For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
482
views
66
references
 Top references
cited by
0
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      376
      similar
       All similar

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals. Furthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_

      Prometheus

      Volume 37, Issue 4
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Farmer-driven innovation: lessons from a case study of subterranean clover seed production

      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Farmers are often overlooked and undervalued as sources of innovation, but can be powerful drivers of ingenuity and development. We evaluate historical developments in the Australian subterranean clover seed-production industry as a case study of farmer-driven innovation. Subterranean clover seed machinery patents (75% of which were patented by farmers) are analysed using conventional innovation frameworks, such as the theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ), to extract lessons for supporting farmer-driven innovation. The small scale of this industry, compared with mainstream cereal-cropping industries and the isolation of farmers, provides analogous lessons for agriculture in developing countries. Economic drivers are important in enabling farmer innovation and the value proposition for developing new inventions must be clear to justify the time and expense. Farmers are different from firms and their on-farm knowledge and experience can form an essential part of innovation. Drivers of innovation also differ, with farmers less likely to attempt to commercialize inventions. Farmers can also be hesitant to share their inventions, instead holding them as trade secrets in competitive industries. Support and collaboration are needed from government and researchers to assist in commercialization or dissemination of useful innovations and to prevent knowledge from being confined to a localized farmer or region. Advances in agriculture require farmer input in research and development, but the benefits will be greater if farmers are enabled to be drivers of innovation.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Journal ID (doi): 10.13169/prometheus.37.4.0353
            Title: Prometheus
            Abbreviated Title: PROM
            Publisher: Pluto Journals
            ISSN (Electronic): 1470-1030
            Publication date Pub: 28 March 2022
            Publication date Collection: 2022
            Volume: 37
            Issue: 4
            Pages: 353-370
            Affiliations
            [1 ]School of Engineering, The University of Western Australia
            [2 ]Centre for Engineering Innovation: Agriculture and Ecological Restoration, The University of Western Australia
            [3 ]School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia
            [4 ]Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia
            Author notes
            [* ] Correspondence: Wesley M. Moss ( wesley.moss@ 123456uwa.edu.au )

            Accepting editor: Kevin Scally

            Article
            DOI: 10.13169/prometheus.37.4.0353
            SO-VID: 8e779ffb-7019-4d27-994b-6cfef70432b3
            Copyright ©
            License:

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Pages: 18
            Categories
            Subject: Research papers

            ScienceOpen disciplines: Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics

            References

            1. ABARES (2020) ‘Agricultural commodities: December quarter 2020’, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra.

            2. AgFunder (2021) AgFunder AgriFoodTech Investment Report, available at https://agfunder.com/research/2021-AgFunder-agrifoodtech-investment-report/ (accessed December 2021 ).

            3. (1984) Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems, Gordon & Breach, London.

            4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016) Agricultural Commodities, Australia, 2015–16, ABS, Canberra.

            5. Australian Seeds Authority (2020) Certified Seed Produced under OECD, AOSCA and Australian Seed Certification Schemes in Australia in the 12 Months to 30 September 2019, Australian Seeds Authority, Lindfield NSW.

            6. , , and (2001) Improved Sub-clover Seed Production, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Wagga Wagga NSW.

            7. Bayer (2019) Annual Report, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany.

            8. and (2014) ‘The development of conservation agriculture in Australia – farmers as innovators’, International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2, 1, pp.21–34.

            9. and (1981) ‘Sources of innovation in agricultural technology’, World Development, 9, 4, pp.321–6.

            10. , and (2008) ‘Do patents encourage or hinder innovation? The case of the steam engine’, The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty, 58, 10, pp.14–17.

            11. (1995) ‘Horwood Bagshaw vacuum seeds harvesters’ in , Pasture Plus: The Complete Guide to Pastures, Kondinin Group, Belmont WA, pp.406–9.

            12. and (2015) Small-Scale Farmer Innovation, Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva.

            13. (1992) ’Exploring the limits of the technology S-curve. Part I: component technologies’, Production and Operations Management, 1, 4, pp.334–57.

            14. , and (2012) ‘Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation?’, European Economic Review, 56, 4, pp.727–46.

            15. (2017) ‘Sources of technological innovation: radical and incremental innovation problem-driven to support competitive advantage of firms’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29, 9, pp.1048–61.

            16. (1997) ‘Australian pasture production: the last 50 years’ in and (eds) Pasture Production and Management, Inkata Press, Melbourne, pp.1–16.

            17. , , and (2006) ‘Forecasting emerging technologies: use of bibliometrics and patent analysis’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 8, pp.981–1012.

            18. Dairy Australia (2021) Dairy Situation Report and Outlook 2021, September, Dairy Australia, available at https://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/resource-repository/2021/03/16/situation-and-outlook-report-march-2021#.YF7fiK8zaUk (accessed December 2021 ).

            19. and (2019) ‘An engineering review of the farm tractor’s evolution to a dominant design’, Journal of Mechanical Design, 141, 3, 031107.

            20. and (2013) Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill, New York.

            21. (2017) ‘Bringing farmers into the game. Strengthening farmers’ role in the innovation process through a simulation game, a case from Tunisia’, Agricultural Systems, 157, pp.129–39.

            22. and (1954) ‘Fertility and productivity of a podzolic soil as influenced by subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) and superphosphate’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, 4, pp.664–87.

            23. (2012) Analysis of Feedbase Audit, Final Report, Meat and Livestock Australia, March, North Sydney NSW, available at https://www.mla.com.au/contentassets/be0d5cf52e7949fc9b97f9ef3e9af4aa/b.pas.0297_final_report.pdf (accessed December 2021 ).

            24. FAO (2018) The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2018: Building Climate Resilience for Food Security and Nutrition, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, available at https://www.fao.org/policy-support/tools-and-publications/resources-details/en/c/1152267/ (accessed December 2021 ).

            25. (2008) Every Farm a Factory: The Industrial Ideal in American Agriculture, Yale University Press, New Haven CT.

            26. , , and (2019) ‘Building bridges between agribusiness innovation and smallholder farmers: a review’, Global Food Security, 20, pp.60–5.

            27. , , , , , and (2015) ‘Hotspots and gaps in the world collection of subterranean clover (trifolium subterraneum L.)’, Journal of Agricultural Science, 153, 6, pp.1069–83.

            28. , , , , , , , , and (2010) ‘Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people’, Science, 327, 5967, pp.812–18.

            29. , and (2012) ‘A historical review of the modulus concept and its relevance to mechanical engineering design today’, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 50, April, pp.1–14.

            30. Hassall & Associates (2001) A Study of the Costs of Production of Lucerne, Medic and Clover Seeds in Australia, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Barton ACT.

            31. (2020) ‘The right to repair, the right to tinker, and the right to innovate’, Annals of Business Administrative Science, 19, 4, pp.143–57.

            32. and (2018) Agricultural Research Investment and Policy Reform in High-Income Countries, Economic Research Report 249, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.

            33. (2007) Australian Agriculture: its History and Challenges, CSIRO, Melbourne.

            34. , and (2007) ‘Farmers and researchers: how can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development?’, Agriculture and Human Values, 24, 3, pp.355–68.

            35. , and (1995) Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

            36. , and (2015) ‘Measuring and understanding the drivers of agricultural innovation: evidence from Ireland’, Food Policy, 51, C, pp.1–8.

            37. , , and (2005) ‘A second generation of annual pasture legumes and their potential for inclusion in Mediterranean-type farming systems’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 45, 3, pp.289–99.

            38. (2013) ‘Farmer-driven innovation in New South Wales, Australia’, Australian Geographer, 44, 1, pp.81–95.

            39. and (2014) ‘Agriculture: engage farmers in research’, Nature News, 509, 7498, p.25.

            40. (2001) ‘An introduction to TRIZ: the theory of inventive problem solving’, Creativity and Innovation Management, 10, 2, pp.123–5.

            41. and (2016) ‘Why the developing world needs mechanical design’, Journal of Mechanical Design, 138, 7, 070301.

            42. and (2014) ‘Nine principles for design for the developing world as derived from the engineering literature’, Journal of Mechanical Design, 136, 12, 121403.

            43. MLA (2020) State of the Industry Report 2020, Meat and Livestock Australia, North Sydney NSW.

            44. , , , , and (2021a) ‘Vacuum harvesting sucks: improving the Horwood Bagshaw Clover Harvester’, paper delivered to Australian Grassland Association Symposium.

            45. , , , and (2021b) ‘Harvesting subterranean clover seed – current practices, technology and issues’, Crop and Pasture Science, 72, 3, pp.223–35.

            46. , , , , and (2022) ‘A century of subclover: lessons for sustainable intensification from a historical review of innovations in subterranean clover seed production’ in (ed.) Advances in Agronomy, 171, Academic Press, London, pp.305–39.

            47. , , , , , and (2013) ‘Genetic improvement of subterranean clover (trifolium subterraneum L.). 1. Germplasm, traits and future prospects’, Crop and Pasture Science, 64, pp.312–46.

            48. , , , , , , and (2012) ‘Temperate pasture legumes in Australia – their history, current use, and future prospects’, Crop and Pasture Science, 63, 9, pp.691–725.

            49. OECD (2013) Agricultural Innovation Systems: A Framework for Analysing the Role of the Government, OECD Publishing, Paris.

            50. , and (2013) ‘Identification of promising patents for technology transfers using TRIZ evolution trends’, Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 2, pp.736–43.

            51. (2020) ‘Translational research in agriculture. Can we do it better?’, Crop and Pasture Science, 71, 6, pp.517–28.

            52. (2016) ‘Spill your (trade) secrets: knowledge networks as innovation drivers’, Notre Dame Law Review, 92, 4, pp.1561–1610.

            53. and (2001) ‘Nitrogen dynamics of pastures: nitrogen fixation inputs, the impact of legumes on soil nitrogen fertility, and the contributions of fixed nitrogen to Australian farming systems’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 41, 3, pp.327–46.

            54. and (2014) ‘Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems’, Annals of Botany, 114, 8, pp.1571–96.

            55. , , , , , , , , and (2018) ‘Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification’, Nature Sustainability, 1, 8, pp.441–6.

            56. and (1983) ‘The annual legume pasture in cereal-ley farming systems of southern Australia: a review’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 9, 3, pp.229–67.

            57. (2004) ‘Taxing agriculture in a developing country: a possible approach’, Contributions to Economic Analysis, 268, pp.245–68.

            58. (1989) ‘The role of farmers in the creation of agricultural technology’ in , and (eds) Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research, Intermediate Technology Development Group, London, pp.3–9.

            59. and (1982) ‘Farmer-back-to-farmer: a model for generating acceptable agricultural technology’, Agricultural Administration, 11, 2, pp.127–37.

            60. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and (2020) ‘Making science more effective for agriculture’ in (ed.) Advances in Agronomy, 163, Academic Press, London, pp.153–77.

            61. (2017) ‘Estimating the link between farm productivity and innovation in the Netherlands’, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, OECD, Paris.

            62. and (2007) ‘Global food security under climate change’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 50, pp.19703–8.

            63. (2018) ‘Can you repair what you own?’, Mechanical Engineering, 140, 9, pp.37–41.

            64. and (2010) ‘Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: myth or reality?’, Management Science, 56, 1, pp.41–56.

            65. (2018) ‘Ag and bio ethics winner: fighting the right to repair: the perpetuity of a monopoly’, Resource Magazine. 25, 1, pp.18–19.

            66. , and (2006) ‘Protecting know-how and trade secrets in collaborative Rand D relationships’, Research Technology Management, 49, 4, pp.30–8.

            67. (2000) Natural Gain in the Grazing Lands of Southern Australia, UNSW Press, Sydney.

            68. (2011) ‘The greening of the arid boundary’, Quadrant, 55, 7–8, pp.94–103.

            69. , and (2009) ‘On-farm innovation in the Australian wool industry: a sensemaking perspective’, Experimental Agriculture, 45, 3, pp.295–312.

            70. and (2001) ‘The agricultural innovation process: research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector’ in and , Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, volume 1, part A, pp.207–61.

            71. and (1979) ‘Subterranean clover and other legumes’ in (ed.) Agriculture in Western Australia 1829–1979, University of Western Australia Press, Perth.

            72. USDA (2021) Farms and Land in Farm 2020 Summary, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, available at https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/5712m6524/tq57pj927/rx914h75j/fnlo0221.pdf (accessed December 2021 ).

            73. , and (2012) ‘Harrington Seed Destructor: a new nonchemical weed control tool for global grain crops’, Crop Science, 52, 3, pp.1343–7.

            74. , , , , , , and (2020) ‘Tillage based, site-specific weed control for conservation cropping systems’, Weed Technology, 34, 5, pp.704–10.

            Comments

            Comment on this article