This article investigates questions of ‘designing for value change’ via a ubiquitous, yet often taken-for-granted, technology – streetlights. Smart city trends are spurring a new generation of streetlights, with lampposts being fitted with sensors, cameras and a host of other technologies aimed at monitoring and data collection. This has raised concerns about privacy, surveillance and power relations, arguably creating a changing value landscape for streetlights. However, the article will argue that, while smart streetlights may seem to instantiate a moment of value change, they in fact represent a continuity of values fundamental to the very foundations of public lighting. They embody a set of values – and value tensions – that can be traced back to the origins of modern public lighting in the seventeeth–eighteenth centuries. Moreover, urban nights occupy a liminal space at the boundaries of social order, which likewise informs streetlights’ technical functions and symbolic meanings. Appreciating this continuity of values (and value tensions) is necessary for analysing the potential impacts of new innovations, as well as the value landscape that will inevitably shape their design and use. In adopting a historical perspective on a specific case study, as well as proposing the notion of value continuity, the article offers generalizable insights, as well as future research directions, for the theory and practice of designing for value change.
A. Alvarez (1996) Night, W. W. Norton, New York.
A. Beamish (2014) ‘Rendering the darkness visible: Boston at night’ in S. IsenstadtM. PettyD. Neumann (eds) Cities of Light: Two Centuries of Urban Illumination, Taylor & Francis, Milton Park, pp.10–19.
M. Beaumont (2015) Nightwalking: A Nocturnal History of London, Chaucer to Dickens, Verso, London.
L. Bettencourt (2014) ‘The uses of big data in cities’, Big Data, 2, 1, pp.12–22.
M. BoeninkO. Kudina (2020) ‘Values in responsible research and innovation: from entities to practices’, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7, 3, pp.450–70.
S. Browne (2015) Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness, Duke University Press, Durham NC.
J. Brox (2014) ‘Out of the dark: a brief history of artificial light in outdoor spaces’ in J. MeierU. HasenöhrlK. KrauseM. Pottharst (eds) Urban Lighting, Light Pollution and Society, Taylor & Francis, Milton Park, pp.13–29.
C. Dewdney (2004) Acquainted with the Night: Excursions through the World After Dark, HarperCollins, Toronto.
N. DunnT. Edensor (2021) Rethinking Darkness: Cultures, Histories, Practices, Routledge, New York.
C. Ebbensgaard (2020) ‘Standardized difference: challenging uniform lighting through standards and regulation’, Urban Studies, 57, 9, pp.1957–76.
T. Edensor (2017) From Light to Dark: Daylight, Illumination, and Gloom, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis MN.
T. EdensorN. Dunn (2021) ‘Introduction: venturing into the dark’ in N. DunnT. Edensor (eds) Rethinking Darkness: Cultures, Histories, Practices, Routledge, Milton Park, pp.1–24.
R. Ekirch (2005) At Day’s Close: Night in Times Past, W. W. Norton, New York.
N. Elcott (2021) ‘A brief history of artificial darkness and race’ in N. DunnT. Edensor (eds) Rethinking Darkness: Cultures, Histories, Practices, Routledge, Milton Park, pp. 61–76.
S. Fussell (2019) ‘Why Hong Kongers are toppling lampposts’, The Atlantic, 30 August, available at https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/08/why-hong-kong-protesters-are-cutting-down-lampposts/597145/ (accessed May 2021).
S. Holder (2018) ‘The shadowy side of LED streetlights’, Bloomberg CityLab, available at https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-08/led-streetlights-raise-new-opportunities-for-surveillance (accessed May 2021).
S. Isenstadt (2018) Electric Light: An Architectural History, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
S. IsenstadtM. PettyD. Neumann (eds) (2014) Cities of Light: Two Centuries of Urban Illumination, Taylor & Francis, New York.
R. Kitchin (2016) ‘The ethics of smart cities and urban science’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374, pp.1–15.
C. Koslofsky (2011) Evening’s Empire: A History of the Night in Early Modern Europe, University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge.
M. Melbin (1987) Night as Frontier: Colonizing the World After Dark, Free Press, New York.
D. Nye (1990) Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology, 1880–1940, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
B. Palmer (2000) Cultures of Darkness: Night Travels in the Histories of Transgression, Monthly Review Press, New York.
PLDC (2017) The Future of Urban Lighting: The Visions of Eight Masters of Lighting Design, Gütersloh, VIA-Verlag.
J. Sadowski (2020) ‘Who owns the future city? Phases of technological urbanism and shifts in sovereignty’, Urban Studies, 58, 8, pp.1732–44.
J. SadowskiR. Bendor (2019) ‘Selling smartness: corporate narratives and the smart city as a sociotechnical imaginary’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 44, 3, pp.540–63.
J. SadowskiF. Pasquale (2015) ‘The spectrum of control: a social theory of the smart city’, First Monday, 20, 7, pp.1–22.
W. Schivelbusch (1988) (tr. A. Davis) Disenchanted Night: The Industrialization of Light in the Nineteenth Century, University of California Press, Berkeley.
J. Schlör (1998) (tr. G. ImhofD. Roberts) Nights in the Big City: Paris, Berlin, London 1840–1930, Reaktion Books, London.
R. Sennett (2019) Building and Dwelling: Ethics for the City, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK.
R. Shaw (2018) The Nocturnal City, Routledge, New York.
T. Stone (2017) ‘Light pollution: a case study in framing an environmental problem’, Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20, 3, pp.279–93.
T. Stone (2021a) ‘Design for values and the city’, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 8, 3, pp.364–81.
T. Stone (2021b) ‘Re-envisioning the nocturnal sublime: on the ethics and aesthetics of night-time lighting’, Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy, 40, 2, pp.481–91.
T. Timan (2013) ‘Surveillance in urban nightscapes: a STS-informed perspective’, TECNOSCIENZA, Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 4, 2, pp.92–124.
P. Timmerman (2012) ‘My streets are my ideas of imagination: literature and the theme of the natural city’ in I. StefanovicS. Scharper (eds) The Natural City, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp.65–86.
S. Vallor (2016) Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
I. van de Poel (2020) ‘Three philosophical perspectives on the relation between technology and society, and how they affect the current debate about artificial intelligence’, Human Affairs, 30, pp.499–511.
I. van de Poel (2021) ‘Design for value change’, Ethics and Information Technology, 23, 4, pp.27–31.
B. Van der SlootM. Lanzing (2021) ‘The continued transformation of the public sphere: on the road to smart cities, living labs and a new understanding of society’ in M. Nagenborg et al. (eds) Technology and the City: Towards a Philosophy of Urban Technologies, Springer, Dordrecht, pp.319–46.
R. Williams (2008) ‘Night space: darkness, deterritorialization, and social control’, Space and Culture, 11, 4, pp.514–32.
L. Winner (1980) ‘Do artifacts have politics?’, Daedalus, 109, 1, pp.121–36.
Y. Yang (2020) ‘Why Hong Kong protesters fear the city’s “smart lamp posts”’, Financial Times, 8 January, available at https://www.ft.com/content/f0300b66-30dd-11ea-9703-eea0cae3f0de (accessed May 2021).