- Record: found
- Abstract: found
- Article: found
The Trend to Widening Wealth and Income Inequality in Sweden and its Causes
Abstract
Sweden is a model of social democracy in which the Social Democratic Party has long been in power, and in which distribution under the conditions of monopoly capitalism has been the object of one-sided praise. Wealth and income inequality in Sweden was in the past relatively low, but in recent years has shown a tendency to undergo a structural increase, and some indicator values are already at comparatively high levels. Investigating the causes, we find that the ownership structure of the means of production, dominated by monopoly capitalist private ownership, has played a decisive role in the creation and evolution of wealth and income inequality within Sweden. The Swedish welfare system, whose core elements are social security provisions and the tax system, has played an important role in alleviating wealth and income inequality and in promoting social equity, but the degree of adjustment it achieves is relatively limited, and it now faces challenges in ensuring its sustainability. In recent years, the weakening of the organizational strength of trade unions in Sweden has resulted in an imbalance between the power of labor and capital, an imbalance that to some extent has promoted the widening of wealth and income inequality. With the deepening of the basic contradiction of capitalism, the trend to widening wealth and income inequality in Sweden represents a historical inevitability.
Content
Author and article information
References
Credit Suisse. 2019. “ Global Wealth Databook 2019.” https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/about-us/research/publications/global-wealth-databook-2019.pdf.
F. GaoH. Shi. 2009. The Mode of Swedish Social Democracy: Review and Literature. [In Chinese.] Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Press.
A. Giddens 2000. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. [In Chinese.] Beijing: Peking University Press.
J. Hinnfors 2014. “ A New Careful and Pragmatic Party Programme: Review of the 2013 Party Programme of the Swedish Social Democratic Party.” [In Chinese.] Contemporary World and Socialism, no. 1: 131– 134.
L. Li 2020. “ Research on the Income Gap of China’s Residents: Analysis of International Comparisons with Japan, Sweden, Germany, Singapore, UK, US and France.” [In Chinese.] Journal of Economics of Shanghai School 18 ( 1): 131– 150.
H. Liu 2007. “ Research on the Cooperation between Labor, Capital and Politics: The Case of Sweden.” [In Chinese.] Master thesis, the Party School of the Central Committee of Communist Party of China.
K. Marx 2010. Capital, vol. 1. Volume 35 of Marx and Engels Collected Works. Digital edition. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
NIER (National Institute of Economic Research). 2018. “ The Swedish Economy March 2018.” https://www.konj.se/download/18.74a0f70a1633265bd89564c8/1527085538610/SEMar2018_v2.pdf.
T. Piketty 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. [In Chinese.] Beijing: CITIC Press Group.
SCB. 2018a. “ Private Enterprises Carry Out 18 Percent of the Activities in Health Care, Education and Social Services.” https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/public-finances/local-government-finances/financiers-and-providers-within-education-health-care-and-social-services/pong/statistical-news/financiers-and-providers-in-health-care-education-and-social-services-in-2016/.
SCB. 2018b. “ Number of Employees in Private Sector Increased.” https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/labour-market/labour-force-surveys/labour-force-surveys-lfs/pong/statistical-news/labour-force-surveys-lfs-1st-quarter-2018/.
SCB. 2019. “ Social Services Had Largest Share of Activities Carried Out by Private Enterprises.” https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/public-finances/local-government-finances/financiers-and-providers-within-education-health-care-and-social-services/pong/statistical-news/financiers-and-providers-in-health-care-education-and-social-services-in-2017/.
SCB. 2020a. “ Income Inequality Indicators, Equalised Disposable and Primary Income including All Capital Income, 1991–2018, 2018 Prices.” https://www.scb.se/contentassets/af5d03d4fbc94a7cb1e1fa9223035dec/0a-indikatorer-inkomstfordelning-1975–2018-en.xlsx.
SCB. 2020b. “ Net Income by Municipalities 2018 for Women and Men.” https://www.scb.se/contentassets/0e567f5a2d75485a8928de2022d95925/nettoinkomst-percentiler-kommun-2018-english.xls.
SCB. 2020c. “ Number of Persons Receiving Economic Support Decreased.” https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/household-finances/general-statistics/household-finances-general-statistics/pong/statistical-news/number-of-full-year-persons-receiving-social-assistannce-and-benefits-2019/.
F. SuL. Wei, eds. 2009. The Social Security System in Sweden. [In Chinese.] Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
B. von Sydow 2009. “ Comments on the Party Programme of the Swedish Social Democratic Party.” [In Chinese.] Contemporary World and Socialism, no. 3: 61– 64.
C. Xu 2007. “ The Historical Process of the Swedish Model and Its Experience and Lessons.” [In Chinese.] Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), no. 4: 15– 24.
R. ZhangW. Liu. 2014. “ Inspiration from the Localization and Privatization of the Social Public Service in Sweden.” [In Chinese.] China National Conditions and Strength, no. 8: 68– 70.