+1 Recommend
1 collections

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Shades of gray: Understanding the ethics of society’s technology and innovation propensities using national culture

      Pluto Journals


            This study examines the effects of national culture on national innovation. This is important because underlying values, which relate to national culture and are the basis of ethical stances, are predicted to affect directly country-level innovation propensities, which then can affect national economic well-being. Combining analyses from two databases, the paper explores the relationships between cultural dimensions, which are manifestations of underlying personal values held across a societal group, and national innovation outcomes. The first database uses Hofstede’s national culture dimensions and the other is based on the global innovation index scores of 71 countries. Of the six cultural dimensions, only masculinity/femininity is not found to be significantly related to innovation outcomes. Power distance and uncertainty avoidance negatively relate to innovation outcomes for three and four years, respectively, of the five years tested. Individualism, long-term orientation and indulgence positively relate to innovation outcomes for all five years tested. A major implication is that these cultural variables are important for innovation progress. Findings also suggest that the ethical use of technology and its underlying innovation practices (based on the value systems underlying these cultural dimensions) could benefit from further exploration on the effects of culture. In particular, if a country wants to increase its innovative efforts, it may be well advised to stress individualistic, future-oriented and egalitarian tendencies.


            Author and article information

            Pluto Journals
            30 August 2022
            : 38
            : 2
            : 194-206
            Author notes

            ACCEPTING EDITOR: Uta Wehn


            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            Page count
            Pages: 13
            Research papers

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics


            1. (ed.) (2001) American Philosophy of Technology. The Empirical Turn, Indiana University Press, Bloomington IN.

            2. (2010) ‘Philosophy of technology after the empirical turn’, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 14, 1, pp.36–48.

            3. (2018) ‘The new product portfolio innovativeness-stock returns relationship: the role of large individual investors’ culture’, Journal of Marketing 82, 6, pp.49–70.

            4. (2018a) ‘Technology games: using Wittgenstein for understanding and evaluating technology’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, pp.1503–19.

            5. (2018b) ‘Technology and the good society: a polemical essay on social ontology, political principles, and responsibility for technology’, Technology in Society, 52, pp.4–9.

            6. (2014) ‘Innovation agendas: the ambiguity of value creation’, Prometheus 32, 1, pp.23–47.

            7. (2014) ‘The direct and indirect impact of culture on innovation’, Technovation, 34, pp.12–20.

            8. (1995) Alternative Modernity: The Technical Turn in Philosophy and Social Theory, University of California Press, Berkeley CA.

            9. (2010) Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

            10. (2018) ‘The new production of legitimacy: STI policy discourses beyond the contract metaphor’, Research Policy, 47, pp.14–22.

            11. (1999) ‘Risk and responsibility’, Modern Law Review 62, pp.1–10.

            12. (2014) ‘Use of information and communication technology to support employee-driven innovation in organizations: a knowledge management perspective’, Journal of Knowledge Management 18, 4, pp.633–50.

            13. (1995) Managing Cultural Differences: Strategies for Competitive Advantage, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham UK.

            14. (1984) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage, Newbury Park CA.

            15. (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, London.

            16. (2011) ‘Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context’, Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2, 1, paper 8.

            17. (eds) (2004) Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.

            18. (1990) Technology and the Lifeworld: from Garden to Earth, Indiana University Press, Bloomington IN.

            19. (2002) ‘Leveraging intellectual capital through product and process management of human capital’, Journal of Intellectual Capital 3, 4, pp.415–29.

            20. (2015) Innovation in China: The Tail of the Dragon, Business Expert Press, New York.

            21. (eds) (2000) The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology, JAI Press, Amsterdam.

            22. (2017) ‘The relevance of innovation for ethics, responsibility and sustainability’, Industry and Innovation 24, 5, pp.437–45.

            23. (2019) Zoning China: Online Video, Popular Culture, and the State, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

            24. (2014) Competitiveness of Chinese Firms, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

            25. (2016) ‘Twenty challenges for innovation studies’, Science and Public Policy 43, 3, pp.432–50.

            26. (2017) ‘Does national culture influence exploratory and exploitative innovation?’, International Journal of Technology Management 73, 4, pp.235–53.

            27. (2017) ‘Leadership and innovation: the moderator role of organization support for innovative behaviors’, Journal of Management and Organization 24, 1, pp.108–28.

            28. (2021) International Financial Reporting Standards Implementation: A Global Experience, Emerald, London.

            29. (ed.) (1995) New Directions in the Philosophy of Technology, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

            30. (2018) ‘Methods for practising ethics in research and innovation: a literature review, critical analysis and recommendations’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, pp.1437–81.

            31. (1950) ‘Technology and man’, Phi Kappa Phi Journal 30, 1, pp.3–15.

            32. (2007) ‘Managing invention and innovation’, Research Technology Management 50, 1, pp.35–54.

            33. (1972) ‘Will technology humanize us?’, NASSP Bulletin 56, 361, pp.87–97.

            34. (eds) (2018) The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation, Cornell University, Ithaca NY.

            35. (2013) ‘Developing a framework for responsible innovation’, Research Policy 42, 9, pp.1568–80.

            36. (2017) ‘Precaution in the governance of technology’ in (eds) Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation, and Technology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.647–69.

            37. (2012) ‘Does culture still matter? The effects of individualism on national innovation rates’, Journal of Business Venturing, 27, pp.234–47.

            38. (1996) ‘Innovations, externalities and the problem of economic progress’, Public Choice 89, 1/2, pp.113–30.


            Comment on this article