Political Economy of Strong Power :  Formulation of The Problem

Grimalyuk, Andrey; Danylina, Svetlana

doi:10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.12.3.0348

ScienceOpen: research and publishing network

For Publishers

For Researchers

Blog
About

Search
Advanced search

323

views

recommends

If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

The World Review of Political Economy is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals. Furthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

scite_

World Review of Political Economy

Volume 12, Issue 3

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

Political Economy of Strong Power : Formulation of The Problem

Published

research-article

Author(s): Andrey Grimalyuk ^* ^, , Svetlana Danylina ^* ^,

Publication date (Electronic preprint): 01 October 2021

Journal: World Review of Political Economy

Publisher: Pluto Journals

Keywords: methodology, political economy, innovative Marxism, strong power, CPC

Bookmark

Abstract

The article is devoted to the methodological problems of the political economy of socialism. It provides a categorical distinction between the structural and dynamic dependencies of the political-economic system. On the one hand, structural dependence has an object–subject direction, ascending from productive forces to production relations and from them to state power. On the other hand, the direct opposite, subject–object direction is inherent in dynamic dependence, descending from state power to production relations and the conscious use of their objective laws for the development of productive forces. This subject–object dependence reaches its fullest embodiment under conditions of strong power, the standard of which is the political-economic system of contemporary China.

Content

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (doi): 10.13169/worlrevipoliecon

Title: World Review of Political Economy

Abbreviated Title: WRPE

Publisher: Pluto Journals

ISSN (Electronic): 2042-8928

Publication date (Electronic preprint): 01 October 2021

Volume: 12

Issue: 3

Pages: 348-373

Author notes

[* ] Correspondence: Andrey Grimalyuk ( andreigrim01@ 123456gmail.com )

[* ] Correspondence: Svetlana Danylina ( danilynasa@ 123456gmail.com )

Article

DOI: 10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.12.3.0348

SO-VID: c7233bbf-e21a-4255-a7c2-8380fd7b0d13

License:

All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

History

Page count

Pages: 26

References

P. Bardhan 1991. “On the Concept of Power in Economics.” Economics and Politics 3: 265–277.
A. A. Berle, and G. C. Means. (1932) 1991. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. London: Routledge.
D. Bocage 1985. General Economic Theory of Fracois Perroux. Lahman: University Press of America.
R. Boer 2020. “Domenico Losurdo in China: An Insight into the State of Marxist Education and the CPC.” Socialism and Democracy 34: 130–152.
I. A. Boldyrev 2000. “On the History of Soviet Political Economy (to the 80th Anniversary of Anatoly Pokrytan).” [In Ukrainian.] Economy of Ukraine 12: 15–23.
I. A. Boldyrev 2008. “Names: On the History of the Emergence of the Odessa School of Economic Theory.” [In Russian.] Economic Theory 3: 11–20.
E. Cheng 2019. The Creation of Value by Living Labour: A Normative and Empirical Study, vol. 2. London and Istanbul: Canut Press.
S. Clegg 1979. The Theory of Power and Organization. London: Routledge.
R. Desai 2013. Geopolitical Economy: After US Hegemony, Globalization and Empire (The Future of World Capitalism). London: Pluto.
W. M. Dugger 1989. Corporate Power. New York: Greenwood Press.
F. Engels (1878) 1987. “Anti-Dühring. Herr Eugen Dühring’s Revolution in Science. Third Edition.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 25, 3–309. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
F. Engels (1890) 2010. “Engels to Conrad Schmidt, 27 October 1890.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 49, 58–65. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
J. K. Galbraith 1956. American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
J. K. Galbraith 1967. New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
J. K. Galbraith 1973. Economics and the Public Purpose. Вoston: Houghton Mifflin.
J. K. Galbraith 1984. The Anatomy of Power. Bungay, Suffolk: Richard Clay.
J. Habermas (1962) 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity.
J. Habermas 1976. Legitimation Crisis. Cambridge: Polity.
J. Habermas 1984. Theory of Communication Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon.
B. Jessop 1989. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. University Park: Penn State University Press.
B. Jessop 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity.
B. Jessop 2007. State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. Cambridge: Polity.
B. Jessop, and N.-L. Sum. 2006. Beyond the Regulation Approach: Putting Capitalist Economies in Their Place. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
V. I. Kasatkina 1979. Social Form of Labor and Product under Socialism (Questions of Methodology). [In Russian.] Odessa: High School.
D. Losurdo 2014. Liberalism: A Counter-History. London: Verso.
G. Lukács (1923) 2000. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
S. Lukes 1974. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
K. Marx (1842) 1955. Philosophical Manifesto of the Historical School of Law. [In Russian.] In Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 1, 85–92. Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature.
K. Marx (1852) 2010. Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 11, 99–197. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
A. Papandreou 1994. Externality and Institutions. Oxford: Claredon Press.
T. Parsons (1951) 1991. The Social System. London: Routledge.
G. V. Plekhanov (1898) 1961. The Role of the Individual in History. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
A. K. Pokrytan 1971. Production Relations and Economic Laws of Socialism: Essays on the Method of Analysis and Theory. [In Russian.] Moscow: Thought.
A. K. Pokrytan 1978. Historical and Logical in the Economic Theory of Socialism. [In Russian.] Moscow: Thought.
A. K. Pokrytan 1985. The Economic Structure of Socialism: Functioning and Development. [In Russian.] Moscow: Economy.
A. K. Pokrytan 2002. Political Economy. [In Russian.] Odessa: Odessa State Economic University.
A. K. Pokrytan, V. I. Kasatkina, and V. N. Mazur. 1964. Socialist Property. [In Russian.] Moscow: Thought.
K. Polanyi (1944) 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
D. Ricardo (1817) 2015. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
B. Russell 2000. Power. London: Routledge.
C. Schmitt (1932) 2004. Legality and Legitimacy. Durham: Duke University Press.
E. Schutz 1995. “Markets and Power.” [In Russian.] Journal of Economic Issues 4: 1147–1170.
I. V. Stalin (1951) 2018. Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR. [In Russian.] Moscow: Lenand.
Y. Takata 1995. Power Theory of Economics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
A. J. Toynbee (1934–1961) 1987. A Study of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
M. Weber (1921) 2019. Economy and Society: A New Translation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
J. Xi 2020. “Opening Up New Frontiers for Marxist Political Economy in Contemporary China.” Qiushi. http://en.qstheory.cn/2020-11/08/c_560906.htm.
G. Yang 2019. Apology for Marx: A New Reading of Marxism. [In Russian.] Moscow: Chance.
M. I. Zveryakov 2018. “Odessa School and the Modernity.” [In Ukrainian.] Economic Theory 2: 5–21.
M. I. Zveryakov 2021. “Scientific Heritage of A. K. Pokrytan in the Light of Contemporary Problems.” [In Ukrainian.] Economy of Ukraine 1 (710): 85–93.

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] P. Bardhan 1991. “On the Concept of Power in Economics.” Economics and Politics 3: 265–277.

[2] A. A. Berle, and G. C. Means. (1932) 1991. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. London: Routledge.

[3] D. Bocage 1985. General Economic Theory of Fracois Perroux. Lahman: University Press of America.

[4] R. Boer 2020. “Domenico Losurdo in China: An Insight into the State of Marxist Education and the CPC.” Socialism and Democracy 34: 130–152.

[5] I. A. Boldyrev 2000. “On the History of Soviet Political Economy (to the 80th Anniversary of Anatoly Pokrytan).” [In Ukrainian.] Economy of Ukraine 12: 15–23.

[6] I. A. Boldyrev 2008. “Names: On the History of the Emergence of the Odessa School of Economic Theory.” [In Russian.] Economic Theory 3: 11–20.

[7] E. Cheng 2019. The Creation of Value by Living Labour: A Normative and Empirical Study, vol. 2. London and Istanbul: Canut Press.

[8] S. Clegg 1979. The Theory of Power and Organization. London: Routledge.

[9] R. Desai 2013. Geopolitical Economy: After US Hegemony, Globalization and Empire (The Future of World Capitalism). London: Pluto.

[10] W. M. Dugger 1989. Corporate Power. New York: Greenwood Press.

[11] F. Engels (1878) 1987. “Anti-Dühring. Herr Eugen Dühring’s Revolution in Science. Third Edition.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 25, 3–309. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

[12] F. Engels (1890) 2010. “Engels to Conrad Schmidt, 27 October 1890.” In Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 49, 58–65. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

[13] J. K. Galbraith 1956. American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

[14] J. K. Galbraith 1967. New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

[15] J. K. Galbraith 1973. Economics and the Public Purpose. Вoston: Houghton Mifflin.

[16] J. K. Galbraith 1984. The Anatomy of Power. Bungay, Suffolk: Richard Clay.

[17] J. Habermas (1962) 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity.

[18] J. Habermas 1976. Legitimation Crisis. Cambridge: Polity.

[19] J. Habermas 1984. Theory of Communication Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon.

[20] B. Jessop 1989. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. University Park: Penn State University Press.

[21] B. Jessop 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity.

[22] B. Jessop 2007. State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. Cambridge: Polity.

[23] B. Jessop, and N.-L. Sum. 2006. Beyond the Regulation Approach: Putting Capitalist Economies in Their Place. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

[24] V. I. Kasatkina 1979. Social Form of Labor and Product under Socialism (Questions of Methodology). [In Russian.] Odessa: High School.

[25] D. Losurdo 2014. Liberalism: A Counter-History. London: Verso.

[26] G. Lukács (1923) 2000. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

[27] S. Lukes 1974. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.

[28] K. Marx (1842) 1955. Philosophical Manifesto of the Historical School of Law. [In Russian.] In Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 1, 85–92. Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature.

[29] K. Marx (1852) 2010. Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 11, 99–197. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

[30] A. Papandreou 1994. Externality and Institutions. Oxford: Claredon Press.

[31] T. Parsons (1951) 1991. The Social System. London: Routledge.

[32] G. V. Plekhanov (1898) 1961. The Role of the Individual in History. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

[33] A. K. Pokrytan 1971. Production Relations and Economic Laws of Socialism: Essays on the Method of Analysis and Theory. [In Russian.] Moscow: Thought.

[34] A. K. Pokrytan 1978. Historical and Logical in the Economic Theory of Socialism. [In Russian.] Moscow: Thought.

[35] A. K. Pokrytan 1985. The Economic Structure of Socialism: Functioning and Development. [In Russian.] Moscow: Economy.

[36] A. K. Pokrytan 2002. Political Economy. [In Russian.] Odessa: Odessa State Economic University.

[37] A. K. Pokrytan, V. I. Kasatkina, and V. N. Mazur. 1964. Socialist Property. [In Russian.] Moscow: Thought.

[38] K. Polanyi (1944) 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.

[39] D. Ricardo (1817) 2015. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[40] B. Russell 2000. Power. London: Routledge.

[41] C. Schmitt (1932) 2004. Legality and Legitimacy. Durham: Duke University Press.

[42] E. Schutz 1995. “Markets and Power.” [In Russian.] Journal of Economic Issues 4: 1147–1170.

[43] I. V. Stalin (1951) 2018. Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR. [In Russian.] Moscow: Lenand.

[44] Y. Takata 1995. Power Theory of Economics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

[45] A. J. Toynbee (1934–1961) 1987. A Study of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[46] M. Weber (1921) 2019. Economy and Society: A New Translation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

[47] J. Xi 2020. “Opening Up New Frontiers for Marxist Political Economy in Contemporary China.” Qiushi. http://en.qstheory.cn/2020-11/08/c_560906.htm.

[48] G. Yang 2019. Apology for Marx: A New Reading of Marxism. [In Russian.] Moscow: Chance.

[49] M. I. Zveryakov 2018. “Odessa School and the Modernity.” [In Ukrainian.] Economic Theory 2: 5–21.

[50] M. I. Zveryakov 2021. “Scientific Heritage of A. K. Pokrytan in the Light of Contemporary Problems.” [In Ukrainian.] Economy of Ukraine 1 (710): 85–93.