3,249
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    1
    shares

      Call for Papers: Hierarchies of domesticity – spatial and social boundaries. Deadline for submissions is 30th September, 2024Full details can be read here.

      Articles to be no longer than 6,000 words (excluding footnotes and bibliography) and submitted in two forms: an anonymised version in which all references to the authors’ institution and publications are omitted; and a full version including the authors’ titles and institutional affiliations. For complete instructions on style, formatting, etc., please consult: https://www.plutojournals.com/wp-content/uploads/WOLG-Instructions-for-Authors2023.pdf 

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The platform economy and the precarisation of food delivery work in the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from India

      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This study aims to explore work precarity in the platform economy from the perspective of food delivery workers. It also tries to contextualise work precarity in COVID-19 times. With the digital boom, food-based platform aggregators have emerged as a new workspace for food delivery workers in India. Food delivery workers working for platform aggregators are termed ‘independent contractors’ and ‘delivery partners’ to avoid legal issues of employer-employee relations; this enables a substantial reduction in transaction costs. Despite the huge number of food delivery workers, they are unable to organise into collectives. The platform economy is emerging as a sector offering new work opportunities, but at the same time it is plagued by low wages (and benefit), absence (or lack) of welfare measures, and digital controls contributing to the process of precarisation. The COVID-19 pandemic and resultant lockdown have aggravated the precarity of work for food delivery workers. It has led to the loss of jobs and incomes, and increased health risks, stigmas and occupation distress. Further, autonomy and flexibility should not come at the cost of the most basic social security and protection. This precarious situation calls for affirmative action from policymakers and platform aggregators.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.2307/j50010512
            workorgalaboglob
            Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation
            Pluto Journals
            1745-641X
            1745-6428
            1 January 2021
            : 15
            : 1 ( doiID: 10.13169/workorgalaboglob.15.issue-1 )
            : 11-30
            Article
            workorgalaboglob.15.1.0011
            10.13169/workorgalaboglob.15.1.0011
            6e40506b-6e82-4113-b272-03a8cdf1f145
            © Sazzad Parwez and Rajiv Ranjan, 2021

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Custom metadata
            eng

            Sociology,Labor law,Political science,Labor & Demographic economics,Political economics
            platform economy,India,Covid19,food delivery workers,platform aggregators,Precarisation

            References

            1. Agrawal, A., J. Horton, N. Lacetera & E. Lyons (2015). ‘Digitization and the contract labour market - a research agenda’, in A. Goldfarb, S. Greenstein & C. Tucker (eds), Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy, 219-250. Accessed from www.nber.org/chapters/c12988

            2. Alamyar, F.M. (2017). ‘Future of work: Formal rights, collective action, and experiences of work within the platform economy’. Accessed from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Future-of-Work%3A-Formal-rights%2C-collective-action-of-Alamyar/d3efe754ab66b3500ca0da55aeafd3dd8f2c1afb

            3. Aloisi, A. (2016). ‘Commoditized workers: Case study research on labour law issues arising from a set of ondemand/gig economy platforms’, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3):653-691.

            4. Aneja, U. & A. Shridhar (2019). Worker Wellbeing on Digital Work Platforms in India, Goa: Tandem Research. Accessed from https://tandemresearch.org/assets/Worker-Wellbeing-Tandem-Research-2019.pdf

            5. Arntz, M., T. Gregory & U.Z. Mannheim (2016). The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 189, Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en

            6. Aust, A. & H. Holst (2006). ‘From ignorance to organizing? Trade union strategies towards atypical workers in the example of call centres and temporary agency work’, Industrial Beziehungen, 13, 291-313.

            7. Benanav, A. (2019). Automation and the Future of Work, New Left Review, 5:19.

            8. Berg, J., M. Furrer, E. Harmon & U.R. Michael (2018). Six Silberman. Digital platforms and the future of work: Towards decent work in the online work, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

            9. Bohle, D. & B. Geskovits (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe's periphery, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

            10. Boston Consulting Group (2020). India's online food delivery industry to touch $8-bn mark by 2022: Report, Business Standard. Accessed from https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/india-s-online-food-delivery-industry-to-touch-8-bn-mark-by-2022-report-120012800822_1.html

            11. Business Today (2019a). ‘Swiggy plans to hire 3 lakh people in 18 months; aims to become third-largest employer in country’, 19 October 2019.

            12. Business Today (2019b). ‘Zomato delivery boys go on strike in Mumbai, Bengaluru after food app cuts incentives’, 18 September 2019.

            13. Cant, C. (2019). Riding for Deliveroo: Resistance in the New Economy, London: Wiley, 1-180.

            14. Cherry, M.A. & A. Antonio (2017). Dependent contractors' in the gig economy: A comparative approach, American University Law Review, 635.

            15. Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm, economica, New Series, 4 (16):386-405. Accessed from www.jstor.org/stable/2626876?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

            16. Codagnone, C. & B. Martens (2016). ‘Scoping the sharing economy: Origins, definitions, impact and regulatory issues,‘ SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-36. Accessed from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2783662

            17. De Groen, W.P. and I. Maselli (2016). The impact of the collaborative economy on the labour market. CEPS Special Report No. 138, Brussels: CEPS.

            18. De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the ‘gig-economy’, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(2):471-504.

            19. Donovan, S.A., D.H. Bradley & J.O. Shimabukuro (2016). What does the gig economy mean for workers? (CRS Report R44365). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Accessed from www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44365.pdf

            20. Dörre, K. (2005). ‘Zone of Vulnerability: Insecure employment relations, precarization and trade unions’, in M. Sommer, K. Dörre & U. Schneidewind, The future was the day before yesterday: Transformation of employment relations: Insecurity instead of standard employment relations? Oldenburg: Bibliotheks und Informationssystem der Universität, 19-55.

            21. Drahokoupil, J. & A. Piasna (2019). Digital labour in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from the etui internet and platform work Survey. ETUI Working Paper. Brussels: ETUI.

            22. Fidler, D. (2016). Work, interrupted the new labour economics of platforms. IFTF Research Report, Palo Alto: Institute for the Future. Accessed from https://workablefutures.org/publications/reports/work-interruptedthe-new-labor-economics-of-platforms/

            23. Gandini A. (2019). ‘Labour process theory and the gig economy’, Human Relations, 72:1039-1056.

            24. Goods, C., A. Veen, & T. Barratt (2017). ‘Being exploited and breaching your visa: the limited choices of the food delivery worker’, The Conversation. Accessed from https://theconversation.com/being-exploitedand-breaching-your-visa-the-limited-choices-of-the-food-delivery-worker-82589

            25. Gyulavári, T. (2020). ‘Collective rights of platform workers: the role of EU law’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 27(4), 406-424.

            26. Heeks, R. (2017). Decent work and the digital gig economy: A developing country perspective on employment impacts and standards in online outsourcing, crowdwork, etc. Development Informatics Working Paper Series No. 71, Manchester: Centre for Development Informatics Global Development Institute, SEED.

            27. Huws, U. (2014). Labor in the global digital economy: The cybertariat comes of age, New York: NYU Press, 1-240. Accessed from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1287j8b

            28. Huws, U., N.H. Spencer, D.S. Syrdal & K. Holts (2018). ‘Working in the gig economy: insights from Europe’, in Work in the digital age, Rowman & Littlefield International, 153-162

            29. Huws, U., N.H. Spencer, D.S. Syrdal & K. Holts (2017). Work in the European gig economy: research results from the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Italy, Brussels: Foundation of European Progressive Studies and UNI Europa.

            30. Indian Express (2020). ‘Covid Impact: Over 4,400 jobs cut by 5 major Indian companies in 1 month’, 27 May 2020. Accessed from https://indianexpress.com/article/business/companies/covid-19-impact-over-4-4k-jobs-cut-by-5-major-indian-cos-in-1-month-uber-lays-off-nearly-600-people-6428756/

            31. International Labour Organization (2016). Non-standard employment around the world: Understanding challenges, shaping prospects, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

            32. International Labour Organization (2018). The architecture of digital labour platforms: Policy recommendations on platform design for worker well-being, ILO future of work research paper series, Geneva: International Labour Organization, 6-55. Accessed from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—cabinet/documents/publication/wcms_630603.pdf

            33. Johnston, H. & C. Land-Kazlauskas (2018). ‘Organizing on-demand: Representation, voice, and collective bargaining in the gig economy’, Conditions of Work and Employment Series, 94.

            34. Kalleberg, A.L. (2018). Precarious lives: Job insecurity and well-being in rich democracies, Cambridge: Polity Press.

            35. Keane, M.P. & R. Thakur (2018). Health Care Spending and Hidden Poverty in India, UNSW Business School Research Paper No. 2018-02. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3118615

            36. Kenney, M. & J. Zysman (2016). The rise of the platform economy, Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61-69.

            37. Keune, M. & M. Pedaci (2019). Trade union strategies against precarious work: common trends and sectoral divergence in the EU. European Journal Industrial Relations, 26 (2):139-155.

            38. Lalvani, S. & B. Seetharaman (2020). ‘The Personal and social risks that India's food delivery workers are taking during COVID-19‘, Wire, 12 April 2020. Accessed from https://thewire.in/business/covid-19-food-delivery-workers.

            39. Leighton, P. & M. Wynn (2011). ‘Classifying employment relationships: more sliding doors or a better regulatory framework?‘, Industrial Law Journal, 40, 5-44.

            40. Mackenzie, E. & A. McKinlay (2020). Hope labour and the psychic life of cultural work. Human Relations.

            41. NASSCOM (2018). Catalyzing the ecosystem for a trillion-dollar digital economy, Hyderabad: National Association of Software and Services Companies. Accessed from https://www.nasscom.in/sites/default/files/NASSCOM-annualguidance-fy-2018.pdf

            42. National Sample Survey Office (2012). Informal sector and conditions of employment in India, New Delhi: NSS 66th Round, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.

            43. Palier, B. & K. Thelen (2010). ‘Institutionalizing dualism: complementarities and change in France and Germany’, Political Sociology, 38, 119-148.

            44. Pant, B. & U. Shende (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on the sharing economy in India, New Delhi: Policy Monks.

            45. Parwez, S. (2020). ‘A review of Special Economic Zone led to detrimental implications: An Indian experience’, Emerging Economy Studies, 6 (2):223-239

            46. Parwez, S. (2015). ‘Modified labour welfare measure for Special Economic Zone and Implications’, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(3), 386-396.

            47. Parwez, S. (2016a). ‘Labour and labour welfare in special economic zones in India with special reference to Gujarat’, South Asian Survey, 23 (2):1-23.

            48. Parwez, S. (2016b). ‘A Comparative Study of Gujarat and Kerala Developmental Experiences’, International Journal of Rural Management, 12 (2):104-124.

            49. Romei, V. (2015). ‘The new world of work: A changing landscape’, Financial Times, 4 August 2015.

            50. Rubery, J., Grimshaw D., Keizer A., Rubery, J., Grimshaw, D., Keizer, A. & Johnson, M. 2018). ‘Challenges and contradictions in the “normalising” of precarious work’, Work, Employment and Society, 32(3), 509-527.

            51. Salve, P. & S. Paliath (2019). ‘India's gig workers: Overworked and underpaid’, Indiaspend. Accessed from https://www.indiaspend.com/indias-gig-workers-overworked-and-underpaid/Schwander, H. (2018). ‘Labour market dualization and insider-outsider divides: why this new conflict matters’, Political Studies Review, 17, 14-29.

            52. Sowmiya, A. (2020). ‘As jobs vanish, salaried workers become gig economy’ partners' with Swiggy, Zomato and Amazon', Huffpost, 29 May 2020.

            53. Srnicek N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

            54. Stewart, A. & J. Stanford (2017). ‘Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options?‘, The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28 (3):420-437.

            55. Stewart, P., G. Shanahan & M. Smith (2020). Individualism and collectivism at work in an era of deindustrialisation: work narratives of food delivery couriers in the platform economy, Frontiers in Sociology, 5:49.

            56. Sundararajan, A. (2016). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism, Cambridge: MIT Press.

            57. The News Minute (2020). ‘App-based drivers, delivery executives protest for adequate safety gear, better income’, 9 June 2020.

            58. Tiwari, S., S.G. Ram & S. Roy (2019). ‘What Is It Like to Work in a Gig Economy Job’, Times of India. Available from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/what-it-is-like-to-work-in-a-gig-economy-job/articleshow/69371217.cms

            59. Veen, A., T. Barratt & C. Goods (2020). ‘Platform-capital's “appetite” for control: A labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia’, Work, Employment and Society, 34 (3):388-406.

            60. Will-Zocholl, M (2017). Virtual temptations: reorganising work under conditions of digitisation, virtualisation and informatisation, in K. Briken, S. Chillas, M. Krzywdzinski & A. Marks (eds), The new digital workplace: How new technologies revolutionise work, London: Palgrave MacMillan, 62-86.

            61. Woodcock, J. & M. Graham (2020). The gig economy, a critical introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press.

            Comments

            Comment on this article