341
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Journal of Global Faultlines is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Losing grasp over the global financial system: the retreat of the North vs. the advance of the South

      Published
      research-article
      Journal of Global Faultlines
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            During the past decade the world has witnessed an unprecedented rise of emerging powers across the developing world. This development, accelerated by the recent global financial crisis, has led to a gradual increase of emerging powers involvement in international governance structures. Unlike the past, when the economic rise of new players such as Japan and the European Union (EU) somewhat challenged the American economic supremacy but did not alter much in the global landscape, the new wave of challengers seem to have the capabilities not only to change the balance within global governance structures but can also potentially shift the very structures themselves. To this end, emerging powers seem to increase their pressure over reform processes through their coordination as well as the institutionalization of alternatives to existing global and regional governance structures that fit more to their understanding of the world.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            10.13169
            jglobfaul
            Journal of Global Faultlines
            Pluto Journals
            23977825
            20542089
            September 2013
            : 1
            : 1
            : 70-88
            Affiliations
            Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Peloponnese. E-mail: petropouloss@ 123456yahoo.gr
            Article
            jglobfaul.1.1.0070
            10.13169/jglobfaul.1.1.0070
            5dff8b11-0299-45f4-a203-059fb5f18f2b
            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History

            Social & Behavioral Sciences

            References

            1. and (2007) ‘Changing Nature of North-South Linkages: Stylized Facts and Explanations’, IMF Working Paper , WP/07/280.

            2. and (2000) ‘The Russian Default and the Contagion to Brazil’, IMF Working Paper , WP/00/160.

            3. Balkans.com (2011) ‘FYROM: Construction of 12 hydro power plants along the river Vardar soon’, 12 April. [Online] Available at: <http://www.balkans.com/open-news.php?uniquenumber=101249> [accessed September 2013].

            4. BBC (2011), ‘China refuses to commit to EFSF amid Greek concerns’, 3 November. [Online] Available at: <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15567853> [accessed September 2013].

            5. (2005) ‘Rescuing the Doha Round’, Foreign Affairs , December 2005, WTO Special Edition. [Online] Available at: <http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/61212/c-fred-bergsten/rescuing-the-doha-round> [accessed September 2013].

            6. (2007) ‘Speech to the World Economic Forum’, Davos, 27 January.[Online] Available at: <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20070305103412/number10.gov.uk/page10858> [accessed September 2013].

            7. (2000) ‘From Suez to Tequila: The IMF as Crisis Manager’, The Economic Journal , 110 (1), 273–291.

            8. (2011) ‘Aid “With Chinese Characteristics”: Chinese Foreign Aid and Development Finance Meet the OECD-DAC Aid Regime’, Journal of International Development , 23 (5), 752–764.

            9. Brazilian Ministry of External Relations, (2011) ‘Avanza el proyecto del Banco del Sur’.

            10. and (2003) ‘New regionalism(s) in the global political economy. Conceptual understanding in historical perspective’, Asia Europe Journal , 1 (1), 167–182.

            11. BRIC Summit Joint Statement, April 2010.

            12. BRICS Sanya Declaration, 14 April 2011.

            13. BRICS Sanya Declaration, 14 April 2011.

            14. BRICS Summit Joint Statement, March 2012.

            15. (2012) ‘China as a “net donor”: tracking dollars and sense’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs , 25(4), 579–603.

            16. and (2012) ‘Introduction: rising states, rising donors and the global aid regime’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs , 25(4), 493–506.

            17. China Development Bank website. [Online] Available at: <http://www.cdb.com.cn/english/> [accessed September 2013].

            18. at al (2008) ‘How China delivers development assistance to Africa’, Report of the Centre for Chinese Studies prepared for the Department for International Development (DFID) . [Online] Available at: <http://www.ccs.org.za/downloads/DFID_FA_Final.pdf> [accessed September 2013].

            19. (2004) ‘The IMF and East Asia: a changing regional financial architecture’ in and (eds.), The IMF and Its Critics: Reform of Global Financial Architecture , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

            20. Declaration of the Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy, 15 November 2008. [Online] Available at: <http://www.un.org/ga/president/63/commission/declarationG20.pdf> [accessed September 2013].

            21. and (1993) Dollar Politics: Exchange Rate Policymaking in the United States , Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.

            22. Financial Times (2011), ‘EFSF head optimistic of China's support’, 28 October. [Online] Available at: <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0fe3e0c4-012e-11e1-ae24-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2h9gIHhJ4> [accessed September 2013].

            23. (2010) ‘Growing like China, Brazil seeks opportunities abroad’, Washington Post , 21 September. [Online] Available at: <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/20/AR2010092006176.html> [accessed September 2013].

            24. (2007) ‘Global Governance Beyond the G8: Reform Prospects for the Summit Architecture’, Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft , 2, 11–24. [Online] Available at: <http://www.fes.de/ipg/arc_07_set/set_02_07e.htm> [accessed September 2013].

            25. GR:EEN, (2013) Proceedings of the international conference ‘New Regional Powers: what Role for Europe?’, Rome, 20 May.

            26. and (2009) ‘Monetary and international factors behind Japan's lost decade’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies , 23(2), 200–219.

            27. et al (2007) ‘Decoupling the Train? Spillovers and Cycles in the Global Economy’, World Economic Outlook (April 2007), pp. 121–60.

            28. IBRD (2010) Voting Power Realignment. [Online] Available at: <http://siteresources.worldbank.org/NEWS/Resources/IBRD2010VotingPowerRealignmentFINAL.pdf> [accessed September 2013].

            29. IMF (2010a) ‘IMF Signs US$10 Billion Note Purchase Agreement with Brazil’, Press Release No. 10/14, 22 January.

            30. IMF (2010b) ‘IMF Executive Board Approves Major Overhaul of Quotas and Governance’, Press Release No. 10/418, 5 November.

            31. IMF (2011a) ‘Statement by the IMF Executive Directors Representing Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa on the Selection Process for Appointing an IMF Managing Director’, Press Release No. 11/195, 24 May.

            32. IMF (2011b) ‘Statement by IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde at the Conclusion of her Visit to Brazil’, Press Release No. 11/437, 1 December.

            33. IMF (2013a) World Economic Outlook Database , April.

            34. IMF (2013b) ‘Acceptances of the Proposed Amendment of the Articles of Agreement on Reform of the Executive Board and Consents to 2010 Quota Increase’, 4 June.

            35. IMF Quotas , 31 March 2013.

            36. (2007) ‘Asian Models for Aid: Is There a Non-Western Approach to Development Assistance?’, CMI Report , 12, pp. 1–10.

            37. (2005) ‘From G7 to G20: Capacity, Leadership and Normative Diffusion in Global Financial Governance’, Paper prepared for a panel on ‘Expanding Capacity and Leadership in Global Financial Governance: From G7 to G20,’ International Studies Association Annual Convention, March 1–5, Hawaii.

            38. et al (2008) ‘Global Business Cycles: Convergence or Decoupling?’, IMF Working Papers , No. 143.

            39. and (2003) ‘Power Transition Theory and the Rise of China’, International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations , 29(4), 269–271.

            40. (2010) ‘Capitalism in China: A Centrally Managed Capitalism (CMC) and Its Future’, Management and Organization Review , 7(1), 63–96.

            41. (1994) ‘Kokusaika, Nichibunken, and the question of Japan-bashing’, Asian Studies Review , 17(3), 166–172.

            42. MercoPress (2007) ‘Venezuelan financial support to region exceeds US aid’, 16 March.

            43. MercoPress (2009) ‘South American leaders sign agreement creating South Bank’, 27 September.

            44. et al (2007) ‘Developmental state and corporate governance in China’, Management and Organization Review , 3(1), pp. 19–53.

            45. ONE, Data Report 2010.

            46. (1958) World Politics . New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

            47. (2013) ‘The emergence of the BRICS – implications for global governance’, Journal of International and Global Studies , 4 (2), 37–51.

            48. (2011) ‘China's New Balkan Strategy’, Central Europe Watch (Washington: Center for Strategic & International Studies). [Online] Available at: <http://csis.org/files/publication/110829_CEW_China_in_Balkans.pdf> [accessed September 2013].

            49. and (2009) ‘Has Emerging Asia Decoupled? An Analysis of Production and Trade Linkages Using the Asian International Input-Output Table’, European Central Bank Working Papers , No 993.

            50. (2004) The Beijing Consensus . London: The Foreign Policy Center. [Online] Available at: <http://fpc.org.uk/fsblob/244.pdf> [accessed September 2013].

            51. (2012) ‘Brazil: Fresh cash for IMF hinges on reforms’ , 12 June. [Online] Available at: <http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/12/g20-brazil-idUSL1E8HCCE020120612> [accessed September 2013].

            52. (1996) ‘Voluntary Export Restraints, Antidumping Procedure, and Domestic Politics’, The American Economic Review , 86(3), 544–561.

            53. (2008) ‘Decoupling Debate Will Return: Emergers Dominate in Long Run’, Chatham House Briefing Note , IEP BN 08/01.

            54. (1998) ‘The IMF and the Asian Flu’, The American Prospect , 37, 16–21.

            55. , and (1996) ‘Financial Crises in Emerging Markets: The Lessons from 1995’, NBER Working Paper Series , No. 5576.

            56. (2004) Revitalizing the United Nations: Reform Through Weighted Voting . New York and The Hague: Institute for Global Policy World Federalist Movement.

            57. (2011) 'Non-DAC Donors and Humanitarian Aid: Shifting structures, changing trend, Global Humanitarian Assistance Briefing Paper , 07/2011.

            58. (2007) ‘East Asia's Counterweight Strategy: Asian Financial Cooperation and Evolving International Monetary Order,’ G-24 Discussion Paper Series – UN , No. 44.

            59. (2002) ‘ASEAN Plus Three - Emerging East Asian Regionalism?’, Asian Survey , 42(3), 440–455.

            60. et al, (2000) Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century Chatham: Chatham House.

            61. The Economist (2009) ‘Global economic imbalances: When a flow becomes a flood’, 22 January. [Online] Available at: <http://www.economist.com/node/12972083> [accessed September 2013].

            62. The Establishment of The Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization (2009), Joint Press Release, 28 December. [Online] Available at: <http://www.mof.go.jp/english/international_policy/financial_cooperation_in_asia/cmi/091228press_release.pdf> [accessed September 2013].

            63. , (ed.) (2006) ‘Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century’ , Washington DC: Institute of International Economics.

            64. UN (2002) Monterrey Consensus of the International Conference on Financing for Development . [Online] Available at: <http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/monterrey/MonterreyConsensus.pdf> [accessed September 2013].

            65. UN (2011) 66th General Assembly, 52nd Meeting , 9 November.

            66. (2009) ‘Copenhagen talks break down as developing nations split over “Tuvalu” protocol’, The Guardian , 9 December. [Online] Available at: <http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/dec/09/copenhagen-tuvalu-protocol-split> [accessed September 2013].

            67. (1990) Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

            68. (2008) ‘Whose aid? Whose influence? China, emerging donors and the silent revolution in development assistance’, International Affairs , 84(6), 1205–21.

            69. (2007) ‘Trade Politics Ain't What It Used to Be: The European Union in the Doha Round’, Journal of Common Market Studies , 45(4), 789–811.

            70. (2009) ‘International Institutional Performance in Crisis’, Chicago Journal of International Law , 10 (2).

            Comments

            Comment on this article