636
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares

      The Journal of Fair Trade is calling for papers to curate a Special Edition on the theme of "Livelihoods, Community Resilience & Evironmental Regeneration: the role of smallholder organisations, coops & Social Enterprise". 

      We're welcoming expressions of interest until 1 July 2024 Call for Papers Volume 6 Issue 2 deadline.

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An investigation of Fair Trade product knowledge, beliefs, experiences and buying intentions of Generation Z in the US

      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            The Fair Trade movement is an alternative way to conduct international and domestic business by trying to improve trading conditions of disadvantaged producers around the world through consumer actions. Consumers can support the movement by purchasing FT certified products, which confirm that products meet ethical principles and environmental standards that are set in accordance with the requirements. However, FT product sales in the US have been lagging in comparison to the FT product sales in Europe. For instance, per capita consumption of the value of FT products was approximately €3 in the US in comparison to €34 in the UK (Fairtrade International, 2016). This study investigates several variables that can influence Fair Trade consumption, and, specifically, the effects of consumers’ knowledge, beliefs and past experiences on their purchase intentions of Fair Trade products among urban youth consumers in the US. Using the Theory of Reasoned Action as the conceptual framework, data were collected from 154 subjects using an online survey. The results indicate that consumer knowledge about FT has significant positive influence on their purchase intentions, but this relationship is mediated and strengthened by their beliefs and past behaviour. We offer various implications of these findings to FT businesses and organisations.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.13169/jfairtrade
            Journal of Fair Trade
            JOFT
            Pluto Journals
            2513-9533
            30 March 2022
            2022
            : 3
            : 2
            : 34-52
            Author notes
            [* ] Correspondence: Zoia Pavlovskaia
            [* ] Correspondence: Ali Kara
            Article
            10.13169/jfairtrade.3.2.0034
            70e1ad12-3cc0-46ac-841f-f7c4d6570acc

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Pages: 19
            Categories
            Essays

            Education,Agriculture,Social & Behavioral Sciences,History,Economics
            fair trade,Generation Z,theory of reasoned action,fair trade purchase intentions

            References

            1. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In & (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

            2. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

            3. & (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

            4. (2013). Ethical consumption in Germany: A cross-sectional analysis of determinants of Fair Trade consumption (2000–2010). Journal of Sociology, 42(5), 424–443.

            5. , & (2012). Research on fair trade consumption: A review. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4), 415–435.

            6. , & (2013). Purchasing behavior of Fairtrade customers. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(7), 1957–1967. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361071957.

            7. , & (2009). Does fair trade deliver on its core value proposition? Effects on income, educational attainment, and health in three countries. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 28(2), 186–201.

            8. & (2013). Electronic service quality and value: Do consumer knowledge-related resources matter? Journal of Service Research, 16(2), 231–246.

            9. & (2007). Global social preferences and the demand for socially responsible products: Empirical evidence from a pilot study on fair trade consumers. The World Economy, 30(5), 807–836.

            10. , Diaz & (2008). Fair trade: Just how ‘fair’ are the exchanges? Journal of Macromarketing, 28(1), 44–52.

            11. & (2018). Determinants of fair trade product purchase intention of Dutch consumers according to the extended theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Consumer Policy, 41(3), 191–210.

            12. (2018). Almost all shoes sold in the U.S. are imported. Now the industry is terrified of tariffs. Washington Post, 24 July. Document available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2018/07/24/almost-all-shoes-sold-us-are-imported-now-industry-is-terrified-tariffs/.

            13. & (2000). Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude–behaviour gap. Journal of Communication Management, 4(4), 355–368.

            14. (2013) Buying into Fair Trade: Culture, morality, and consumption. Albany, NY: New York University Press.

            15. & (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer: Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577.

            16. , & (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158.

            17. , , , & (2009) The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9669-4

            18. (2021). California’s garment worker bill will fuel The ‘Made In USA’ comeback. Here’s why. Forbes, 25 September. Document available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/elizabethlcline/2021/09/25/californias-garment-worker-bill-will-fuel-the-made-in-usa-comeback-heres-why/?sh=27cc2dea6062.

            19. , & (1981). Measure unreliability: A threat to cross cultural marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 45(2), 98–109.

            20. , & (2011). The role of self-identity, past behavior, and their interaction in predicting intention to purchase fresh and processed organic food. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00796.x

            21. , , & (2014). Gender differences in psychosocial determinants of university students’ intentions to buy fair trade products. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9262-4

            22. & (2007). A model for fair trade buying behavior: The role of perceived quantity and quality of information and of product-specific attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 361–380.

            23. , & (2005). Consumer values and fair-trade beliefs, attitudes and buying behaviour. International Review on Public and Non Profit Marketing, 2, 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893257

            24. , & (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363–385.

            25. , , & (2013). Where now for fair trade? Business History, 55(2), 161–189. https://doi-org.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/10.1080/00076791.2012.692083

            26. (2009). The role of personal values in fair trade consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 549–563.

            27. , , & (2014). The economics of fair trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 217–236.

            28. , , & (2020). Fairtrade nexus between just-world beliefs and normative antecedents. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 38(7), 991–1005. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-04-2020-0170

            29. , , , & (2020). The role of subjective knowledge and perceived trustworthiness in fair trade consumption for fashion and food products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-08-2019-3356

            30. & (1977). Empirical research on comparative advertising: A review of the evidence. Buffalo, NY: School of Management, State University of New York at Buffalo (September).

            31. EUR-Lex. (2016, December 7). Fair trade – trade-related sustainability assurance schemes. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM%3Adv0004.

            32. Fair Trade Certified. (n.d.). Products. https://www.fairtradecertified.org/products.

            33. Fair Trade Certified. (n.d.). Why Fair Trade. https://www.fairtradecertified.org/why-fair-trade.

            34. Fairtrade International. (2016) 2015–2016 annual report. https://www.fairtrade.net/library/2015-16-annual-report

            35. Fairtrade International. (2019). 2018–2019 annual report. https://files.fairtrade.net/publications/2018-19_FI_AnnualReport.pdf. Accessed on February 10, 2021 .

            36. Fair Trade USA. (2018a). Consumer packaged goods program [PowerPoint slides]. https://www.fairtradecertified.org/sites/default/files/filemanager/documents/CPG%20Resources/CPG_LandingPage101_190906.pdf.

            37. Fair Trade USA. (2018b). 2018 annual report. https://www.fairtradecertified.org/sites/default/files/filemanager/documents/Annual%20Reports/DEV_AnnualReport18_200108.pdf.

            38. & (2001). Augmenting planned behavior with self identity theory: Self-identity, past behavior, and its moderating effects in predicting intention. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 671–685.

            39. (1989). Adaptive-innovative cognitive styles of market initiators. In (Ed.), Adaptors and innovators: Styles of creativity and problem-solving (pp. 125–157). London: Routledge.

            40. & (2018). ‘True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey Insights, 12 November. Available at https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies, Document retrieved October 2021.

            41. , , & (2018). Europe’s culture(s): Negotiating cultural meanings, values, and identities in the European context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(6), 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118779144

            42. & (2020). University youth and ethical purchases. Optimum. Economic Studies, 1(99), 155–173. DOI:[Cross Ref].

            43. , & (2011). Consumer demand for the fair trade label: Evidence from a field experiment, Review of Economics and Statistics (DOI: [Cross Ref]).

            44. (1964). Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York: Harper & Row.

            45. & (2006). Three key challenges for reaching the mainstream. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3041-8

            46. , & (2020) Fair trade advertising: Influences of information type and emotional appeal congruency. Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(2), 186–206.

            47. , & (2015). Generation Y’s moral obligation and purchase intentions for organic, fair-trade, and recycled apparel products. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 8(2), 97–107.

            48. , & (2005). The influence of ethical trading policies on consumer apparel purchase decisions. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(5), 371–387.

            49. & (1988). LISREL VII: Analysis of linear structural relationships. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.

            50. (1970). A second-generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4): 401–415.

            51. , , , , , , . . . & (2012). The influence of reputational concerns on purchase intention of fair-trade foods among young Japanese adults. Food Quality and Preference, 26(2), 204–210.

            52. (2019). Consumers’ willingness to buy and willingness to pay for fair trade food: The influence of consciousness for fair consumption, environmental concern, trust and innovativeness. Food Research International, 120, 141–147.

            53. (2007). Fair Trade 2007: New facts and figures from an ongoing success story. Online. Accessed at http://www.jaarverslag2009.wereldwinkels.nl/db/upload/documents/Fair_Trade_2007_New_facts_and_figures_from_an_ongoing_success_story.pdf.

            54. & (2016). Green purchase behavior of undergraduate students in Hong Kong. Social Science Journal, 53, 67–76.

            55. (2008). Fairtrade: Working to make markets fair. In Trade – What If? New Challenges in Export Development. Consumers, Ethics and Environment (pp. 57–78). Geneva: International Trade Centre.

            56. , , & (2012). Does green fashion retailing make consumers more eco-friendly? The influence of green fashion products and campaigns on green consciousness and behavior. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 30(1), 67–82.

            57. , & (2011) Predicting the intentions to buy fair-trade products: The role of attitude, social norm, perceived behavioral control, and moral norm. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(10), 77–84.

            58. , , , & (2017). Anticipated consumer guilt: An investigation into its antecedents and consequences for fair-trade consumption. Journal of Macromarketing, 37(4), 444–459.

            59. , & (2012). Young female consumers’ intentions toward fair trade consumption. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 40(1), 41–63.

            60. (2007). Young consumers’ fair trade consumption: Application of the theory of planned behavior to non-food fair trade purchases, Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University.

            61. (2013). The paradox of fair trade. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 12(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.48558/BJ0F-X349.

            62. (2020). Where does the Fair Trade money go? How much consumers pay extra for Fair Trade coffee and how this value is split along the value chain. World Development, 133, 105006.

            63. , , & (2019). Fair trade products and sustainable consumer behaviour. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 8(4), 825–840.

            64. & (2020). Some attitudinal predictors of fair-trade buying behavior in the United States. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 14(2), 87–95.

            65. Nielsen Report. (2015). The sustainability imperative: New insights on consumer expectations. Available at https://www.nielsen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/04/Global20Sustainability20Report_October202015.pdf. Accessed 4 October 2021 .

            66. & (1994). Free trade, fair trade, strategic trade, and protectionism in the US Congress, 1987–88. International Organization, 48(3), 491–525.

            67. (1970). Introduction to psychological measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill.

            68. , & (2017). Ethical food choices: Examining people’s Fair Trade purchasing decisions. Food Quality and Preference, 60, 105–112.

            69. & (2011). Why does not everybody purchase fair trade products? The question of the fairness of fair trade products’ consumption for consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(6), 655–660.

            70. & los (2018a). How do consumers face the decision to buy fair trade products? A marketing approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(5), 1057–1080.

            71. , & los (2018b). Information and knowledge as antecedents of consumer attitudes and intentions to buy and recommend fair-trade products. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 30(2), 111–133.

            72. (2020). Sustainable retail: How gen Z is leading the pack. Forbes, available at: www.forbes.com/sites/gregpetro/2020/01/31/sustainable-retail-how-gen-z-is-leading-the-pack.

            73. (2011, December). At the intersection of politics and consumption: A research agenda for investigating the effects of fair trade marketing claims on ethical shopping behavior. Journal of Leadership, Accountability, and Ethics, 8(5), 63–71.

            74. , & (1995). Including moral dimensions of choice within the structure of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 484–494.

            75. & (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of research on fair trade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

            76. , & (Eds.). (2007). Fair trade: The challenges of transforming globalization. London: Routledge.

            77. , & (2015). Is there a ‘fair’ in fair-trade? Social dominance orientation influences perceptions of and preferences for fair-trade products. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2221-9

            78. , , & (2010). The role of self-identity in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1085–1105.

            79. & (2011) Altruistic behavior and habit formation. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 21(3), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.20023

            80. , & (2014). Faith and fair-trade: The moderating role of contextual religious salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(3), 1–19.

            81. & (1999). Belief formation in ethical consumer groups: An exploratory study. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 17(2), 109–119.

            82. , & (2000). The contribution of ethical obligation and self-identity to the theory of planned behaviour: An exploration of ethical consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(8), 879–894.

            83. & (1983). Attitude-behavior consistency: The impact of product trial versus advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 257–267.

            84. Statista. (2021). Trends in global export value of trade in goods from 1950 to 2020. Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/264682/worldwide-export-volume-in-the-trade-since-1950/.

            85. (1997). The problems of translating fair trade principles into consumer purchase behavior. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 15(1), 32–37.

            86. , , , & (2021). Generation Z marketing and management in tourism and hospitality. Cham: Springer.

            87. (2010). What is fair trade? Third World Quarterly, 31(3), 431–447.

            88. & (2019). Effects of perceived justice of fair trade organizations on consumers’ purchase intention toward fair trade products. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50(9), 66–72.

            89. , & (2012). Belief in a just world: Consumer intentions and behaviors toward ethical products. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 103–118.

            90. World Fair Trade Organisation. (2010), 10 standards of fair trade, available at: https://wfto.com/index.php?option%25C2%25BCcom_content&task%25C2%25BCview&id%25C2%25BC2&Itemid%25C2%25BC14 (accessed 4 November 2020 ).

            91. & (2006). Fair trade marketing: An exploration through qualitative research. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(4), 411–426.

            Comments

            Comment on this article