This article proves that the productivity defined rigorously within the Marxist theory of value is what economists use most of the time. When analyzing the changes in productivity of a country or the relationship between real wages and productivity or comparing the levels of productivity between countries, labor productivity is used and not, for example, multifactor productivity. In all three previous cases what legitimizes the use of labor productivity is the Marxist theory of value. We will see in the present article that, if productivity is defined as the reciprocal of the value of a basket of merchandises, the mathematical expressions commonly used in applied economics are deduced to understand the variations and levels of productivity and the link between that variable and the real wage. Since most non-Marxist economists reject Marxian theory of value, we conclude that, nonetheless, they use it without knowing it.
Baumol, W., S. Blackman, and E. Wolff. 1989. Productivity and American Leadership. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Buchele, R., and J. Christiansen. 1999. “Labor Relations and Productivity Growth in Advanced Capitalist Economies.” Review of Radical Political Economics 31 (1): 87–110.
Gillman, J. 1956. The Falling Rate of Profit. London: Dennis Dobson.
Gouverneur, J. 2002. Comprender la economía [Understanding the Economy]. Louvain-la-Neuve: Diffusion Universitaire CIACO.
Laibman, D. 1999. “Productive and Unproductive Labor: A Comment.” Review of Radical Political Economics 31 (2): 61–73.
Marx, K. (1857–1858) 1973. Grundrisse der Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie [Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy]. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
Morishima, M. 1973. Marx's Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth. London: Cambridge University Press.
Moseley, F. 1991. The Falling Rate of Profit in the Postwar United States Economy. London: Macmillan Press.
Seton, F. 1957. “The ‘Transformation Problem.'” The Review of Economic Studies 24 (3): 149–160.
Weisskopf, T., S. Bowles, and D. Gordon. 1983. “Hearts and Minds: A Social Model of U.S. Productivity Growth.” Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 14 (2): 381–450.