This review identifies some of the pitfalls in assuming the dominant theories, constructions of race and power, and methodological tools scholars are left to inherit in their traditional disciplinary training. In a quest for a new episteme for Black life, Africana Studies created space for methodological frameworks such as Afrocentricity. This analysis offers examples through an Afrocentric methodology to confront and repair research on Black populations that assume othering, permanent dislocation from power, land, and authority- particular to Africans in diaspora, and methodological constraints around language and conceptual construction in research on Black life. An Afrocentric methodology can and should be advanced beyond scholarship proliferating within Africana Studies. Research considerations and questions that distinguish disciplinary method from methodology are discussed. Additionally, a new conceptual framing is offered here — cultural location, as a theoretical tool for historical and cultural examinations of African diasporic groups that applies the aforementioned reorientation toward humanizing research.
Local Meanings, Global Schooling. 2003. Palgrave Macmillan US. [Cross Ref]
Chambers Robert. Rural Development. 2014. Routledge. [Cross Ref]
Clifford James. Diasporas. Cultural Anthropology. Vol. 9(3):302–338. 1994. Wiley. [Cross Ref]
Fabian Johannes. Time and the Other. 2014. Columbia University Press. [Cross Ref]
Guridy Frank Andre. Forging Diaspora. 2010. University of North Carolina Press. [Cross Ref]
Routes of Passage. 2007. Michigan State University Press. [Cross Ref]
McDougal Serie. Africana Studies’ Epistemic Identity: An Analysis of Theory and Epistemology in the Discipline. Journal of African American Studies. Vol. 18(2):236–250. 2014. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. [Cross Ref]
Shukla Sandhya. Locations for South Asian Diasporas. Annual Review of Anthropology. Vol. 30(1):551–572. 2001. Annual Reviews. [Cross Ref]
Sanday Peggy Reeves. The Ethnographic Paradigm(s). Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 24(4)1979. JSTOR. [Cross Ref]