381
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Policy Perspectives is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals, and the authors don’t pay an author processing charge (APC’s).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sino-Indian Border Conflict and Implications for Bilateral Relations

      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            The dynamism of Sino-Indian relations is a key determinant of the connectivity, geopolitics and geo-economics of the region and a driver of politics and economy of South Asia. China and India are collaborating with each other in multiple sectors but at the same time they are unable to resolve their border disputes. Due to that, tensions on the border are a routine matter. In June 2017, a border conflict escalated to a ten weeks military standoff at the Doklam Plateau, i.e., an area claimed by China and owned by Bhutan. There was a continuous threat that military stalemate will turn into a full-fledged war anytime but nevertheless the conflict ended without any major confrontation. There were certain factors including geopolitical situation, trade relations, economic ties, power imbalance and international image, etc. that led to de-escalation of conflict. The paper recommends that both the nations have to work on some permanent solutions for resolution of these territorial disputes because they may sabotage the peace process anytime affecting not only the bilateral relations but peace and harmony of the entire South Asian region.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.13169
            polipers
            Policy Perspectives: The Journal of the Institute of Policy Studies
            Pluto Journals
            18121829
            18127347
            2018
            : 15
            : 2
            : 57-69
            Affiliations
            Maira Qaddos, Ph.D. scholar in Institute of Communication Studies, University of the Punjab, Lahore. She is working as a visiting faculty member in the same institute and School of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Management Technology, Lahore.
            Article
            polipers.15.2.0057
            10.13169/polipers.15.2.0057
            b27e91da-8cc0-4b72-93a4-a0b49065cad4
            © 2018, Institute of Policy Studies

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History

            Education,Religious studies & Theology,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,Economics
            Territorial Disputes,Intraregional Connectivity,Geo-Economics,Geopolitical Situation,Bilateral Relations,Border Conflict

            References

            1. , “Revisiting the China-India Border Dispute: An Introduction,” China Report 47, no. 2 (2011): 65–69, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Westminster.

            2. and , “Sino-Indian Border Disputes,” Analysis , no. 181(2013): 1–9, http://www.ispionline.it/sites/default/files/pubblicazioni/analysis_181_2013.pdf

            3. , “The Sino-Indian Border Dispute and its Consequences for Asian Security”, Mundorama , March 25, 2016, https://www.mundorama.net/?p=19035.

            4. , “India Seals China Border Pact as Singh Hails Li Handshake,” Bloomberg , October 24, 2013, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-23/india-seals-border-pact-with-china-as-singh-hails-li-handshake.html

            5. and , “Indian and Chinese Troops Clash in Border dispute,” Financial Times , August 16, 2017, https://www.ft.com/content/01744eb2-8278-11e7-a4ce-15b2513cb3ff

            6. , “Former Indian Diplomat Says ‘Nothing Can Be Ruled Out’ In Border Spat with China,” CNBC , August 25, 2017, https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/25/exindian-diplomat-nothing-can-be-ruled-out-in-border-spat-with-china.html

            7. Ibid.

            8. Ibid.

            9. and , “India and China Agree to End Border Standoff,” Reuters , August 28, 2017, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-china/india-and-china-agree-to-end-border-standoff-idUSKCN1B80II

            10. and , “Sino-Indian Border Disputes.” Analysis No. 181, June 2013.

            11. , “Revisiting the China-India Border Dispute.” China Report, Saga Publications , Volume: 47 issue: 2, (2011) page(s): 65–69.

            12. , “China-India: An Analysis of the Himalayan Territorial Dispute,” Indo-Pacific Strategic Papers , February 2015, 1–31, http://www.defence.gov.au/ADC/Publications/IndoPac/Richards%20final%20IPSD%20paper.pdf

            13. , “Explaining Chinese Solutions to Territorial Disputes with Neighbour States,” Chinese Journal of International Politics 2, no. 4 (September 26, 2009):487–523, https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop007

            14. , “China-India: An Analysis of the Himalayan Territorial Dispute,” Indo-Pacific Strategic Papers , 2015 p. 3.

            15. and , “India and China: Conflict and Cooperation,” Survival 52, no. 1 (2010): 137–158, DOI 10.1080/00396331003612513.

            16. Ibid.

            17. and , “Sino-Indian Border Disputes,” Analysis No. 181, June 2013 p. 6.

            18. and , China and India: Cooperation or Conflict? (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2003), p. 17.

            19. , “Sino-Indian War 1962–Where Do India and China Stand Today?” (master's thesis, National Defense University Pakistan, 2011), 6, http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a589875.pdf

            20. Ibid.

            21. , “Explaining Chinese Solutions to Territorial Disputes with Neighbour States,” Chinese Journal of International Politics 2, no. 4 (September 26, 2009):487–523, https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop007

            22. Ibid.

            23. , “Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China's compromises in territorial disputes,” International Security 30, no. 2 (Fall 2005): 46, http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/016228805775124534

            24. , China and India; Prospects for Peace (Columbia University Press, 2009), 1.

            25. , “Why the Sino-Indian Border Dispute is Still Unresolved after 50 years: a recapitulation,” China Report 7, no. 2 (2011):71–82, http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/000944551104700202

            26. , “The Sino-Indian Border Dispute: What Role for the European Union?” European Institute for Asian Studies (EIAS) Briefing Paper , 2014. http://www.eias.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/EIAS_Briefing_Paper_2014-2_Das.pdf

            27. and , “India and China Agree to End Border Standoff,” Reuters, August 28, 2017.

            28. Insightsias, “Insights into Editorial: Doklam, China's Strategic Calculus and India's Policy Options,” August 12, 2017, http://www.insightsonindia.com/2017/08/12/insights-editorial-doklam-chinas-strategic-calculus-indias-policy-options/

            29. “India-China Doklam Standoff,” July 27, 2017 to Aug 02, 2017, http://www.hitbullseye.com/currentgk/1501152276.pdf.

            30. Insightsias, “Insights into Editorial.”

            31. , “In the Tri-Junction Entanglement, What Does Bhutan Want?” The Wire , July 11, 2017, https://thewire.in/diplomacy/bhutan-doklam-border-china

            32. Business Line, “India China Doklam Plateau Standoff,” IAS Parliament , July 06, 2017, http://www.iasparliament.com/article/india-china-doklam-plateau-standoff?q=bs

            33. ClearIAS.com, “India-China Border Disputes – What is the Doklam Issue?” August 11, 2017, http://www.clearias.com/india-china-border-disputes/

            34. , The Doklam Standoff between China and India is More Complex Than What is Made to Appear,” Defence Pakistan (blog), July 17, 2017, https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/the-doklam-standoff-between-china-and-india-is-more-complex-that-what-is-made-to-appear.507105/

            35. Ibid.

            36. and , “China's Himalayan “Mission Creep,” DPG Policy Note II, issue 6 (July 12, 2017): 1–6, http://www.delhipolicygroup.org/uploads_dpg/publication_file/dpg-policy-note-vol-ii-issue-6-chinas-himalayan-mission-creep-1050.pdf

            37. “India-China Doklam Standoff”

            38. , “In the Tri-Junction Entanglement, What Does Bhutan Want?” The Wire , July 11, 2017, https://thewire.in/156180/bhutan-doklam-border-china/

            39. Ibid.

            40. , “The Bhutan Standoff is an Opportunity, not a Threat,” The Wire , July 10, 2017, https://thewire.in/155911/bhutan-china-modi-border-opportunity/

            41. , “In the Tri-Junction Entanglement.”

            42. , “Too Much Dragon, too Little Kingdom,” The Hindu , July 12, 2016, https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/too-much-dragon-too-little-kingdom/article4918267.ece

            43. , “Doklam Standoff: Misunderestimating Bhutan's Sovereignty,” The Wire , July 21, 2017, https://thewire.in/159651/doklam-standoff-india-china-bhutan/

            44. , “Order from Chaos: Navigating the Current China-India Standoff in Bhutan,” Brookings , July 28, 2017, https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2017/07/28/navigating-the-current-china-india-standoff-in-bhutan/

            45. “China-India Standoff: A Look at Key Background of Dispute,” The Economic Times , July 25, 2017, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/doklam-standoff-a-look-at-key-background-of-the-dispute/articleshow/59748578.cms

            46. , “Order from Chaos.”

            47. , “There's a Standoff between China and India in the Himalayas. Both Sides Explain,” World Economic Forum , August 16, 2017, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/08/there-s-a-standoff-between-china-and-india-in-the-himalayas-both-sides-explain/

            48. , “There's a Standoff between China and India in the Himalayas. Both Sides Explain,” World Economic Forum , August 16, 2017, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/08/there-s-a-standoff-between-china-and-india-in-the-himalayas-both-sides-explain/

            49. , “Is India's Military Actually Ready for War With China?,” The Diplomat , August 10, 2017, http://thediplomat.com/2017/08/is-indias-military-actually-ready-for-war-with-china/

            50. “A Sino-Indian Armed Conflict: Why China can Bark But can't Bite,” The Economic Times , July 06, 2017, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/a-sino-indian-armed-conflict-why-china-can-bark-but-cant-bite/articleshow/59471122.cms

            51. Ibid.

            52. , “Indresh Kumar Calls for boycott of Chinese Products,” The Indian Express , July 28, 2017, https://indianexpress.com/article/india/indresh-kumar-calls-for-boycott-of-chinese-products-4770709/

            53. , “Indian Realism Challenges Calls to Ban China Imports,” The New Indian Express , August 07, 2017, http://www.newindianexpress.com/business/2017/aug/07/indian-realism-challenges-calls-to-ban-china-imports-1639412–1.html

            54. “Boycott of Chinese goods: How it will not Help India but can Harm China,” The Economic Times , Jul 11, 2017, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/boycott-of-chinese-goods-how-it-wont-help-india-but-can-harm-china/articleshow/59541915.cms

            55. , “If India stops trading with China, how will it affect the Chinese and Indian economies?” Quora , October 21, 2016, https://www.quora.com/If-India-stops-trading-with-China-how-will-it-effect-the-Chinese-and-Indian-economies

            56. , “Sikkim Border Dispute: another War with India will be an Economic Blunder of China,” Firstpost , July 10, 2017, http://www.firstpost.com/india/sikkim-border-dispute-another-war-with-india-will-be-an-economic-blunder-for-china-3796365.html

            57. , “Will the Doklam Standoff Lead to a Second India-China War?,” The Diplomat , July 18, 2017, http://thediplomat.com/2017/07/will-the-doklam-standoff-lead-to-a-second-india-china-war/

            58. , “Sikkim Border Dispute,”

            59. “Doklam standoff: India has Pulled Back All Border Personnel, Equipment From Site, Says Chinese FM,” The Indian express , August 28, 2017, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/doklam-disengagement-live-updates-china-says-indian-forces-have-withdrawn-4817275/

            60. “China non-committal on halting road construction in Dokalam,” The Economic Times , August 29, 2017, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/china-evasive-on-road-construction-in-doklam/articleshow/60275622.cms

            61. , “Tensions Diffused: China Willing to Reopen Nathu La Pass to Indian Pilgrims,” The Dilpomat , September 14, 2017, http://thediplomat.com/2017/09/tensions-diffused-china-willing-to-reopen-nathu-la-pass-to-indian-pilgrims/

            62. , “China Willing to discuss Reopening Nathu La Pass with India,” Global times , September 13, 2017, http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1066135.shtml

            Comments

            Comment on this article