State–corporate crime research has been critiqued for fetishizing events and specific institutional arrangements. In recent years, this tendency has been changing as researchers are increasingly transcending the empiricist orthodoxy by giving more attention to relations and processes behind events and institutional arrangements. This is evidenced in the UK by the work of Steve Tombs, David Whyte and Kristian Lasslett. Their complementary concepts of “state–corporate crime symbiosis” and “regimes of permission” direct the analysis of social harm at systemic relations and processes expressed through state and corporate practices constitutive of capitalism. Following from this, Kristian Lasslett's application of Marxist dialectic to the study of state crime provides a scientific vantage point for the analysis advocated by Tombs and Whyte. Drawing lessons from their works, the article attempts a Marxist dialectical analysis of the Bt cotton and its contribution to the agrarian crisis in India.
Kaviresh Gowda ( 2016), Group Interview, Kadagamdoddi, Raichur, Karnataka, 30 August, 2016.
Thaayappa, G. ( 2016), Group Interview, Jaalibenchi, Raichur, Karnataka, 31 August, 2016.
Huligappa Gowda ( 2016), Group Interview, Gonal Raichur, Karnataka, 30 August, 2016.
Shrakanth Gowda ( 2016), Group Interview, Kadagamdoddi, Raichur, Karnataka, 30 August, 2016.
Huligappa Gowda ( 2016), Group Interview, Gonal Raichur, Karnataka, 30 August, 2016.
Sadhakar Gowda ( 2016), Group Interview, Gonal Raichur, Karnataka, 30 August, 2016.
Hanumanthappa ( 2016), Group Interview, Jalibenchi Raichur, Karnataka, 30 August, 2016.
Hanumanthappa ( 2016), Group Interview, Jalibenchi Raichur, Karnataka, 30 August, 2016.