252
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      The World Review of Political Economy is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

       

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Decent Work Deficit in India: A Disaggregated Trend over the Three Post-Reform Decades

      research-article
      World Review of Political Economy
      Pluto Journals
      decent work, social security, social dialogue, rural-urban gap, gender gap
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Decent work is one of the fundamental dimensions of the quality of life, as a large part of our lifetime is spent on working. Besides, this gives a sense of fulfilment and dignity. Apart from this, according to International Labour Organization, decent work is central to sustainable poverty reduction and is a means for achieving equitable, inclusive and sustainable development. This article is an attempt to measure the extent of decent work in India with the help of certain dimensions and indicators developed by International Labour Organization on decent work. It is based on Government of India's published data mainly on four quinquennial rounds: 1993–94, 1999–2000, 2004–05 and 2009–10. This article fundamentally suggests that there is a deficit in decent work in India, and over time, this deficit is increasing. Apart from this, there exist rural-urban gaps as well as gender gaps and most of these gaps are increasing over time. Besides, the condition of even the regular salaried/wage workers seems to be poor in terms of social security benefits and the freedom of association. It is also found out that though the growth in the service sectors and the organised manufacturing sectors may contribute to the quantity of employment, but from the perspectives of quality like social security and social dialogue of the regular salaried/wage workers, it seems to have negative and significant effect. This article finds out that growth may not be sufficient to ensure quality of employment in general.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.13169
            worlrevipoliecon
            World Review of Political Economy
            Pluto Journals
            2042891X
            20428928
            Winter 2016
            : 7
            : 4
            : 486-510
            Article
            worlrevipoliecon.7.4.0486
            10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.7.4.0486
            f541b557-ede9-4564-a987-d5ce3a461e15
            © 2016 World Association for Political Economy

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Categories
            Articles

            Political economics
            social security,decent work,social dialogue,rural-urban gap,gender gap

            References

            1. 2009. “Employment Growth in Rural India: Distress-Driven?” Economic & Political Weekly 44 (16): 97–104.

            2. 2013. “Missing Labour or Consistent ‘De-feminisation’?” Economic & Political Weekly 48 (31): 99–108.

            3. BRICS Report. 2012. A Study of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa with Special Focus on Synergies and Complementarities . New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

            4. . 2011. “Employment Trends in India: A Re-examination.” Economic & Political Weekly 46 (37): 43–59.

            5. IHD (Institute for Human Development). 2014. India Labour and Employment Report 2014 . New Delhi: Academic Foundation.

            6. ILO (International Labour Office). 2002. Decent Work and the Informal Economy . Report VI. Geneva: ILO.

            7. ILO. 2008. Decent Work Indicators for Asia and the Pacific: A Guidebook for Policy-Makers and Researchers . Bangkok: Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, ILO.

            8. ILO. 2012. Decent Work Indicators: Concepts and Definitions . Geneva: ILO.

            9. Ministry of Human Affairs. 2014. Population Census 2001 and 2011 . New Delhi: Government of India. Accessed November 27, 2014. www.censusindia.gov.in.

            10. Ministry of Rural Development. 2010. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005 . Report to the people. New Delhi: Department of Rural Development, Government of India.

            11. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. 2011. Time-Series Data on Annual Survey of Industries (1998–99 to 2007–08) . Kolkata: Central Statistics Office, Government of India.

            12. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. 2013. SAARC Development Goals India Country Report . New Delhi: Central Statistics Office, Government of India.

            13. NCEUS (National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector). 2009. The Challenge of Employment in India, an Informal Perspective , vol. 1. Main report. New Delhi: Government of India.

            14. NSSO (National Sample Survey Organization). 1997. Employment and Unemployment Situation in India, 1993–94 . New Delhi: Government of India.

            15. NSSO. 1998. Unorganized Manufacturing Enterprises in India: Salient Features, 1994–95 . New Delhi: Government of India.

            16. NSSO. 2001a. Employment and Unemployment Situation in India, 1999–2000 . New Delhi: Government of India.

            17. NSSO. 2001b. Informal Sector in India, 1999–2000 . New Delhi: Government of India.

            18. NSSO. 2002. Unorganized Manufacturing Sector in India, 2000–01 . New Delhi: Government of India.

            19. NSSO. 2006. Employment and Unemployment Situation in India, 2004–05 . New Delhi: Government of India.

            20. NSSO. 2007. Informal Sector and Conditions of Employment in India, 2004–05 . New Delhi: Government of India.

            21. NSSO. 2008. Unorganized Manufacturing Sector in India, 2005–06 . New Delhi: Government of India.

            22. NSSO. 2011. Employment and Unemployment Situation in India, 2009–10 . New Delhi: Government of India.

            23. NSSO. 2012a. Informal Sector and Conditions of Employment in India, 2009–10 . New Delhi: Government of India.

            24. NSSO. 2012b. Key Results of Survey on Unincorporated Non-agricultural Enterprises (Excluding Construction) in India, 2010–11 . New Delhi: Government of India.

            25. , and . 2012. Growth and Structure of Employment in India: Long-Term and Post-Reform Performance and the Emerging Challenge . New Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.

            26. Planning Commission, Government of India. 2014. Survey on Business Regulatory Environment for Manufacturing—State Level Assessment . New Delhi: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India Private Limited.

            27. , and . 2010. “Women, Work, and Employment Outcomes in Rural India.” Economic & Political Weekly 45 (28): 49–63.

            28. 2014. “The Demographic Challenge and Employment Growth in India.” Economic & Political Weekly 49 (6): 15–17.

            29. , and . 2007. “Growth of Employment (1993–94 to 2004–05): Illusion of Inclusiveness.” Economic & Political Weekly 42 (3): 196–99.

            Comments

            Comment on this article