183
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Book review

      review-essay
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.2307/j50022063
            prometheus
            Prometheus
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            1 September 2020
            : 36
            : 3 ( doiID: 10.13169/prometheus.36.issue-3 )
            : 277-288
            Affiliations
            Giles Birchley Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, UK giles.birchley@ 123456bristol.ac.uk
            Article
            prometheus.36.3.0277
            10.13169/prometheus.36.3.0277
            12f95665-6c20-414d-a153-60ee6080f37d
            © 2020 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Product

            Empirical Bioethics: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives , , and (eds) (2016) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, xiii +274pp., £93, hardback, ISBN: 9781107078475

            Custom metadata
            eng

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics

            References

            1. Davies, R., Ives, J. and Dunn, M. (2015) ‘A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies’, BMC Medical Ethics, 16, 15.

            2. De Vries, R. (2004) ‘How can we help? From “sociology in” to “sociology of” bioethics’, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 32, 2, pp.279–92.

            3. Dewey, J. (1917) ‘The need for a recovery of philosophy’ in Boydston, J. (ed.) (1980) John Dewey, The Middle Works 1899–1924, vol. 10, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, 1980.

            4. Doris, J. (2002) Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behaviour, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

            5. Fulford, B. (2004) ‘Facts/values: ten principles of values-based medicine’ in Radden, J. (ed.) International Perspectives in Philosophy and Psychiatry. The Philosophy of Psychiatry: A Companion, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.205–34.

            6. Hedgecoe, A. (2002) ‘Critical bioethics: beyond the social science critique of applied ethics’, Bioethics, 18, 2, pp.120–43.

            7. Heidegger, M. (1968) (trans Gray, J.) What is Called Thinking, Harper & Row, New York.

            8. Ives, J. and Draper, H. (2009) ‘Appropriate methodologies for empirical bioethics: it's all relative’, Bioethics, 23, 4, pp.249–58.

            9. Majid, U. and Vanstone, M. (2018) ‘Appraising qualitative research for evidence syntheses: a compendium of quality appraisal tools’, Qualitative Health Research, 28, 13, pp.2115–31.

            10. Miller, C. (2013) Moral Character: An Empirical Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

            Comments

            Comment on this article