377
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals, and the authors don’t pay an author processing charge (APC’s).

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Do trade certifications alleviate economic and social deprivations of plantation workers? A study of the tea plantation sector in India

      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This paper explores the important question whether trade certifications alleviate the economic and social deprivations of workers in tea plantations in India. Following a critical assessment of the historic deprivations faced by tea plantation workers, the author reviews the potential implications of various certifications adopted by tea plantations in India, including, Fairtrade (FT), RFA, ETP and Trustea. As a case for empirical analysis, the paper specifically examines FT certification and its impacts on tea plantation workers with particular reference to three certified tea estates located in the Nilgiris region in Tamilnadu (South India) and Assam (North-East India). The analysis endorses many of the findings of earlier studies on Fairtrade certification. Yet, it also provides very useful additional insights in terms of explaining why the adoption of certifications, especially FT certification, by tea plantations does not yield the intended outcomes with respect to amelioration of the deprivations suffered by the plantation workers. It reveals that, despite more than two decades of engagement with FT certifications, tea plantations are unable to make significant improvements in the lot of the plantation workers due mainly to the fact that the FT premiums that the tea estates receive are nominal and quite variable across years. It concludes that, given that the domestic consumption demand for tea has been growing in India, it is also crucial to focus on the domestic market through the design and promotion of appropriate certification standards (integrating the finest elements of existing ones) that would contribute towards improving the status as well as working and living conditions of plantation workers. This would also help mitigate the huge disparity in wages and earnings of workers between the south and north Indian states that emerge from the study.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.2307/j50010512
            workorgalaboglob
            Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation
            Pluto Journals
            1745-641X
            1745-6428
            1 January 2021
            : 15
            : 2 ( doiID: 10.13169/workorgalaboglob.15.issue-2 )
            : 46-72
            Article
            workorgalaboglob.15.2.0046
            10.13169/workorgalaboglob.15.2.0046
            3ba3d775-fe21-4f9f-b390-c8fd47bad808
            © P.K. Viswanathan, 2021

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            Custom metadata
            eng

            Sociology,Labor law,Political science,Labor & Demographic economics,Political economics
            certifications,Fairtrade,trade,reforms,Plantation Labour Act 1951,socio-economic deprivation,India,plantation workers

            References

            1. Baskar, M.V. & P.K. Viswanathan (2019) ‘Emerging vulnerabilities in India's plantation economy’ in K.R. Syam Sundar (eds), Globalization, Labour Market Institutions, Processes and Policies in India: Essays in Honour of Lalit K. Deshpande, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan:167–186. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-981-13-7111-0_6

            2. Bennett, E. (2020) ‘The global fair trade movement: For whom, by whom, how, and what next’ in K. Legun, J. Keller, M. Carolan & M. Bell (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:459–477. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108554558.029

            3. Besky, S. (2008) ‘Can a plantation be fair? Paradoxes and possibilities in fair trade Darjeeling tea certification’, Anthropology of Work Review, 29 (1):1–9.

            4. Besky, S. (2013) The Darjeeling Distinction: Labor and Justice on Fair-Trade Tea Plantations in India, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

            5. Besky, S. (2015) ‘Agricultural justice, abnormal justice? An analysis of fair trade's plantation problem’, Antipode, 47:1141–1160.

            6. Bhowmik, S.K. (2011) ‘Ethnicity and isolation: Marginalization of tea plantation workers’, Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts, 4 (2):235–253.

            7. Bhowmik, S.K. (2015) ‘Living conditions of tea plantation workers’, Economic and Political Weekly, 50 (46 & 47):29–32.

            8. Das, D.K., H. Choudhury & J. Singh (2015) ‘Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970 and labour market flexibility: An exploratory assessment of contract labour use in India's formal manufacturing’, ICRIER Working Paper No. 300. New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER).

            9. De Jonge, A. (2004) ‘Global economic forces and individual labour rights: An uneasy coexistence’, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 4:107–118.

            10. Fontana, M., S. Joekes & R. Masika (1998) Global Trade Expansion and Liberalisation: Gender Issues and Impacts. Report No. 42, Brighton: BRIDGE (development-gender) Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.

            11. Herman, A. (2019) ‘Assembling Fairtrade: Practices of progress and conventionalization in the Chilean wine industry’, EPA: Economy and Space, 51 (1):51–68.

            12. ILO (1996) World Employment 1996–97: National Policies in a Global Context, Geneva: International Labour Organization.

            13. ILO (2014) World Employment Report 2004–05: Employment, Productivity and Poverty Reduction, Geneva: International Labour Office.

            14. Joseph, K.J. & P.K. Viswanathan (2016) Globalisation, Inclusive Development and Plantation Labour: An Introduction, New York: Routledge India.

            15. Krumbiegel, K., M. Maertens & M. Wollni (2018) ‘The role of Fairtrade certification for wages and job satisfaction of wageworkers’, World Development, 102:195–212.

            16. Lalitha, N., V. Nelson, A. Martin et al. (2013) Assessing the Poverty Impact of Sustainability Standards: Indian Tea, London: University of Greenwich.

            17. Makita, R. (2012) ‘Fair trade certification: The case of tea wageworkers in India’, Development Policy Review, 30 (1):87–107.

            18. Makita, R. (2015) ‘Fair trade and wageworkers in Asia’ in L. Raynolds and E. Bennett (eds), Handbook of Research on Fair Trade, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing:491–508.

            19. Moore, L.B. (2010). ‘Reading tea leaves: The impact of mainstreaming fair trade’, Working Paper Series, 10-106. London: London School of Economics.

            20. Nelson, V. & B. Pound (2009) The Last Ten Years: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature on the Impact of Fairtrade, London: Fairtrade Foundation by the Natural Resources Institute (NRI) of the University of Greenwich.

            21. OECD (1994) OECD Jobs Study, Paris: OECD.

            22. Orbie, J., D. Martens, M. Oehri & L. Van den Putte (2016) ‘Promoting sustainable development or legitimising free trade? Civil society mechanisms in EU trade agreements’, Third World Thematics: A Third World Quarterly Journal, 1 (4):526–546.

            23. Ostertag, C.F. et al. (2014) An Evaluation of Fairtrade Impact on Smallholders and Workers in the Banana Sector in Northern Colombia. Bogota: Corporation for Rural Business Development (CODER).

            24. Patnaik, P. (2014) ‘Neoliberalism and Democracy’, Economic & Political Weekly, 49 (15):39–44.

            25. Pieters, J. (2015) ‘Trade liberalization and gender inequality: Can free-trade policies help to reduce gender inequalities in employment and wages?‘, IZA World of Labour 2014, 114 (January). https://wol.iza.org/uploads/articles/114/pdfs/trade-liberalization-and-gender-inequality.pdf

            26. Raynolds, L. (2014) ‘Fairtrade, certification, and labor: Global and local tensions in improving conditions for agricultural workers’, Agriculture and Human Values, 31:499–511.

            27. Raynolds, L.T. (2017) ‘Fairtrade labour certification: The contested incorporation of plantations and workers’, Third World Quarterly, 38 (7):1473–1492.

            28. Raynolds, L.T. & E.A. Bennett (eds) (2015) The Handbook of Research on Fair Trade, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

            29. Raynolds, L.T. & Rosty, C. (2021) ‘Fair Trade USA coffee plantation certification: Ramifications for workers in Nicaragua’, Development Policy Review, 39:O102–O121.

            30. Reddy, D.N. (2019) ‘Labour rights in globalizing world and India’ in K.R.S. Sundar (ed.), Globalization, Labour Market Institutions, Processes and Policies in India: Essays in Honour of Lalit K. Deshpande, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan Imprint: chapter 15.

            31. Reed, D. (2009) ‘What do corporations have to do with Fair Trade? Positive and normative analysis from a value chain perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics, 86 (1):3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9757-5

            32. Riisgaard, L. (2015) ‘Fairtrade certification, conventions and labor’ in L. Raynolds & E. Bennett (eds), Handbook of Research on Fair Trade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing:120–138.

            33. Sarkar, K. (2016) ‘Wages, mobility and labour market institutions in tea plantations: The case of West Bengal and Assam’ in K.J. Joseph & P. K. Viswanathan (eds) Globalisation, Development, Plantation Labour in India, New York: Routledge India:27–50.

            34. Sen, D. (2009) ‘From illegal to organic: Fair Trade-organic tea production and women's political futures in Darjeeling, India’, dissertation submitted to the Graduate School – New Brunswick Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, October.

            35. Sen, D. (2017) Everyday Sustainability: Gender Justice and Fairtrade Tea in Darjeeling. SUNY Series, Praxis: Theory in Action. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

            36. Siegmann, K.A., A. Sajitha, F. Karin, K.J. Joseph, K. Romeshun, K. Rachel & P.K. Viswanathan (2019) ‘Testing Fairtrade's labour rights commitments in South Asian tea plantations: A good match of civic and industrial conventions?‘, Revue internationale des études du développement, 240 (4):63–944.

            37. Staricco, J.I. (2019) ‘Class dynamics and ideological construction in the struggle over fairness: A Neo-Gramscian examination of the fairtrade initiative’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 46 (1):96–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1337003

            38. Sundar, S.K.R. (2018a). ‘Labour law reforms and the reform strategy of the central government at the national level in the post-reform period: An overview’ in K.R.S. Sundar (ed.), Contemporary Reforms of Labour Market and Industrial Relations System in India: Ease of Doing Business versus Labour Rights, New Delhi: Academic Foundation:83–126.

            39. Sundar, S.K.R. (2018b) ‘Labour laws and governance reforms in Indian States: Informalising formality!‘ in K.R.S. Sundar (ed.), Contemporary Reforms of Labour Market and Industrial Relations System in India: Ease of Doing Business versus Labour Rights. New Delhi: Academic Foundation:127–160.

            40. Van Rijn, F., R. Fort, R. Ruben, T. Koster & G. Beekman (2020) ‘Does certification improve hired labour conditions and wageworker conditions at banana plantations?‘, Agriculture and Human Values, 37 (2):353–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09990-7

            41. Ventura, F.M. (2007) ‘Examining the Rainforest Alliance's agricultural certification robustness’, 1 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1613062

            42. Viswanathan, P.K. (2013) Regional Dimensions of Emerging Labour Shortage in rubber Plantation Sector in Kerala: An Exploratory Analysis, Thiruvananthapuram: Centre for Development Studies.

            43. Viswanathan, P.K. (2016) ‘Labour shortage in rubber sector in Kerala: An analysis’ in K.J. Joseph & P.K. Viswanathan (eds), Globalisation, Development and Plantation Labour in India, New York: Routledge India:196–233.

            44. Viswanathan, P.K. & K.J. Joseph (2016) ‘Tea plantation sector in India: A review of its evolution, growth and labour market outcomes’, unpublished report submitted to the Institute of Social Studies, The Hague.

            45. Viswanathan, P.K. & A. Shah (2009) Challenges, Opportunities and Kerala and the World Economy Imperatives for Techno-Economic and Institutional Reforms under Trade Liberalisation: Case Studies of Tea and Rubber Plantation Sectors in India, Bangladesh: South Asia Network of Economic Research Institutes (SANEI), May.

            46. Viswanathan, P.K. & A. Shah (2016) ‘Gender impact of trade reforms in India: An analysis of tea and rubber production sectors’ in K.J. Joseph & P.K. Viswanathan (eds), Globalisation, Development and Plantation Labour in India, New York: Routledge India:234–265.

            Comments

            Comment on this article