452
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      The World Review of Political Economy is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

       

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Value Production, Measurement, and Distribution under Digital Capitalism : A Critique of the Theory That the Law of Value Has Failed

      Published
      research-article
      * ,
      World Review of Political Economy
      Pluto Journals
      digital capital, law of value, productive and non-productive labor, information rent, the measure of value
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Western Marxist scholars take “immaterial labor,” “audience labor” and “prosumer labor” as the core categories to explain the problem of the value creation and profit sources of digital capital in online production and consumption activities in the Web 2.0 era. By analyzing the production process of digital capitalism, they have come to the conclusion that contemporary capitalist production has taken on an overall “novel” character. On the basis of the special cost structure of digital capitalist production, the increasing “fuzziness” of production time and living time, and the disappearance of the boundary between paid labor and unpaid labor under digital capitalism, they draw the conclusion that the law of value has become invalid in the era of “digital production and consumption.” However, once digital labor and its results are placed within Marx’s analytical framework, and are interpreted in terms of such categories as “direct production process of capitalism,” “fixed capital accumulation pattern” and “classification of productive labor and non-productive labor,” it becomes clear that the brilliant achievements of digital capital are best understood as the results of innovative modes of surplus-value possession or distribution, rather than of new methods of surplus-value creation, and that the conclusion that the law of value has failed represents a misreading or misinterpretation of Marx’s labor theory of value. Although the digital capitalist mode of production is serving partially to dissipate the role of the law of value, this law as the general principle regulating global capitalist production remains effective in the contemporary world.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.13169/worlrevipoliecon
            World Review of Political Economy
            WRPE
            Pluto Journals
            2042-8928
            01 December 2021
            : 12
            : 4
            : 472-492
            Author notes
            [* ] Correspondence: Xu Wei ( weixujlcd@ 123456163.com )
            Article
            10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.12.4.0472
            bf244d32-2342-42f1-92a4-a1f209012c20
            © WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR POLITICAL ECONOMY 2021

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Pages: 21
            Categories
            Articles

            Political economics
            the measure of value,information rent,productive and non-productive labor,law of value,digital capital

            References

            1. , and . 2012. “Value in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet.” The Information Society 28 (3): 135–150.

            2. , and . 2002. Regulation Theory: The State of the Art. London: Routledge.

            3. 2010. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.

            4. Facebook Inc. 2013. “Bloomberg Businessweek.” January 2, Form: 10-K.

            5. 2013. “Rethinking Financial Capitalism and the ‘Information’ Economy.” Review of Radical Political Economics 45 (3): 257–268.

            6. 2010. “Labor in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet.” The Information Society 26 (3): 179–196.

            7. 2011. “A Contribution to the Critique of the Political Economy of Google.” Fast Capitalism. Accessed April 25, 2019 . http://www.uta.edu/huma/agger/fastcapitalism/8_1/fuchs8_1.

            8. 2012. “With or without Marx? With or without Capitalism? A Rejoinder to Adam Arvidsson and Eleanor Colleoni.” Triple 10 (2): 633–645.

            9. , and . 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

            10. , and . 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. London: Penguin Books.

            11. 1983. Late Capitalism. [In Chinese.] Harbin: Heilongjiang People’s Publishing House.

            12. , and . 2010a. Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 28. Digital edition. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

            13. , and . 2010b. Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 29. Digital edition. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

            14. , and . 2010c. Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 34. Digital edition. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

            15. , and . 2010d. Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 35. Digital edition. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

            16. , and . 2010e. Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 36. Digital edition. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

            17. , and . 1999. “Value and Affect.” Boundary 2 26 (2): 77–88.

            18. , and . 2020. “Productive and Unproductive Labour: An Attempt at Clarification and Classification.” [In Chinese.] Translated by . Contemporary Economic Studies, no. 6: 39–53.

            19. 2000. Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

            20. 1977. “Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism.” Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory 1 (3): 1–27.

            21. 2000. “Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy.” Social Text 18 (2): 33–58.

            22. 1980. The Third Wave. New York: William Morrow.

            23. 1999. “Wages, Rent and Profit in Cognitive Capitalism.” Paper presented at the 16th Historical Materialism Conference, London, November 7–10.

            24. 2004. “Las políticas de desarrollo en tiempos del capitalism cognitivo” [Cognitive Development Policy in the Capitalist Era]. In Capitalismo cognitivo, propiedad intelectual y creación colectiva [Cognitive Capitalism, Intellectual Property and Collective Creation], edited by and , 63–74. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.

            25. 2007. “From Formal Subsumption to General Intellect: Elements for a Marxist Reading of the Thesis of Cognitive Capitalism.” Historical Materialism 15 (1): 13–36.

            26. 2009. “Crisis de la ley del valor y devenir renta de la ganancia. Apuntes sobre la crisis sistémica del capitalismo cognitivo” [Crisis of the Law of Value, Income Which Becomes Profits: The Systematic Crisis of Cognitive Capitalism]. In En La Gran crisis de la economía global [The Great Crisis of Global Economy], edited by , 63–98. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.

            27. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy: Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

            Comments

            Comment on this article