- Record: found
- Abstract: found
- Article: found
Fallacies of Foundational Principles: Rawls's Political Liberalism and Islamophobia
Abstract
The philosophy of John Rawls forms a critical cornerstone in modern liberalism, especially with its two concomitant and defining components: the existence of a society that will easily reach a consensus, as a collection of reasonable people, on political matters, as distinguished from religious and other similarly broad social constructs; and that reasonable peoples will organically privilege and prioritize the political over the religious when the two are in conflict with one another. These tenets also inform Rawls's ideas on justice and those who have agency in its definition. Yet, implicit within these tenets is an exclusion of religiously oriented peoples for whom faith systems supersede the political, particularly a political model of which they had no participatory role to develop. The exclusion of Muslims from this process and model facilitates the emergence of Islamophobia in a society that perceives itself as imbued with Rawlsian liberalism and without contradiction. This article explores Rawlsian liberalism and the central role it plays in modern, Western philosophy. It will offer a critique of his beliefs and delineate the internal flaws within Rawlsian liberalism. In addition, it will assess the fundamental architecture of Rawls's liberalism as a model lacking in practical applicability even from a normative reading. Finally, this article will demonstrate how such constructions of liberalism exclude Muslims from agency within a Rawlsian liberal society and contribute to the development and institutionalization of Islamophobia in such societies.
Content
Author and article information
References
An-Na'im, A. (2008) Islam and the Secular State . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Calhoun, C. (ed.) (1992) Habermas and the Public Sphere . Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fanon, F. (1967) Black Skin, White Masks . New York: Grove Press.
Fortier, J. (October 2010) Can liberalism lose the enlightenment? The Journal of Politics . 72 (4), 1003–13.
Fraser, N. (1990) Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text . 25/26, 56–80.
Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere . Cambridge: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2006) Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy . 14, 1–25.
Hatzenberger, A. (2013) Kazanistan: John Rawls's oriental Utopia. Utopian Studies . 24 (1): 105–18.
Hilb, C. (1994) Equality at the limit of liberty. In Laclau, E. (ed.) The Making of Political Identities . London: Verso Books.
Hofbauer, J. (2016) Sovereignty in the Exercise of the Right to Self-Determination . Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
March, A. (2009) Islam and Liberal Citizenship . New York: Oxford University Press.
Mills, C. (1997) The Racial Contract . Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Mouffe, C. (2009) The Democratic Paradox . London: Verso Books.
Nash, J. (1950) Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 36 (1): 48–49.
Nynas, P., Lassander, M., and Utrianen, T. (eds) (2012) Post-Secular Society . New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1995) Political Liberalism . New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of Peoples . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (2001) Justice as Fairness . Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Rorty, R. (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Taylor, C. (2010) The meaning of secularism. The Hedgehog Review . 12 (3), 23–34.
Turner, B. (2013) The Religious and the Political . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voltaire (1991) Candide . Mineola: Dover Publications.
Voltaire (2011) Mahomet . Radford: Wilder Publications.