+1 Recommend
1 collections

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Knowledge dialogues for better health: complementarities between health innovation studies and health disciplines



            Health innovation studies and the health disciplines highlight the importance of using knowledge to improve human welfare. However, these disciplines rarely yield discussion about this issue. The objective of this paper is to establish a dialogue between health innovation studies and the health disciplines, and to reveal the complementarities between these approaches. We present a revision of selected models of health knowledge use. From health innovation studies, we consider two models focused on the nature of health innovation, and two others that orient health innovation studies towards addressing inclusive development issues. From the health disciplines, we analyse translational research and knowledge translation models. Using a systemic perspective, we structure our analysis of complementarities on four analytical dimensions:

            (i) The actors, proposing the recognition of the public sector, the productive sector, the scientific community, and health services providers. We also define two dynamic actors: knowledge users and knowledge beneficiaries.

            (ii) The interactions, considering them as asymmetrical to facilitate knowledge flows.

            (iii) The process, based on specific models of healthcare activities and a broad set of validation mechanisms (not only market-related).

            (iv) The institutional framework, proposing consideration of formal institutions (e.g. regulations) and informal institutions (e.g. socio-cultural background).


            Author and article information

            Pluto Journals
            1 March 2020
            : 36
            : 1 ( doiID: 10.13169/prometheus.36.issue-1 )
            : 30-50
            [ 1 ]CONACYT-Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico City, Mexico
            [ 2 ]Economics, Management and Policy of Innovation Postgraduate Program, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico City, Mexico
            [ 3 ]Collective Health and Social Medicine Postgraduate Program, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico
            © 2020 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            Custom metadata

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics


            1. Globelics is a worldwide community of scholars working on innovation and competence building in the context of economic development (www.globelics.org).

            2. Physical technologies are the set of material resources necessary for the generation of a product or service. In drug development, physical technologies would be the active components present in medicine. Social technologies consist of forms of human organization necessary for the production process, labour division, assignment of responsibilities and even the way in which the products or services will be used.

            3. The knowledge transfer tradition has offered a linear vision in which the Academy was responsible of producing knowledge that firms should incorporate into their productive processes. Nevertheless, the concept has evolved, opening the door for transfer activities among different actors and in multiple directions (Casas, 2005).


            Comment on this article