- Record: found
- Abstract: found
- Article: found
Imagining digital twins in healthcare: Designing for values as designing for technical milieus
Abstract
Medicine is increasingly focusing on the prevention of diseases. The digital twin (DT) is considered to be an important technological development for realizing this transition. Broadly speaking, a DT is an in silico representation of an individual that dynamically reflects molecular and physiological status, which makes it possible to monitor precisely health status over time. Currently, DTs are more of an abstract ideal than a concrete technological reality, which makes it possible to actively imagine the different ways in which DTs might materialize. This article develops an approach to imagining the different ways in which DTs can be integrated into the lives of people. It focuses on how potential users want to be cared for by means of DTs and how care practices might be changed through the introduction of DTs. The article shows that a shift towards preventive medicine is taking place and situates DT in this context. Then, drawing on the insights of Gilbert Simondon, it suggests that the notion of technical milieu can be a helpful tool for designers to imagine the practices of valuing to which DTs give rise. Subsequently, it explains how our philosophical approach helps inform what kinds of DTs can be imagined. Then, based on interviews with people likely to relate to DTs in the (near) future, it develops six conceptions of DTs and fleshes out some of the implications of our approach for the design of DTs.
Content
Author and article information
References
V. Beaubois (2019) ‘La zone obscure du design: une pensée des pratiques de conception (d’)après Gilbert Simondon’, unpublished thesis, University Paris Nanterre.
M. BoeninkO. Kudina (2020) ‘Values in responsible research and innovation: from entities to practices’, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7, 3, pp.450–70.
B. de Boer (2019) ‘Health monitoring applications and the transparency of health’, Delphi: Interdisciplinary Review of Emerging Technologies, 2, 3, pp.129–34.
B. de Boer (2020) ‘Experiencing objectified health: turning the body into an object of attention’, Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 23, 3, pp.401–11.
B. de BoerJ. HoekO. Kudina (2018) ‘Can the technological mediation approach improve technology assessment? A critical view from “within”’, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5, 3, pp.299–315.
M. Braun (2021) ‘Represent me: please! Towards an ethics of digital twins in medicine’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 47, 6, pp.394–400.
S. Brown (2016) ‘Principles for developing patient avatars in precision and systems medicine’, Frontiers in Genetics, 6, paper 365.
R. BrownJ. Kulik (1977) ‘Flashbulb memories’, Cognition, 5, 1, pp.73–99.
K. Bruynseelsde SantoniF. SioJ. van den Hoven (2018) ‘Digital twins in healthcare: ethical implications of an emerging engineering paradigm’, Frontiers in Genetics, 9, paper 31.
M. Combes (2013) Gilbert Simondon and the Philosophy of the Transindividual, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
A. CroattiM. GabelliniS. MontagnaA. Ricci (2020) ‘On the integrations of agents and digital twins in healthcare’, Journal of Medical Systems, 44, paper 161.
A. El Saddik (2018) ‘Digital twins: the convergence of multimedia technologies’, IEEE Multimedia, 25, 2, pp.87–92.
European Commission. (2018) ‘On enabling the digital transformation of health and care in the digital single market; empowering citizens and building a healthier society’, available at https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/communication-enabling-digital-transformation-health-and-care-digital-single-market-empowering (accessed July 2021).
A. Feenberg (2017) Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
M. FloresG. GlusmanK. BrogaardN. PriceL. Hood (2013) ‘P4 medicine: how systems medicine will transform the healthcare sector and society’, Personalized Medicine, 10, 6, pp.565–76.
C. GrovesK. HenwoodF. ShiraniC. ButlerK. ParkhillN. Pidgeon (2016) ‘The grit in the oyster: using energy biographies to question socio-technical imaginaries of “smartness”’, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 3, 1, pp.4–25.
A. Grunwald (2014) ‘The hermeneutic side of responsible research and innovation’, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1, 3, pp.274–91.
A. Grunwald (2020) ‘The objects of technology assessment: hermeneutic extension of consequentialist reasoning’, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7, 1, pp.96–112.
L. Hood (2013) ‘Systems biology and P4 medicine: past, present, and future’, Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal, 4, 2, e0012.
M. Lanzing (2019) ‘“Strongly recommended” revisiting decisional privacy to judge hypernudging in self-tracking technologies’, Philosophy & Technology, 32, pp.549–68.
A. Lapworth (2020) ‘Gilbert Simondon and the technical mentalities and transindividual effects of art-science’, Body & Society, 26, 1, pp.107–34.
S. Lindberg (2019). ‘Being with technique–technique as being-with: the technological communities of Gilbert Simondon’, Continental Philosophy Review 52, pp.299–310.
C. MayA. DeinJ. Ford (2020) ‘New insights into the formation and duration of flashbulb memories: evidence from medical diagnosis memories’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35, 5, pp.1154–65.
S. Mills (2016) Gilbert Simondon: Information, Technology and Media, Rowman & Littlefield, London.
T. MoerenhoutI. DevischG. Cornelis (2018) ‘E-Health beyond technology: analyzing the paradigm shift that lies beneath’, Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 21, 1, pp.31–41.
E. PopaM. van HiltenE. OosterkampM. Bogaard (2021) ‘The use of digital twins in healthcare: socio-ethical benefits and socio-ethical risks’, Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 17, paper 6, available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-021-00113-x (accessed March 2022).
M. RuckensteinN. Schüll (2017) ‘The datafication of health’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 46, pp.261–78.
K. Shilton (2015) ‘Anticipatory ethics for a future internet: analyzing values during the design of an internet infrastructure’, Science & Engineering Ethics, 21, 1, pp.1–18.
G. Simondon (2009) (tr. A. de Boever) ‘Technical mentality’, Parrhesia, 7, pp.17–27.
G. Simondon (2014) Imagination et Invention, 1965–1966, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
G. Simondon (2017) (tr. C. MalaspinaJ. Rogove) On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects, Univocal Press, Minneapolis MN.
J. SmithP. FlowersM. Larkin (2009) Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Theory, Method and Research, Sage, London.
J. SmithM. Osborn (2015) ‘Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain’, British Journal of Pain, 9, pp.41–2.
B. Stiegler (1998) (tr. R. BeardsworthG. Collins) Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus, Stanford University Press, Redwood City CA.
H. VogtB. HofmannL. Getz (2016) ‘The new holism: P4 systems medicine and the medicalization of health and life itself’, Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 19, pp.307–23.
D. Voss (2019) ‘Invention and capture: a critique of Simondon’, Culture, Theory and Critique, 60, 3–4, pp.279–99.
A. Van Wynsberghe (2013) ‘Designing robots for care: care centered value-sensitive design’, Science & Engineering Ethics, 19, pp.407–33.