65
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bioleft: open-source seeds for low-input farming systems

      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This article describes Bioleft, an ‘open source’, highly collaborative seed breeding initiative, in order to encourage reflection on potential synergies with fair trade ideas and practices. Bioleft aims to develop and redistribute collective agency over seed breeding, as a response to the emergence of an oligopolistic seed industry. It is experimenting with novel approaches to seed innovation that increase the diversity of crop varieties, in order to support agricultural practices that are ignored by mainstream seed firms, particularly small-scale family farming and more ecologically and socially sustainable agricultural practices. More generally it is experimenting with new forms of social and productive organization based on norms of sharing and solidarity.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.2307/j50020019
            jfairtrade
            Journal of Fair Trade
            Pluto Journals
            2513-9525
            2513-9533
            1 June 2020
            : 2
            : 1 ( doiID: 10.13169/jfairtrade.2.issue-1 )
            : 39-43
            Article
            jfairtrade.2.1.0039
            10.13169/jfairtrade.2.1.0039
            7081a3cd-21c0-41ca-831a-926db545c7bb
            © 2020 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            Custom metadata
            eng

            Education,Agriculture,Social & Behavioral Sciences,History,Economics
            Bioleft,Open-source seeds,Collaborative innovation

            References

            1. Baden, T., Chagas, A. M., Gage, G., Marzullo, T., Prieto-Godino, L. L. and Euler, T. (2015). Open Labware: 3-D printing your own lab equipment. PLoS Biology, 13(3).

            2. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven (CT) and London: Yale University Press.

            3. Falcon, W. and Fowler, C. (2002). Carving up the commons: emergence of a new international regime for germplasm development and transfer. Food Policy, 27, 197-222.

            4. Fess, T.L., Kotcon, J.B. and Benedito, V.A. (2011). Crop breeding for low input agriculture: a sustainable response to feed a growing world population. Sustainability, 3, 1742-1772.

            5. Fulton, M. and Giannakas, K. (2001). Agricultural biotechnology and industry structure. AgBioForum, 4(2), 137-151.

            6. Howard, P.H. (2015). Intellectual property and consolidation in the seed industry. Crop Science, 55, 2489-2495.

            7. IPES-Food (2016). From uniformity to diversity: A paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems. http://www.ipes-food.org/_img/upload/files/UniformityToDiversity_FULL.pdf.

            8. Kotschi, J. and Horneburg, B. (2018). The Open Source Seed Licence: A novel approach to safeguarding access to plant germplasm. PLoS Biology, 16(10): e3000023.

            9. Luby, C.H., Kloppenburg, J., Michaels, T.E. and Goldman, I.L. (2015). Enhancing freedom to operate for plant breeders and farmers through open source plant breeding. Crop Science, 55, 2581-2488.

            10. Piesse, C. and Thirtle, C. (2010). Agricultural R&D, technology and productivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 3035-3047.

            11. Quilley, S., Hawreliak, J. and Kish, K. (2016). Finding an alternative route: Towards open, eco-cyclical, and distributed production. Journal of Peer Production, 9.

            12. Schenkelaars, P., de Vriend, H. and Kalaitzandonakes, N. (2011). Drivers of consolidation in the seed industry and its consequences for innovation. Report for COGEM (Commissie Genetische Modificatie). Wageningen (NL): Schenkelaars Biotechnology Consultancy.

            13. Tripp, R. and Louwaars, N. (1997). Seed regulation: Choices on the road to reform. Food Policy, 22, 433-446.

            14. Van Zwanenberg, P., Fressoli, M., Arza, V., Smith, A. and Marin, A. (2017). Open and collaborative developments, STEPS Working Paper 98, Brighton: STEPS Centre.

            15. Weber, S. (2004). The success of open source. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

            Comments

            Comment on this article