150
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Policy Perspectives is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals, and the authors don’t pay an author processing charge (APC’s).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Quest for Peace: Dealing with Militancy

      research-article
      Policy Perspectives: The Journal of the Institute of Policy Studies
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Considering the wide-ranging dynamics of militancy the country is faced with, dialogue and negotiated settlement — keeping in view the larger regional security context as well as long term structural aspects — provides the ideal way forward. Deterrence indeed is necessary to maintain and may be resorted to, where and when it is inevitable; keeping however in view that force can hardly provide a permanent solution to such multidimensional and long standing problem. While moving for dialogue devising a proper, well-though-out mechanism, with a logical end in view should be ensured. The role of traditional institution of jirga, and community elders is instrumental in this regard and must be pursued. International experiences stand testimony to the need for consistency and secrecy in such endeavors. And last but not the least, the people of militancy hit areas will have to be given a clear message that their developmental needs will be met, properly.

            The write-up is based primarily on deliberations of IPS roundtable “Negotiating Peace: Dealing with the Taliban — Current Status and Options” held on November 12, 2013. Following the Chatham House rules, the comments of the panelists and participants are being given unattributed. Important documents, national and international, related to the subject are also annexed. Editors are thankful to Ms. Fehmeedah Khalid, an IPS team member, for assistance provided in preparation of this write-up.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.13169
            polipers
            Policy Perspectives: The Journal of the Institute of Policy Studies
            Pluto Journals
            18121829
            18127347
            2014
            : 11
            : 1
            : 77-112
            Article
            polipers.11.1.0077
            10.13169/polipers.11.1.0077
            e2b52248-d4b8-4d07-ac47-7d680b6eb06c
            © 2014, Institute of Policy Studies

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History

            Education,Religious studies & Theology,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,Economics

            References

            1. Amnesty International. “Killing Outside the Bounds of Law?” Amnesty International . April 16, 2013. http://www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/issues/security-and-human-rights/drones (accessed March 19, 2014).

            2. Amnesty International. “Open Letter to President Obama.” Amnesty International . http://www.amnestyusa.org/pdfs/AIUSA_InvestigationsAndDisclosureDroneStrikesJanuary2014.pdf (accessed March 04, 2014).

            3. Awami National Party. “Joint Declaration of ANP's All Parties Conference for Peace.” ANP . http://awaminationalparty.org (accessed March 04, 2014).

            4. . “Amnesty International Calls on President Obama: Stop Evading Accountability for Potentially Unlawful Drone Killings.” Amnesty International . January 7, 2014. http://www.amnestyusa.org/news/press-releases/amnesty-international-calls-on-president-obama-stop-evading-accountability-for-potentially-unlawful (accessed March 19, 2014).

            5. . Ending the Vietnam War: A History of America's Involvement in and Extrication from the Vietnam War . New York: Simon and Schuster, 2003.

            6. National Assembly of Pakistan. “Consensus Resolution at the Conclusion of the In-Camera Joint Sitting of Parliament (8th Oct – 22th Oct 2008).” National Assembly . http://www.na.gov.pk/en/resolution_detail.php?id=39 (accessed 04 March 2014).

            7. National Assembly of Pakistan. “Resolution of the Joint Sitting of the Parliament on Unilateral U.S. Forces Action in Abbottabad on 2nd May 2011 (14th may 2011), National Assembly http://www.na.gov.pk/ (accessed March 04, 2014).

            8. The European Parliament. “European Parliament Resolution on the Use of Armed Drones.” The European Parliament . http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+MOTION+P7-RC-2014-0201+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=en (accessed March 14, 2014).

            9. UN General Assembly. “The Resolution of Human Rights Council: Promotion and Protection of all Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Including the Right to Development.” 25th Session, agenda no. 3. http://www.wilpfinternational.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/04/resolution.pdf (accessed March 28, 2014).

            Comments

            Comment on this article