This article argues that to make progress in the theory of value and price we must incorporate in the debate of the transformation problem the methodological discussion about how Marxian economics relates to non-Marxian economics. Two alternative approaches to deal with that relationship are presented in a stylized form, called the “pure-blood Marxian approach” and the “muggle Marxian approach.” Two examples of the “muggle Marxian approach,” represented by two of the most influential communists working in the field of academic economics in the West in the 20th century, Piero Sraffa and Oskar Lange, are presented to show the superiority of this approach over the “pure-blood Marxian approach.”
F. Engels (1885) 1963. “Vorwort.” In Karl Marx—Friedrich Engels—Werke, Band 24. Das Kapital, Bd. II [Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 24. Capital, vol. II]. Berlin/DDR: Dietz Verlag.
B. Fine 2017. “Neither Equilibrium as Such Nor as Abstraction: Debating Fred Moseley’s Transformation.” International Journal of Political Economy 46 (1): 22–28.
H. D. Kurz 1979. “Review of Sraffa after Marx by Ian Steedman.” Australian Economic Papers 18: 52–70.
D. Laibman 2018a. “Money and Totality: Another Round of Debate on Value Formation and Transformation.” World Review of Political Economy 9 (1): 21–40.
D. Laibman 2018b. “Which Way Forward for Marxist Value Theory? A Rejoinder to Moseley.” World Review of Political Economy 9 (3): 410–419.
D. Laibman 2021. “Value and Price: Controversy, Stasis, and Possibility.” World Review of Political Economy 12 (4): 427–435.
O. Lange (1959) 1963. Political Economy: Vol. 1, General Problems. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
T. Lopes 2021. “Technical or Political? The Socialist Economic Calculation Debate.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 45 (4): 787–810.
S. Mohun, and R. Veneziani. 2017. “Equal and Unequal Exchange in the Labor Theory of Value: Comments on Moseley.” International Journal of Political Economy 46 (1): 35–42.
F. Moseley 2016. Money and Totality: A Macro-monetary Interpretation of Marx’s Logic in Capital and the End of the “Transformation Problem.” Chicago: Haymarket Books.
F. Moseley 2018. “Which Way Forward: Marx’s Theory or Sraffa’s Theory? A Reply to Laibman.” World Review of Political Economy 9 (2): 148–163.
E. F. S. Prado 2017. “Moseley on Marx’s Method.” International Journal of Political Economy 46 (1): 29–34.
M. Roberts 2016. “Consistent, Realistic, Verifiable: Review of Money and Totality by Fred Moseley.” Weekly Worker, April 28. Accessed April 20, 2021 . https://weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/1104/consistent-realistic-verifiable/.
P. Sraffa 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
I. Steedman 1977. Marx after Sraffa. London: NLB.