+1 Recommend
1 collections

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Journal of Global Faultlines is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Radical Transparency in Geopolitical Economy: WikiLeaks, Secret Diplomacy and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

      Journal of Global Faultlines
      Pluto Journals


            Author and article information

            Journal of Global Faultlines
            Pluto Journals
            March 2016
            : 3
            : 1
            : 1-15
            RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. E-mail: bkampmark@ 123456gmail.com
            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


            Social & Behavioral Sciences


            1. (2015) Activism on the Web: Everyday Struggles Against Digital Capitalism . New York: Routledge.

            2. (2011) “Introduction to ‘Secrecy and Transparency’ – The Politics of Opacity and Openness,” Theory, Culture and Society 29, 7–8 (Dec, 2011): 7–25;

            3. (2014) ‘Radical Transparency?’, Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies , 14 (1), 77–88.

            4. (2013) ‘Radical Transparency’, Internal Auditor , 70 (5), 67–69.

            5. and (2006) Freedom of Information: Balancing the Public Interest , 2nd ed. London: The Constitution Unit, UCL & Information Consultants.

            6. (2013) ‘Infotopia: Unleashing the Democratic Power of Transparency’, Politics & Society 41 (2), 183–212.

            7. (2014) No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the US Surveillance State . New York: Metropolitan Books.

            8. (2006) ‘Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research’, Communication Theory , 16, 4 (2006): 411–506, 423.

            9. and (2013) Democracy's Fourth Wave? Digital Media and the Arab Spring . New York: Oxford University Press.

            10. (2011) “What is the effect of WikiLeaks for Freedom of Information?” International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA), Jan 19. Available at http://www.ifla.org/publications/what-is-the-effect-of-wikileaks-for-freedom-of-information> [Accessed January 2016].

            11. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

            12. (2012) The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom . New York: Public Affairs.

            13. (2013) To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism . New York: Public Affairs.

            14. (2014a) ‘A Critical History of Internet Activism and Social Protest in Malaysia, 1998–2011’, Asiascape: Digital Asia Journal , 1-2, 78–103.

            15. (2014b) ‘Freedom Technologists and the New Protest Movements: A Theory of Protest Formulas’, Convergence 20 (3), 402–418.

            16. (2003) ‘The Cell Phone and the Crowd: Messianic Politics in the Contemporary Philippines’, Public Culture , 15 (3), 399–425.

            17. (1985) Technological Utopianism in American Culture . Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

            18. (2011) WikiLeaks and the Age of Transparency . Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.

            19. (2012) “What is Slack about Slactivism?” Paper for the Inter-Asia Roundtable on Methodological and Conceptual Issues in Cyber Activism Research, National University of Singapore.

            20. and (2012) ‘Social Media and the decision to participate in political protest in Egypt: Observations from Tahrir Square’, Journal of Communication , 62 (2), 363–379.


            Comment on this article