362
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Journal of Global Faultlines is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Foreign space activities in Argentina: Geopolitical imaginaries on the role of China and Europe in the national press (2007–2016)

      research-article
      1 , * ,
      Journal of Global Faultlines
      Pluto Journals
      media, geopolitics, imagining, space bases, China, Europe
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This article endeavors to understand the construction of a geopolitical imaginary over the People’s Republic of China deep space station on Bajada del Agrio, Province of Neuquén, from the perspective of geopolitics. This paper introduces a comparative perspective: the Chinese space facilities are not a unique case within the borders of this sovereign state: there is a similar space installation called Deep Space Antenna under European Union flag in Malargüe, Province of Mendoza. In order to track the construction of such geopolitical imagination, this article analyzes the discourses offered in newspapers of national circulation in the South American country: Clarín, La Nación, and Página/12 from 2007 to 2016. This work also describes and analyzes domestic and foreign political discourses, and the sources of information the media selects to explain the issues the facilities raise. Argentina is a state of the Global South with an autonomous track of space development. Acquiring technology from a rising power could be disruptive, generating tensions with the core states, which were former exclusive partners and clients.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.13169/jglobfaul.9.1.0083
            Journal of Global Faultlines
            GF
            Pluto Journals
            2054-2089
            2397-7825
            30 March 2022
            2022
            : 9
            : 1
            : 83-100
            Affiliations
            [1 ]National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Institute of Studies for Productive Development and Innovation (UNPAZ), José C. Paz, Buenos Aires, Argentina
            Author notes
            [* ] Correspondence: Daniel Blinder (Email: dblinder@ 123456unpaz.edu.ar )
            Article
            10.13169/jglobfaul.9.1.0083
            21283d85-2645-4930-bb55-a8b9f393ef5d

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Pages: 12
            Categories
            Articles

            Social & Behavioral Sciences
            Europe,China,space bases,imagining,geopolitics,media

            References

            1. (2005) Geopolítica. Una re-visión de la política mundial. Madrid: Trama.

            2. (2010) “Emerging China and Critical Geopolitics: Between World Politics and Chinese Particularity,” Eurasian Geography and Economics, 51(5), 569–582. doi:[Cross Ref]

            3. & (1995) Mastering Space. Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy. New York: Routledge.

            4. (2014) “Globalización, geopolítica, y tecnologías sensibles en situación periférica: tecnología misilística/espacial en la Argentina (1989–2012).” Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales.

            5. (2015) “Argentina Space: Ready for Launch,” Space and Defense Journal, 8(1), 34-46.

            6. (2008) “Imperialism, Domination, Culture: The Continued Relevance of Critical Geopolitics,” Geopolitics, 13(3), 413–436. doi:[Cross Ref]

            7. (2010) “Colonialism and Place Creation in Mars Pathfinder Media Coverage,” Geographical Review, 97(1), 112–130. doi:[Cross Ref]

            8. (2001) “Political Geography III: Critical Geopolitics After Ten Years,” Progress in Human Geography, 25(3), 469–484.

            9. (2005) Global Geopolitics. A Critical Introduction. Dorchester: Pearson.

            10. & (2008) “Sovereign Geopolitics? Uncovering the ‘Sovereignty Paradox,’” Geopolitics, 13(2), 309–334, DOI: [Cross Ref]

            11. (2020) Image, Reality and Media Construction: A Frame Analysis of German Media Representations of China. Singapore: Springer.

            12. (2006) Introduction to Geopolitics. London: Routledge.

            13. , & (2020) “Geopolítica y cooperación espacial: China y América del Sur,” Desafíos, 32(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.7669

            14. (2000) Los intelectuales y la organización de la cultura. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

            15. & (1998) Image, Perception, and the Making of U.S.–China Relations. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

            16. (2015) “Semi-Periphery and Capital-Intensive Advanced Technologies: How to Cite the Construction of Argentina as a Nuclear Proliferation Country,”. Journal of Communication Science, 14(2), A05.

            17. (2018) “A Brief History of Outer Space Cooperation Between Latin America and China,” Journal of Latin American Geography, 17 (2), 46–83. doi:[Cross Ref].

            18. (2001) “China in the Contemporary American Geopolitical Imagination,” Asian Affairs, 28(3), 138–145. doi:[Cross Ref]

            19. , & (2008) “Framing Policy Debates: Issue Dualism, Journalistic Frames, and Opinions on Controversial Policy Issues,” Communication Research, 35(5), 695–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321792

            20. & (2006) “Geopolitics, International Relations and Political Geography: The Politics of Geopolitical Discourse,” Geopolitics, 11(3), 349–366. doi:[Cross Ref]

            21. (2006) Estableciendo la Agenda. El impacto de los medios en la Opinión Pública y el Conocimiento. Barcelona: Paidos.

            22. (2016) “Circles of Steel, Castles of Vanity: The Geopolitics of Military Bases on the South China Sea,” Journal of Asian Studies, 75(4), 975–1017. doi:[Cross Ref]

            23. & (2014) “Understanding Message Framing and Effects,” in McLeod and Shah (eds.) News Frames and National Security: Covering Big Brother. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9–37. doi:[Cross Ref]

            24. & (1998) Rethinking Geopolitics. New York: Routledge.

            25. (2000) “The Postmodern Geopolitical Condition, States, Statecraft, and Security at the Millennium,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(1), 166–178. doi:[Cross Ref]

            26. (2004) “Knowledge as Power: Science, Military Dominance, and U.S. Security,” International Security, 29(1), 122–151.

            27. (2005) Ciencia, dinero y política. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

            28. (2002) “The Half-Life of Empire in Outer Space,” Social Studies of Science, 32(5–6), 791–825. doi:[Cross Ref]

            29. (2006) Is War Necessary for Economic Growth? Military Procurement and Technology Development. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

            30. (2008) “Framing Space: A Popular Geopolitics of American Manifest Destiny in Outer Space,” Geopolitics, 13(1), 27–53. doi:[Cross Ref]

            31. & (2002) Geografía política: Economía-Mundo, Estado-Nación y localidad, Madrid: Trama.

            32. (2007) “¿Preparado para enfrentar los conflictos de interés?,” Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad (CTS), 9(3). 189–209.

            33. & (2020) “Halting and Reversing Escalation in the South China Sea: A Bargaining Framework,” Global Policy, 11, 598–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12868

            34. & (2011) “What Shapes Americans’ Opinion of China? Country Characteristics, Public Relations and Mass Media,” Chinese Journal of Communication, 4(1), 1–20. doi:[Cross Ref]

            35. (2007) “Thoughts on Agenda Setting, Framing, and Priming,” Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x

            36. (2010) “The Rise of China: Media Perception and Implications for International Politics,” Journal of Contemporary China, 19(64), 233–254. doi:[Cross Ref]

            37. (2011). News Media and EU–China Relations (Palgrave Macmillan Series in International Political Communication). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

            Comments

            Comment on this article