of their income through trade). The WFTO Guarantee System applies to all these categories of membership and all are audited independently. Most members have successfully completed the monitoring requirements to become Guaranteed members. Others are classified as provisional members until they have completed these requirements. They have a specific period in which to complete this.

            8. DTI. (2002). Social enterprise: A strategy for success. London: Department of Trade and Industry.

            9. Doherty, B., Haugh, H. & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16, 417-436. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12028

            10. Maitland, A. (2019). Fairer procurement: The equitable business tool. Retrieved from https://views-voices.oxfam.org.uk/2019/01/how-to-buy-from-fairer-business/

            11. Social Enterprise Mark CIC. (2019). Application information. Retrieved from https://www.socialenterprisemark.org.uk/assessment/#toggle-id-11

            12. Shahzad, A.M., Rutherford, M.A. & Sharfman, M.P. (2016). Stakeholder-centric governance and corporate social performance: A cross-national study. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt., 23, 100-112. doi: 10.1002/csr.1368

            13. Based on a review of member profiles of the 323 trading members of the WFTO in June 2018.

            14. It is difficult to report figures at this stage without analysing the legal requirements for different business legal forms within the seventy-two countries but there was significant reporting of boards with such characteristics.

            15. By ‘new Economy’, I refer to the ideas of organisations such as New Economy Coalition, Wellbeing Economy Alliance and others involved in gatherings such as NESI (New Economy and Social Innovation Forum).

            16. Lakner, C., Lakner, C., Negre, M. and Prydz, E.B. (2014). The role of inclusive growth in ending extreme poverty. Retrieved from http://www.ecineq.org/ecineq_lux15/FILESx2015/CR2/p191.pdf

            17. Oxfam. (2014). Even it up: Time to end extreme inequality. Retrieved from https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/cr-even-it-up-extreme-inequality-291014-en.pdf

            18. Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing

            19. Wilkinson, R. & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin

            20. Ibid.

            21. Hoy, C. & Samman, E. (2015). What if growth had been as good for the poor as everyone else. Retrieved from http://www.odi.org/publications/9588-income-inequality-poverty-growth

            22. Alejo Vázquez Pimentel, D., Macías Aymar, I. & Lawson, M. (2017). Reward work, not wealth. Retrieved from https://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/reward-work-not-wealth-to-end-the-inequality-crisis-we-must-build-an-economy-fo-620396

            23. Konczal, M. (2018). The shareholder revolution devours its children. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.com/article/the-shareholder-revolution-devours-its-children/

            24. Ibid.

            25. Hardoon, D. (2016). An economy for the 99%: It's time to build an economy that benefits everyone, not just the privileged few. Oxford: Oxfam. Retrieved from https://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/an-economy-for-the-99-its-time-to-build-a-human-economy-that-benefitseveryone-620170

            26. Konczal, M. (2018). Op. cit.

            27. Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E. & Zucman, G. (2018). World inequality report. Retrieved from http://wir2018.wid.world

            28. Sahan, E. (2016). Does business structure influence social impact. Retrieved from https://www.enterprise-development.org/wp-content/uploads/Does-business-structure-influence-social-impact-OxfamDCED-Briefing-Note.pdf

            29. Hartigan, P. (2014). Why social entrepreneurship has become a distraction: it's mainstream capitalism that needs to change. Retrieved from https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/why-social-entrepreneurship-has-become-a-distraction-its-mainstream-capitalism-that-needs-to-change/

            30. Social Enterprise Mark CIC: Upholding the Standard for Social Enterprise. https://www.socialenterprisemark.org.uk/

            31. Social Traders. https://www.socialtraders.com.au/

            32. Social Enterprise UK. https://www.socialenterprise.org.uk/

            33. BCorporation. (2019). A global community of leaders. Retrieved from https://bcorporation.net/

            34. B. Corporation. What are BCorps. Retrieved from http://bcorporation.eu/what-are-b-corps

            35. Coalition for Inclusive Capitalism. https://www.inc-cap.com/

            36. A Blueprint for Better Business. https://www.blueprintforbusiness.org/

            37. Kenny, G. (2014). Your company's purpose is not its vision, mission, or values. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2014/09/your-companys-purpose-is-not-its-vision-mission-or-values

            38. Vanderbloemen, W. (2017). Why purpose should be a pivotal part of your business strategy. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamvanderbloemen/2017/01/29/why-purpose-should-be-a-pivotal-part-of-your-business-strategy/#496e67cf4135

            39. Trebeck, K. & Williams, J. (2019). The economics of arrival: Ideas for a grown-up economy. Bristol: Policy Press.

            Comments

            Comment on this article