907
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The cult of the quantifiable: the fetishism of numbers in higher education

      Published
      research-article
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This paper examines the 'fetishism of numbers' (Gudeman, 1998, p.1) that has taken hold in restructured, market-oriented institutions of higher education. As all areas of academic life have been rendered down to the quantifiable, and university environments have become dominated by the rituals of counting, numbers have been imbued with a potency of almost preternatural proportions. The points of comparison between the power ascribed to the numerical in diverse mystical, magical practices and the overriding significance accorded to numbers in restructured universities are explored. When the near-obsessive focus on numbers is viewed as a form of fetishism, some of the reasons why numbers have been elevated to a position of excessive importance come to the fore, as does the illogical nature of such reasoning. Although numbers have been valorized on account of their ostensible accuracy, transparency, objectivity and impartiality, this study contends that the present-day fetishism of numbers in higher education is neither rational nor practical. Neither does it ensure fairness and accuracy. Instead, it stems from and fosters delusion, deception, inequity and irrationality, vanity and greed.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Journal
            10.2307/j50022063
            prometheus
            Prometheus
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            1 March 2021
            : 37
            : 1 ( doiID: 10.13169/prometheus.37.issue-1 )
            : 8-26
            Affiliations
            Department of English, University of Fort Hare, South Africa
            Article
            prometheus.37.1.0008
            10.13169/prometheus.37.1.0008
            269c4b87-e940-4e7c-9ea3-3d209d18a157
            © 2020 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Custom metadata
            eng

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics

            References

            1. Aitchison, J. (2015) 'Unscrupulous academics buy into “university 419 scam”', Mail & Guardian, 11–17 December, p.31.

            2. Alvesson, M., Yiannis, G. and Paulsen, R. (2017) Returning to Meaning: A Social Science with Something to Say, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

            3. Amsler, S. (2013) 'University ranking: a dialogue on turning towards alternatives', Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 13, pp.3–14.

            4. Anon. (2020) Beall's List of Potentially Predatory Journals and Publishers, available from https://beallslist.net (accessed August 2020).

            5. Anthony, P. (1994) Managing Culture, Open University Press, Buckingham.

            6. Appadurai, A. (1986) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

            7. Apter, E. (1991) 'Fetishism in theory: Marx, Freud, Baudrillard' in Apter, E. (ed.) Feminizing the Fetish: Psychoanalysis and Narrative Obsession in Turn–of–the–Century France, Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY, pp.1–14.

            8. Baudrillard, J. (1981) For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign, Telos, New York, pp.88–101.

            9. Beall, J. (2017) 'What I learned from predatory publishers', Biochemia Medica, 27, 2, pp.273–8.

            10. Berg, M. and Seeber, B. (2016) The Slow Professor: Changing the Culture of Speed in the Academy, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

            11. Bernault, F. (2013) 'Witchcraft and the colonial life of the fetish' in Meier, B. and Stanforth, A. (eds) Spirits in Politics: Uncertainties of Power and Healing, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, pp.49–70.

            12. Bertelsen, E. (1998) 'The real transformation: the marketisation of higher education', Social Dynamics, 24, 2, pp.130–58.

            13. Burrows, R. (2012) 'Living with the H–index? Metric assemblages in the contemporary academy', Sociological Review, 60, 2, pp.355–72.

            14. Chang, H.–J. (2010) 23 Things they Didn't Tell you about Capitalism, Penguin, London.

            15. Cheryl, S. (2016) 'When OCD turns life into a numbers game', available from https://obsessive-compulsive-disorder-ocd/ (accessed October 2019).

            16. Collini, S. (2012) What are Universities for? Penguin, London.

            17. Collini, S. (2016) 'Who are the spongers now?', London Review of Books, 38, 2, available at https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v38/n02/stefan-collini/who-are-the-spongers-now (accessed November 2020).

            18. Conley, J. (2011) 'Comment' in Merry, S. (ed.) 'Measuring the world: indicators, human rights and global governance', Current Anthropology, 52, S3, pp.593–4.

            19. Dant, T. (1996) 'Fetishism and the social value of objects', Sociological Review, 44, 3, pp.495–516.

            20. Debord, G. (1983) Society of the Spectacle, Black and Red, Detroit MI.

            21. Elliott, L. and Atkinson, D. (2007) Fantasy Island: Waking up to the Incredible Economic, Political and Social Illusions of the Blair Legacy, Constable, London.

            22. Fernandes, C. (2011) 'Performance appraisal – a key business tool or an annual ritual?', available at http://www.shrmindia.org/hr–buzz/blogs/shrm–india/performance–appraisal–%E2%80%93–key–business–tool (accessed December 2012).

            23. Freud, S. (1927) 'Fetishism' in Miscellaneous Papers: 1888–1938, Collected Papers, 5, Hogarth and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, London, available at https://cpb–us–w2.wpmucdn.com (accessed September 2019).

            24. Gallup, G. and Svare, B. (2016) 'Hijacked by an external funding mentality', Inside Higher Education, 25 July, available at https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/07/25/undesirable–consequences–growing–pressure–faculty–get–grants–essay (accessed June 2020).

            25. Geschiere, P. (2003) 'On witch doctors and spin doctors: the role of “experts” in African and American politics' in Meyer, B. and Pels, P. (eds) Magic and Modernity: Interfaces of Revelation and Concealment, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA, pp.159–82.

            26. Giroux, H. (2007) The University in Chains: Confronting the Military–Industrial–Academic Complex, Paradigm, Boulder CO.

            27. Gladwell, M. (2011) 'The order of things: what college rankings really tell us', New Yorker, 6 February, available at https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/02/14/the–order–of–things(accessed September 2019).

            28. Greene, F., Loughridge, F. and Wilson, T. (1996) The Management Information Needs of Academic Heads of Department in Universities: A Critical Success Factors Approach. A Report for the British Library Research and Development Department, Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield.

            29. Grove, L. (2017) 'The effects of funding policies on academic research', PhD thesis, University College London, available from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/88207/ (accessed June 2020).

            30. Gudeman, S. (1998) 'The new captains of information', Anthropology Today, 14, 1, February, pp.1–3.

            31. Head, S. (2011) 'The grim threat to British universities', New York Review of Books, 13 January, available at https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2011/01/13/grim-threat-british-universities/ (accessed November 2020).

            32. Jerven, M. (2013) Poor Numbers: How we are Misled by African Development Statistics and What to Do about it, UCT Press, Cape Town.

            33. Johnson, J. and Podsakoff, P. (1994) 'Journal influence in the field of management: an analysis using Salancik's Index in a dependency network', Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp.1392–1407.

            34. Lawrence, P. (2007) 'The mismeasurement of science', Current Biology, 17, 15, pp.583–5.

            35. Lindgren, L. (2011) 'If Robert Merton said it, it must be true: a citation analysis in the field of performance measurement', Evaluation, 17, 1, pp.7–19.

            36. Lindstrom, L. (1993) Cargo Cults: Strange Stories of Desire from Melanesia and Beyond, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.

            37. Lock, G. and Martins, H. (2011) 'Quantified control and the mass production of “psychotic citizens”', EspacesTemps.net, available at http://espacestemps.net/document8555.html (accessed October 2017).

            38. Macdonald, S. and Kam, J. (2007) 'Ring a ring o' roses: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies', Journal of Management Studies, 44, 4, pp.640–55.

            39. Maguire, M. (2015) 'New questions of evidence', Current Anthropology, 56, 3, pp.434–5.

            40. Maluleke, T. (2011) 'Lacklustre means, miniscule output', Mail & Guardian, 29 April–5 May, p.29.

            41. Marginson, S. (2014) 'UK research is getting better all the time – or is it?' Guardian, 23 December, available at https://www.theguardian.com/higher–education–network/2014/dec/23/ref–uk–research–excellence–getting–better–higher–education (accessed August 2019).

            42. Marx, K. (1976) Capital: Volume 1, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

            43. McKenna, S. (2011) 'Excellence is excellent. Isn't it?' Mail & Guardian: Getting Ahead (South Africa) 28 January–3 February, p.3.

            44. McNally, D. (2012) Monsters of the Market: Zombies, Vampires and Global Capitalism, Haymarket, Chicago IL.

            45. Merry, S. (2011) 'Measuring the world: indicators, human rights and global governance', Current Anthropology, 52, S3, pp.583–95.

            46. Merton, R. (1988) 'The Matthew effect in science, II: cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property', Isis, 79, pp.606–23.

            47. Muller, J. (2018) The Tyranny of Metrics, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

            48. Naidoo, R. (2018) 'The competition fetish in higher education: shamans, mind snares and consequences', European Educational Research Journal, 17, 5, pp.605–20.

            49. Nash, A. (2006) 'Restructuring South African universities' in Pithouse, R. (ed.) Asinamali: University Struggles in Post-Apartheid South Africa, Africa World Press, Trenton, IL, and Asmara, pp.1–10.

            50. Olssen, M. and Peters, M. (2005) 'Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism', Journal of Education Policy, 20, 3, pp.313–45.

            51. Ordorika, I. (2009) 'Commitment to society: contemporary challenges for public research universities' in GUNI (Global University Network for Innovation), Higher Education at a Time of Transformation: New Dynamics for Social Responsibility, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp.72–4.

            52. Orr, L. (1997) 'Globalisation and universities: towards “the market university”?', Social Dynamics, 23, pp.42–67.

            53. Otto, T. (2004) 'Work, wealth and knowledge: enigmas of cargoist identifications' in Jebens, H. (ed.) Cargo, Cult, and Culture Critique, University of Hawai'i Press, Honolulu, pp.209–26.

            54. Ozga, J. (2011) 'The entrepreneurial researcher: re-formations of identity in the research marketplace', International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8, 2, pp.143–53.

            55. Parker, M. (2014) 'University, Ltd: changing a business school', Organization, 21, pp.281– 92.

            56. Parker, M. and Jary, D. (1995) 'The McUniversity: organization, management and academic subjectivity', Organization, 2, pp.319–38.

            57. Pels, P. (2003) 'Introduction' in Meyer, B. and Pels, P. (eds) Magic and Modernity: Interfaces of Revelation and Concealment, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA, pp.1–38.

            58. Peters, M. (1992) 'Performance and accountability in “post–industrial society”: the crisis of British universities', Studies in Higher Education, 17, 2, pp.123–39.

            59. Pietz, W. (1985) 'The problem of the fetish, I', RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 9, pp.5–17.

            60. Pietz. W. (1987) 'The problem of the fetish, II: the origin of the fetish', RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 13, pp.23–45.

            61. Pietz, W. (1993) 'Fetishism and materialism' in Apter, E. and Pietz, W. (eds) Fetishism as Cultural Discourse, Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY, pp.119–51.

            62. Porter, T. (1996) 'Making things quantitative' in Power, M. (ed.) Accounting and Science: Natural Inquiry and Commercial Reason, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp.36–56.

            63. Pusser, B. and Marginson, S. (2013) 'University rankings in critical perspective', Journal of Higher Education, 84, 4, pp.544–68.

            64. Readings, B. (1996) The University in Ruins, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

            65. Ritzer, G. (1996) 'McUniversity in the postmodern consumer society', Quality in Higher Education, 2, 3, pp.185–99.

            66. Ritzer, G. (1999) Enchanting a Disenchanted World: Revolutionising the Means of Consumption, Pine Forge Press, London.

            67. Roper, I. (2004) 'Managing quality in public services: some distinct implications for the re–organisation of work' in Dibben, P., Wood, G. and Roper, I. (eds) Contesting Public Sector Reforms: Critical Perspectives; International Debates, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp.120–36.

            68. Ruth, D. (2001) 'Academic workload, performance appraisal and staff development: issues of quantification, criteria, perception and affect', Acta Academica, 33, 1, pp.194–216.

            69. Sauder, M. and Espeland, W. (2015) 'On the audit trail' in Shore, C. and Wright, S. 'Audit culture revisited: rankings, ratings and the reassembling of society', Current Anthropology, 56, 3, pp.436–7.

            70. Seidenberg, A. (1962) 'The ritual origin of counting', Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 2, 1, pp.1–40.

            71. Shattock, M. (2018) 'Better informing the market? The Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) in British higher education', International Higher Education, 92, pp.21–2.

            72. Shore, C. and Wright, S. (1999) 'Audit culture and anthropology: neoliberalism in British higher education', Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5, pp.557–73.

            73. Shore, C. and Wright, S. (2015) 'Audit culture revisited: rankings, ratings and the reassembling of society', Current Anthropology, 56, 3, pp.421–44.

            74. Sikhakhane, J. (2016) 'Higher education, low returns', Sunday Times, Business Times, 21 February, p.11.

            75. Smith, W. (1744) A New Voyage to Guinea, Nourse, London.

            76. Southall, R, and Cobbing, J. (2001) 'From racial liberalism to corporate authoritarianism: the Shell affair and the assault on academic freedom in South Africa', Social Dynamics, 27, 2, pp.1–42.

            77. Spence, C. (2019) '”Judgement” versus “metrics” in higher education management', Higher Education, 77, 5, available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734–018–0300–z (accessed May 2019).

            78. Stewart, P. (2007) 'Re–envisioning the academic profession in the shadow of corporate managerialism', Journal of Higher Education in Africa, 5, 4, pp.131–47.

            79. Tanaka, M. (2011) 'Fetishism: a double denial', ZINBUN, 42, pp.131–46.

            80. Tourish, D. and Willmott, H. (2015) 'In defiance of folly: journal rankings, mindless measures and the ABS Guide', Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 26, pp.37–46.

            81. Willmott, H. (2011) 'Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: reactivity and the ABS list', Organization, 18, 4, pp.429–42.

            82. Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S., Jones, R., Kain, R., Kerridge, S., Thelwall, M., Tinkler, J., Viney, I., Wouters, P., Hill, J. and Johnson. B. (2015) The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management, HEFCE, London.

            83. Wood, F. (2010a) 'Occult innovations in higher education: corporate magic and the mysteries of managerialism', Prometheus, 28, 3, pp.227–44.

            84. Wood, F. (2010b) 'Sorcery in the academy', Southern African Journal for Folklore Studies, 20, 1, pp.4–28.

            85. Wood, F. (2018) Universities and the Occult Rituals of the Corporate World: Higher Education and Metaphorical Parallels with Myth and Magic, Routledge, London.

            86. Yiannis, G. (2012) 'Under new management: subjects, objects and hubris, new and old', Nouvelle Revue de Psychosociologie, 13, pp.241–64, available at https://www.cairn.info/revue-nouvelle-revue-de-psychosociologie-2012-1-page-241.htm (accessed November 2020).

            87. Zami (2008) 'Counting ritual', available at https://www.mentalhelp.net/advice–counting–ritual–zami–aug–30th–2008 (accessed October 2019).

            Comments

            Comment on this article