568
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      The World Review of Political Economy is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

       

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Confucian Economics: The World at Work

      Published
      research-article
      World Review of Political Economy
      Pluto Journals
      Confucian economics, family structure, work ethics
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Chinese have their school of economics. Not recognized as a discipline, it can be extracted from Confucian doctrine. Called here “Confucian economics,” it is a form of ethics. Its seven consecutive principles are identified for the first time. They differ from and overlap with the corresponding principles of liberal economics. People are assumed to seek posterity rather than care for “instant gratification.” Physical resources they need are not viewed as scarce but as abundant. To survive under abundance, people rely on their work effort rather than try to take resources away from others. “Work ethics” and not a “profit margin” is a key motive. People work not for themselves but for others, basically families. As a source of moral rules, family is viewed as the main “work unit” and not the individual. Equality of income is paramount for retaining social peace, which precedes economic efficiency. Built on Confucian principles, economic system is basically a market system. However, it is animated not by individuals but by families. This design is called here “Confucian system.” Rather than to build based on liberal economics “capitalist system,” recent China is rebuilding “Confucian system.” Drawn from ancient teachings, “Confucian economics” is China's modernity.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.13169
            worlrevipoliecon
            World Review of Political Economy
            Pluto Journals
            2042891X
            20428928
            Summer 2015
            : 6
            : 2
            : 208-251
            Article
            worlrevipoliecon.6.2.0208
            10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.6.2.0208
            fed1afb0-cc2e-4724-b0c5-fd7275cdb578
            Copyright 2015 World Association for Political Economy

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Categories
            Articles

            Political economics
            family structure,work ethics,Confucian economics

            References

            1. 1958. The Human Condition . Chicago: Chicago University Press.

            2. 1981. The Treatise on Family . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

            3. , ed. 2008. Confucian Political Ethics . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

            4. 1935. The Spirit of Man in Asian Art . New York: Harvard University Press.

            5. , , and 2014. “From Divergence to Convergence: Reevaluating the History behind China's Economic Boom.” Journal of Economic Literature 52 (1): 45–123.

            6. 1979. Afterthoughts on Material Civilization and Capitalism . Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

            7. (1911) 1974. The Economic Principles of Confucius and His School . 2 vols. Honolulu: Honolulu University Press. First print 1911.

            8. 2013. “The Effect of Language on Economic Behavior: Evidence from Savings Rates, Health Behaviors, and Retirement Assets.” American Economic Review 103 (2): 690–731.

            9. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.” New York Times Magazine , September 13. http://doc.cat-v.org/economics/milton_friedman/business_social_responsibility.

            10. 1956. The Art of Loving . New York: Harper & Row.

            11. 1989. “The End of History.” National Interest 16 (3): 3–18.

            12. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man . New York: Free Press.

            13. 2011. “Lunch with the FT: Francis Fukuyama.” Financial Times , May 27. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/87512bac-87e5-11e0-a6de-00144feabdc0.html.

            14. 1975. US Power and the Multinational Corporations . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

            15. 1987. Political Economy of International Relations . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

            16. 1985. “Why Chinese Work So Hard? Reflections on Entrepreneurial Ethics.” Modern China 11 (2): 203–26.

            17. 1988. Fatal Conceit . Chicago: Chicago University Press.

            18. (1651) 2012. Leviathan: Critical Edition . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

            19. 2012. “Sinicization in Comparative Perspective.” In Sinicization and the Rise of China , edited by , 209–41. New York: Routledge.

            20. 2004. The End of Art . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

            21. 1998. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations . New York: W.W. Norton.

            22. 1988. Off Rule and Revenue . Berkeley: University of California Press.

            23. 1938. The Wisdom of Confucius . New York: Random House; The Modern Library.

            24. 1998. Can Asians Think? Singapore: Times Books International.

            25. (1798) 1993. An Essay on the Principle of Population . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

            26. 2001. Love and Economics: Why the Laissez-Faire Family Doesn't Work . Dallas: Spence.

            27. 1971. Intellectual Foundations of China . New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

            28. 1996. Growing Out of the Plan. Chinese Economic Reform 1978–1993 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

            29. 2009. The Essential Mengzi: Selected Passages with Traditional Commentary . Indianapolis: Hackett.

            30. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History . New York: W.W. Norton.

            31. 2013. Development Patterns of Central and East European Countries . Unpublished manuscript. Vienna: WIIW.

            32. 1994. Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Times . Boston: Beacon Press.

            33. 2013. The Great Divergence: China, Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

            34. 1988. The Poverty of Historicism . London: Routledge.

            35. , and 2015. “Comparison of Patterns of Convergence among ‘Emerging Economies’ of Central Europe, Eastern Europe and Central Asia.” Comparative Economic Research 18 (1): 1–23.

            36. 2012, “State Condition, Foreign Influence and Alternative Models of Market Reforms in China, Russia and Eastern Europe.” International Critical Thought 2 (3): 276–96.

            37. 2011. “Human Resources and China's Long Economic Boom.” Asia Policy 12 (1): 33–78.

            38. 1959. Principles of Chinese Painting . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

            39. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy . New York: Harper.

            40. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments . London: Strand.

            41. 1939. Three Ways of Thought in Ancient China . London: George Allen & Unwin.

            42. 1776. Wealth of Nations . London: W. Strahan.

            43. 1951. The Religion of China . Glencoe: Free Press.

            44. 1992. International Theory: The Three Traditions . London: Holmes & Meier Publishers.

            45. 2014. The Governance of China . Beijing: Foreign Language Press.

            Comments

            Comment on this article