574
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Policy Perspectives is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals, and the authors don’t pay an author processing charge (APC’s).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clash of Identities : Ontological (In)Securities of Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the Repercussions

      Published
      research-article
      1
      Policy Perspectives
      Ontological Security, State Identity, Pakistan and Afghanistan, Pashtuns, Pashtun Identity
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            The notion of security denotes freedom from threats. Ontological security implies emancipation from threats to core values that identify a person or a state. This article demonstrates the Pak-Afghan relationship as a case in point. It offers a relatively new perspective for understanding the continued contentious relationship between Afghanistan and Pakistan. It argues that the Pashtun state identity of Afghanistan mismatches with the Islamic identity of Pakistan. This causes cognitive anxiety over self-identity in both states, which confronts their respective ontological (in)security challenges. Consequently, both countries engage in dangerous routines of self-identity affirmation to manage their ontological (in)securities. The routines often have harmful consequences for the civilian population, especially in the Pashtun areas of Pakistan.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Policy Perspectives
            1812-7347
            16 November 2022
            : 19
            : 2
            : 1-20
            Affiliations
            [1 ] The University of Tromsø – UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway;
            Article
            10.13169/polipers.19.2.ra1
            380f9203-6fc4-4803-a13a-b41f5bb31198
            © 2022 Farhat Taj

            Published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International ( CC BY 4.0). Users are allowed to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially), as long as the authors and the publisher are explicitly identified and properly acknowledged as the original source.

            History
            Categories

            Political science
            Ontological Security, State Identity, Pakistan and Afghanistan,Pashtuns,Pashtun Identity

            References

            1. Eberle Jakub, Handl Vladimír. Ontological Security, Civilian Power, and German Foreign Policy Toward Russia1. Foreign Policy Analysis. Vol. 16(1):41–58. 2020. Oxford University Press (OUP). [Cross Ref]

            2. Mitzen Jennifer. Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 12(3):341–370. 2006. SAGE Publications. [Cross Ref]

            3. Chernobrov Dmitry. Ontological Security and Public (Mis)Recognition of International Crises: Uncertainty, Political Imagining, and the Self. Political Psychology. Vol. 37(5):581–596. 2016. Wiley. [Cross Ref]

            4. Bayly Martin J.. Imperial ontological (in)security: ‘Buffer states’, International Relations and the case of Anglo-Afghan relations, 1808–1878. European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 21(4):816–840. 2015. SAGE Publications. [Cross Ref]

            5. Ahady Anwar-ul-Haq. The Decline of the Pashtuns in Afghanistan. Asian Survey. Vol. 35(7):621–634. 1995. University of California Press. [Cross Ref]

            6. Zarakol Ayşe. Ontological (In)security and State Denial of Historical Crimes: Turkey and Japan. International Relations. Vol. 24(1):3–23. 2010. SAGE Publications. [Cross Ref]

            7. Taj Farhat. Stable Regime, Historiography and Truth Commissions. Review of Human Rights. Vol. 7(1):67–88. 2020. Review of Human Rights (RHR). [Cross Ref]

            8. Mitzen Jennifer. Anchoring Europe's civilizing identity: habits, capabilities and ontological security1. Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 13(2):270–285. 2006. Informa UK Limited. [Cross Ref]

            9. Christine Fair C., Nawaz Shuja. The Changing Pakistan Army Officer Corps. Journal of Strategic Studies. Vol. 34(1):63–94. 2011. Informa UK Limited. [Cross Ref]

            10. Mirza Muhammad Nasrullah, Mushtaq Naveed. Utilizing Militia Forces in Modern Warfare: Role and Challenges. Policy Perspectives. Vol. 18(1)2021. Pluto Journals. [Cross Ref]

            Comments

            Comment on this article