418
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      State Crime Journal is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “To Taste Something New, First Empty Your Cup”: Bartleby Politics, Anti-Colonial Resistance and State Violence

      Published
      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This paper brings together Žižek's Bartleby politics with the praxis of organic intellectuals emerging out of the “Bougainville crisis”, in order to generate a new vantage point for theorizing anti-colonial resistance to state violence. Bartleby politics, it is argued, conceptualizes how socio-symbolic orders naturalize their existence, and the strategies required to disrupt this completeness of power, so we can begin again. Applying this approach, it is argued during colonization metropolitan powers shatter the permanency of indigenous socio-symbolic orders, by situating them within a wider (contrived) teleological historical sequence. However, the metropolitan power's capacity to manage this risky enterprise—where the possibility of possibility emerges—is shaped by anti-colonial resistance. This resistance can shift a teleological moment to a contingent moment, where multiple vectors of history are opened up by the colonized “subjects,” that go beyond the set sequence offered by the colonial power. One of the most radical forms of violence colonized “subjects” can inflict on the colonial powers during this open historical moment, it is argued, is refusal. Refusal, that is to negotiate the terms and conditions of incorporation into Empire, and instead unilaterally setting a different historical course. The violence refusal inflicts on Empire, and the greater violence Empire inflicts back, will be examined through the case study of the Bougainville war.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.2307/j50005552
            statecrime
            State Crime Journal
            Pluto Journals
            2046-6056
            2046-6064
            1 January 2021
            : 10
            : 2 ( doiID: 10.13169/statecrime.10.issue-2 )
            : 217-237
            Affiliations
            [1 ] Independent researcher;
            [2 ] University of Ulster;
            Article
            statecrime.10.2.0217
            10.13169/statecrime.10.2.0217
            93bc6af7-e919-40ae-94a0-5a8f54f27942
            © 2021 International State Crime Initiative

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Categories
            Custom metadata
            eng

            Criminology
            Bartleby politics,colonial crimes,state crime,resistance,Žižek,Bougainville conflict

            References

            1. Applied Geology Associates Limited (1989) Environmental, Socio-Economic and Public Health Review of Bougainville Copper Mine Panguna. Wellington: Author.

            2. Attell, K. (2013) “Language and Labor, Silence and Stasis”, in J. Frank, ed., A Political Companion to Herman Melville. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.

            3. Australian High Commission Official (2006) Personal communication, 6 September.

            4. Barnes, C. (1969) “Speech by the Minister for External Territories”, Melbourne Chamber of Commerce Seminar, 12 June. Available online at: https://www.colonialsyndrome.org/files/series-1/barnes-1969.pdf (accessed 31 August 2021).

            5. Bougainville Copper Limited (1988a) Meeting minutes, 28 April.

            6. Bougainville Copper Limited (1988b) Meeting minutes, 31 July.

            7. Bourdieu, P. (2020) Habitus and Field: General Sociology, vol. 2. Lectures at the College de France, 1982-83. Cambridge: Polity Press.

            8. Brown, W. (2004) ‘“The Most we can Hope for . . .‘: Human Rights and the Politics of Fatalism”, South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2-3): 451-63.

            9. Critchley, S. (2010) “Violent Thoughts about Slavoj Žižek”, [Web blog post]. Available online at: http://www.nakedpunch.com/articles/39 (accessed 31 August 2021).

            10. de Sutter, L. (2015) Žižek and Law. New York: Routledge.

            11. Dean, J. (2004) “Žižek on Law”, Law and Critique, Vol. 15: 1-24.

            12. Defence Intelligence Branch (1990) An Intelligence Resume for Contingency Planning for North Solomons Province. Port Moresby: Author.

            13. Dorney, S. (1998) The Sandline Affair. Sydney: ABC Books.

            14. Griffin, J. (1990) “Bougainville is a Special Case”, in R.J. May and M. Spriggs, eds., The Bougainville Crisis. Bathurst: Crawford House Press.

            15. Hannett, L. (1966) “Now is the Moment of Truth”, Dialogue, 1(2): 1-5.

            16. Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

            17. Hay, D. (1967) “Memo from David Hay, Administrator, Territory of Papua and New Guinea, to George Warwick-Smith Esq., Secretary, Department of Territories, Canberra”, 25 January. Available online at: https://www.colonialsyndrome.org/files/series-1/barnes-1969.pdf (accessed 31 August 2021).

            18. Idioai, B. (2014) Personal communication, 27 November.

            19. Iruinu, B. (2015) Personal communication, 5 August.

            20. Johnston, A. (2009) Badiou, Žižek and Political Transformations. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

            21. Jubilee Australia (2014) Voices of Bougainville: Nikana Kangsi, Nikana Dong Damana, [Report]. Available online at: https://www.colonialsyndrome.org/files/series-6/6-092014-jubilee-australia-voices-of-bougainville.pdf (accessed 31 August 2021).

            22. Lasslett, K. (2014) State Crime on the Margins of Empire: Rio Tinto, the War on Bougainville and Resistance to Mining. London: Pluto Books.

            23. Marx, K. (1976) Capital, vol. 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.

            24. Matevai, J. (2014) Personal communication, 23 November.

            25. Newman, S. (2004) “The Place of Power in Politics”, International Political Science Review, Vol. 25: 139-57

            26. Ogan, E. (1999) The Bougainville Conflict: Perspectives from Nasioi. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies (Australian National University), Discussion Paper 99/3.

            27. Okole, H. (1990) “The Politics of the Panguna Landowners' Association”, in R.J. May and M. Spriggs, eds, The Bougainville Crisis. Bathurst: Crawford House Press.

            28. Ona, F. (1989) BRA communiqué, 29 November.

            29. Polanyi, K. (2001) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.

            30. Regan, A.J. (2003) “The Bougainville Conflict: Political and Economic Agendas”, in K. Ballentine. and J. Sherman, eds., The Political Economy of Armed Conflict: Beyond Greed and Grievance. London: Lynne Rienner Publishing.

            31. Sharpe, M. and Boucher, G. (2010) Žižek and Politics: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

            32. Totobu, M. (2015) Personal communication, 7 August.

            33. Vighi, F. (2010) On Žižek's Dialectics: Surplus, Subtraction, Sublimation. London: Continuum. Vighi, F. (2015) “The Ambiguous Remainder. Contemporary Capitalism and the Becoming Law of the Symptom”, in L. de Sutter, ed., Žižek and Law. New York: Routledge.

            34. Žižek, S. (1991) For they Know Not What they Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. London: Verso.

            35. Žižek, S. (1993) Tarrying with the Negative. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

            36. Žižek, S. (1999) The Ticklish Subject. London: Verso.

            37. Žižek, S. (2005) Interrogating the Real. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

            38. Žižek, S. (2006) “Notes towards a Politics of Bartleby”, Comparative American Studies, 4(4): 375-94.

            39. Žižek, S. (2008a) Violence: Six Sideways Reflections. New York: Picador.

            40. Žižek, S. (2008b) In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso.

            41. Žižek, S. (2009) The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

            42. Žižek, S. (2012) Less than Nothing. Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso.

            43. Žižek, S. (2014a) The Most Sublime Hysteric: Hegel with Lacan. Cambridge: Polity Press.

            44. Žižek, S. (2014b) Absolute Recoil: Towards a New Foundational of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso.

            45. Žižek, S. (2015) “The Rule of Law between Obscenity and the Right to Distress”, in L. de Sutter, ed., Žižek and Law. New York: Routledge.

            Comments

            Comment on this article