2,637
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      The World Review of Political Economy is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

       

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      David Harvey's Theory of Accumulation by Dispossession: A Marxist Critique

      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            David Harvey is well known for his extensive writings on accumulation by dispossession (ABD). ABD refers to “the continuation and proliferation of accretion practices” that Marx had designated as “primitive accumulation.” Harvey has sought to update Marx's theory of primitive accumulation to consider the ways in which dispossession occurs in present-day capitalism in its various forms. His theory of ABD is very problematic. Yet a comprehensive, critical assessment of Harvey's work on dispossession that considers its intellectual and political problems is missing. This article considers Harvey's ideas advanced since the 1980s to be problematic on multiple grounds. To begin, the concept of ABD itself is chaotic in the critical-realist philosophical sense: it includes processes which bear no internal relations, and it separates processes which should not be separated. He inflates the causal significance of the concept far too much, and mistakenly considers ABD to be the dominant moment of contemporary capitalism. He generally fails to connect ABD of producers to what I will call “accumulation by exploitation” of proletarians and semi-proletarians. His views on dispossession in the South with which he associates (new) imperialism are inadequate in part because he abstracts from the exploitative character of imperialism as it is rooted in production controlled by imperialist businesses. And the political implications of his theory, which significantly differ from the conclusions that Marx draws from his own analysis of dispossession in Capital vol. 1, and which have a dim view of the role of the working class in the anti-capitalist socialist movement, are reformist.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.13169
            worlrevipoliecon
            World Review of Political Economy
            Pluto Journals
            2042891X
            20428928
            Winter 2017
            : 8
            : 4
            : 590-616
            Article
            worlrevipoliecon.8.4.0590
            10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.8.4.0590
            f82fb94f-1d4e-4ef4-9e5c-193910f4a82f
            © 2017 World Association for Political Economy

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Categories
            Articles

            Political economics
            Marx,primitive accumulation,new imperialism,centrality of the working class,capitalism

            References

            1. , and . 2006. “Capital Accumulation and the State System: Assessing David Harvey's The New Imperialism.“ Historical Materialism 14 (4): 107–31.

            2. 2015. “Accumulation by Dispossession and Anti-capitalist Struggles: A Long Historical Perspective.” Science & Society 79 (1): 11–37.

            3. 2011. “Primitive Accumulation and Capitalist Accumulation: Notes on Social Constitution and Expropriation.” Science & Society 75 (3): 379–99.

            4. 2011. “Primitive Accumulation, Capitalist Development and Socialist Transition: Still Waiting for Godot?” Journal of Contemporary Asia 41 (1): 1–24.

            5. 2006. “What Is, and What Is Not Imperialism.” Historical Materialism 14 (4): 79–105.

            6. 2006. “Marxist Theories of the State.” in Alternative Theories of the State , edited by , 64–90. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

            7. 2017. Marxist Class Theory for a Skeptical World . Leiden: Brill.

            8. Forthcoming. “David Harvey's Theory of Uneven Geographical Development: A Marxist Critique.” Capital and Class 41 (3): Forthcoming.

            9. 1999. “Marx's Theory of Primitive Accumulation: A Suggested Reinterpretation.” Accessed May 16, 2017. www.homepages.uel.ac.uk/M.DeAngelis/PRIMACCA.htm.

            10. 1977. “Socialism: Utopian and Scientific.” in Selected Works of Marx and Engels , by and , 95–151. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

            11. 1977. “On So-Called Primitive Accumulation.” Dialectical Anthropology 2 (2): 87–106.

            12. 2016. “Accumulation by Urban Dispossession: Struggles over Urban Space in Accra, Ghana.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (1): 66–77.

            13. 2006. “Primitive Accumulation, Accumulation by Dispossession, Accumulation by ’Extra-Economic’ Means.” Progress in Human Geography 30 (5): 608–25.

            14. , and . 2008. “Imperialism and Resistance: Canadian Mining Companies in Latin America.” Third World Quarterly 29 (1): 63–87.

            15. 2006. “Globalization and Primitive Accumulation: The Contributions of David Harvey's Dialectical Marxism.” in David Harvey: A Critical Reader , edited by and , 167–90. London: Blackwell.

            16. (1982) 2006. The Limits to Capital . London: Verso.

            17. 2003. The New Imperialism . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

            18. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

            19. 2006a. “Introduction.” in The Limits to Capital , ix–xxviii. London: Verso.

            20. 2006b. “Comment on Commentaries.” Historical Materialism 14 (4): 157–66.

            21. 2006c. Spaces of Global Capitalism . London: Verso.

            22. 2007. “Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science , no. 610: 22–44.

            23. 2010. “The Secret of Primitive Accumulation.” in A Companion to Marx's Capital , by , 289–313. London: Verso.

            24. 2012. Rebel Cities . London: Verso.

            25. 2014. Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

            26. , and . 2010. “Explaining the Crisis.” International Socialist Review , no. 73. Accessed May 16, 2017. http://isreview.org/issue/73/explaining–crisis.

            27. (1899) 1964. “The Development of Capitalism in Russia.” in Collected Works of Lenin , vol. 3, 9–658. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

            28. 1977. “What Is to Be Done?” in Selected Works of Lenin , vol. 1, 92–241. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

            29. 2013. “Marx's Concept of ’Universal Class’: A Rehabilitation.” Science & Society 77 (4): 536–60.

            30. 2003. Accumulation of Capital . London: Routledge.

            31. 1977. Capital , vol. 1. New York: Vintago.

            32. , and . 2017. “What Is Privatization? A Political Economy Approach.” Environment and Planning A 49 (5): 1040–59.

            33. 1978. “Note on Primitive Accumulation in Marx and Preobrazhensky.” Soviet Studies 30 (3): 384–93.

            34. 2003. Dance of the Dialectic . Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

            35. 2008. “The Accumulation Process in the Period of Globalization.” Economic and Political Weekly 43 (26): 108–13. Accessed May 16, 2017. http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/3_10.pdf.

            36. 2000. The Invention of Capitalism: Classical Political Economy and the Secret History of Primitive Accumulation . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

            37. 1992. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach . London: Routledge.

            38. 2010. Global Capitalism in Crisis: Karl Marx & the Decay of the Profit System . Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.

            39. 2008. History of the Russian Revolution . Chicago: Haymarket.

            40. 2013. Marxism and the Oppression of Women . Chicago: Haymarket.

            41. 1998. Retreat from Class . London: Verso.

            42. 2002. The Origins of Capitalism . London: Verso.

            Comments

            Comment on this article