+1 Recommend
1 collections

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Book review

      Pluto Journals


            Author and article information

            Pluto Journals
            1 December 2020
            : 36
            : 4 ( doiID: 10.13169/prometheus.36.issue-4 )
            : 396-402
            Department of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka. priyan@ 123456uom.lk
            © 2020 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


            Steps Toward a Philosophy of Engineering: Historico-Philosophical and Critical Essays by (2020) 445pp., £130 (hardback) £35 (paperback) Rowman & Littlefield, London, ISBN 978-1-78661-126-0

            Custom metadata

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics


            1. Aristotle (2000) Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Crisp, R., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

            2. Blockley, D. (2010) ‘The importance of being process’, Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 27, 3, pp.189–99.

            3. Blockley, D. (2020) Building Bridges between Theory and Practice, World Scientific, London.

            4. Cook, S. (1995) ‘The structure of technological revolutions and the Gutenberg myth’ in Pitt, J. (ed.) New Directions in the Philosophy of Technology, Springer, Dordrecht.

            5. Coyne, R. (1995) Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age: From Method to Metaphor, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

            6. Davis, M. (1998) Thinking like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession, Oxford University Press, New York.

            7. De Neufville, R. and Scholtes, S. (2011) Flexibility in Engineering Design, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

            8. Dias, P. (2014) ‘The disciplines of engineering and history: some common ground’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 2, pp.539–49.

            9. Dias, P. (2019) Philosophy for Engineering: Practice, Context, Ethics, Models, Failure, Springer Nature, Singapore.

            10. Dias, W.P.S. (1994) ‘Structural failures and design philosophy’, Structural Engineer, 72, 2, pp.25–9.

            11. Dias, W.P.S. (2006) ‘Heidegger's resonance with engineering: the primacy of practice’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 3, pp.523–32.

            12. Dym, C. and Little, P. (1999) Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, Wiley, New York.

            13. Florman, S. (1994) The Existential Pleasures of Engineering, St Martin's Press, New York.

            14. Goldman, S. (2018) ‘Compromised exactness and the rationality of engineering’ in Garcia-Diaz, C. and Olaya, C. (eds) Social Systems Engineering: The Design of Complexity, Wiley, Oxford, pp.13–29.

            15. Herkert, J. (2001) ‘Future directions in engineering ethics research: microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 3, pp.403–14.

            16. Howarth, D. (2013) Law as Engineering: Thinking about What Lawyers Do, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

            17. Jaspers, K. (1953) Origin and Goal of History (Bullock, M. trans.), Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

            18. Joy, B. (2000) ‘Why the future doesn't need us’, Wired, 8, 4, pp.238–62.

            19. Koen, B. (1985) Definition of the Engineering Method, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington DC.

            20. Li, B. (2008) ‘Categorical imperative ethics and coordinated ethics: the 4th discussion on engineering ethics’, Studies in Ethics, 5, pp.42–8.

            21. Long, C. (2002) ‘The ontological reappropriation of phronesis’, Continental Philosophy Review, 35, pp.35–60.

            22. Mitcham, C. (1994) Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

            23. Petroski, H. (1969) To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design, St Martin's Press, New York.

            24. Simon, H. (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

            25. Vincenti, W. (1990) What Engineers Know and How they Know it: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore.

            26. Wimsatt, W. (2007) Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.


            Comment on this article