This paper presents a case study of the outsourcing of IT services between 1996 and 2003 by the Government of Ontario using a Public Private Partnership (P3) as an example of the commodification of public services including the impact on labour. It argues that three key features of the arrangement led to it becoming an ‘unequal partnership.’ First, ideological notions of a ‘knowledge economy’ and the techno-wizard status of independent IT workers were used by IT corporations to charge very high corporate rates for the time of outsourced IT staff, despite the fact that they were in fact undergoing a process of proletarianisation. Second, the P3 cost-benefit structure of shared costs and shared payments provided the framework for corporate partners to realise higher profits from investment in privatised state activities. Third, the explicit support of influential state and near-state actors undermined opposition to P3 projects.
Accenture web site. Accessed on December 18, 2013 from: http://newsroom.accenture.com/fact+sheet/.
Altvater, E. (2004) ‘What Happens When Public Goods are Privatized?’, Studies in Political Economy , 74, Autumn:50–57.
Auditor General of Ontario (various years) Office of the Provincial Auditor, Annual Reports Bell, D. (1974) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society , London: Heinemann Educational.
Borins, S. (2003) ‘Contracting and Partnerships in IT Services to Government’, Report to the Panel on the Role of Government, October.
CGI web site. Accessed on 12 December, 2013 from: http://www.cgi.com/sites/default/files/pdf/cgi-fiscal-results-2013.pdf.
CSC web site. Accessed on 12 December, 2013 from: http://assets1.csc.com/investor_relations/downloads/CSC_AnnualReport_2014_10K.pdf.
Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow & J. Tinkler (2006) Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and e-Government , Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Florida, R. (2012) The Rise of the Creative Class: Revisited , New York: Basic Books.
Grievance Settlement Board (2002) The Trillium Award ‘In the Matter of an Arbitration under the Crown Employees Collective Bargaining Act before the Grievance Settlement Board between the Ontario Public Service Employees Union and the Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care).’ GSB#1942/94, 0952/00. 20 February.
Hickling Lewis and Brod Inc. (1999) Business Transformation Project Review. Volume 2 – Final Report , Ottawa: Government of Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services, February.
Huws, U. (2003) The Making of a Cybertariat: Virtual Work in a Real World , New York: Monthly Review Press.
Huws, U. (2008) ‘The New Gold Rush: The New Multinationals and the Commodification of Public Sector Work’ in Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation 2 (2):1–8).
Information Technology Policy Branch, Services Division (1995) Common Purpose Procurement, A Deputy Minister's Guide , Management Board Secretariat, Government of Ontario, 15 November.
Leys, C. (2001) Market-driven Politics: Neoliberal Democracy and the Public Interest , London: Verso.
Marx, K. (1976) Capital, volume 1: A Critique of Political Economy , London and New York: Penguin Books.
Ontario Civil Service Commission (1982) Survey: Systems Community Use of Consultants , February.
Ontario Legislature (various years) Hansard .
Ontario Legislature (1999) Minutes of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCPA) , 16 December.
Osborne, D. & T. Gaebler (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector , New York: Addison-Wesley.
Rapaport, D. (2014) Rewiring the State: the Privatization of Information Technology in Ontario (1973–2002) , PhD dissertation. The Canadian Studies Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada, November.
Speers, K. (2007) ‘The Invisible Private Service: Consultants and Public Policy in Canada’ in L. Dobuzinskis, D. H. Laycock & M. Howlett, (eds) Policy Analysis in Canada , Toronto: University of Toronto Press:399–422.
Stanimirovic, D. & M. Vintar (2011) ‘Outsourcing of IT Projects in the Public Sector – Sustainable Solution or Erosion of the Public Sector?’, M. Klun, M. Decman & T. Jukić (eds) The Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on E-Government , Faculty of Administration, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, 16–17 June, ReadingAcademic Publishing Ltd.:522–530.