355
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      The World Review of Political Economy is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

       

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Trump's Deja Vu China Trade War

      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            The Trump administration is pursuing a “dual track” trade offensive. Track One, announced with US steel-aluminum tariffs, seeks token adjustments to preexisting trade terms with allies in NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement), Europe, South Korea, and other US bilateral free trade agreements. The recent South Korea-US negotiations represent the soft template. In Track Two, Trump is pursuing a hard line with China. US objectives are threefold: limit technology transfer to China, obtain more access to China markets for US business, and reduce the US current account deficit with China. US elites are internally split, however, on which objective should be given priority: the US defense establishment prioritizes the first, US multinational corporations and trade groups the second, while Trump seeks the third as means to mobilize his domestic political base with evidence that his “economic nationalist” policies are producing results. China's counter to Trump is a “carrot & stick” response offering concessions to the second and third US objectives, while holding firm on the first. The US-China trade dispute should be viewed as a weak US attempt to reproduce Reagan's 1985 Plaza Accord targeting Japan, and Nixon's 1971 abandonment of the Bretton Woods dollar-gold peg standard, targeting Europe. Trump's offense will prove less successful, however. The author predicts a US-China full blown trade war will be averted, as Trump and US capitalists settle for gains in objectives two and three, while denying China acquisitions of US corporations.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.2307/j50005553
            worlrevipoliecon
            World Review of Political Economy
            Pluto Journals
            2042-891X
            2042-8928
            1 October 2018
            : 9
            : 3 ( doiID: 10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.9.issue-3 )
            : 346-363
            Article
            worlrevipoliecon.9.3.0346
            10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.9.3.0346
            e0719a88-27ee-4429-9391-d001c43b1c42
            © 2018 World Association for Political Economy

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Custom metadata
            eng

            Political economics
            China,United States,Plaza Accord,Bretton Woods,economic nationalism,technology transfer

            References

            1. The Congressional Budget Office. 2018. “The Budget and Economic Outlook, 2018–2028.” Accessed April 20, 2018. https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/115th-congress-2017–2018/reports/53651-outlook.pdf.

            2. Crooks, E. 2018. “Washington and Beijing Urged to Bury Hatchet.” Financial Times, April 5: 3.

            3. Davis, B. 2018. “In Trade Fight, China Isn't Like Japan.” New York Times, April 9. Accessed April 21, 2018. https://www.lopinion.fr/edition/wsj/in-trade-fight-china-isn-t-like-japan-146542.

            4. Donnan, S. 2018. “Trump Adopts Steel Tariffs But Opens Door to Exemptions.” Financial Times, March 9. Accessed April 20, 2018. https://www.ft.com/content/149e3d04–22e1–11e8-ae48-60d3531b7d11.

            5. Donnan, S., and E. Feng. 2018. “China Dismisses Talks to Ease US Tension.” Financial Times, April 17: 2.

            6. Irwin, N. 2018. “Trump Authorizes Tariffs, Defying an Array of Allies.” The Wall Street Journal, March 9: 1.

            7. Kaplan, T. 2018. “Congress Approves $1.3 Trillion Spending Bill.” New York Times, March 22. Accessed April 20, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/22/us/politics/house-passes-spending-bill.html.

            8. Lawder, D. 2018. “US Escalates China Trade Showdown with Tariffs on $50 Billion in Imports.” Accessed April 21, 2018. http://wsau.com/news/articles/2018/apr/03/us-unveils-tariffs-on-50-billion-worth-of-chinese-imports/.

            9. Nicholas, P. 2018. “Trump Officials Talk Down Threat of Dueling Tariffs.” The Wall Street Journal, April 9: 2.

            10. Office of the United States Trade Representative. 2018. “Notice of Determination and Request for Public Comment concerning Proposed Determination of Action Pursuant to Section 301: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation.” Docket No. USTR-2018–0005. Accessed April 20, 2018. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/301FRN.pdf.

            11. Rapaport, A., and P. Rao. 2018. “South Korea, Looking to Avoid Tariffs, Agrees to US Trade Deal.” New York Times, March 27: 7.

            12. Rasmus, J. 2006. The War at Home: Corporate Offensives from Reagan to George W. Bush. San Ramon, CA: Kyklos Productions.

            13. Rasmus, J. 2017. Central Bankers at the End of Their Rope? Monetary Policy and the Coming Depression. Atlanta: Clarity Press.

            14. Rasmus, J. 2018. “Trump's Tax Cuts, Budget, Deficits … Trump's Recession 2019?” Accessed April 20, 2018. https://jackrasmus.com/2018/02/14/trumps-tax-cuts-budget-deficits-trumps-recession-2019/.

            15. Shane, D. 2018. “China Hits the United States with Tariffs on $3 Billion of Exports.” Accessed April 21, 2018. http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/02/news/economy/china-us-tariffs-trade/index.html.

            16. Swanson, A., and K. Bradsher. 2018. “President Seems to Double Down on a Trade War.” New York Times, April 6. Accessed April 21, 2018. http://www.carthagerepublicantribune.com/national/president-seems-to-double-down-on-a-trade-war-20180406.

            17. Thomson Reuters. 2018. “US Pressing China to Cut Trade Surplus by $100 Billion.” Accessed April 20, 2018. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/us-pressing-china-to-cut-trade-surplus-by-100-billion-white-house-1824111.

            18. Week in China. 2017. “Big Bang Begins: China to Remove Ceiling for Foreign Ownership in Financial Firms.” Accessed April 21, 2018. https://www.weekinchina.com/2017/11/big-bang-begins/.

            19. White House. 2017. “Presidential Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative.” Accessed April 20, 2018. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-memorandum-united-states-trade-representative/.

            20. Wildau, G., S. Donnan, and E. White. 2018. “US and China ‘Still Very Far Apart’ on Trade, Says US Ambassador.” Financial Times, May 16. Accessed November 27, 2018. https://www.ft.com/content/0f0594d6–57e4–11e8-bdb7-f6677d2e1ce8.

            21. Yang, Y., and E. Feng. 2018. “China's Fighting Talk on Trade War with US Sends Markets Reeling.” Financial Times, April 5: 1.

            22. Yao, K., and C. Shepherd. 2018. “China Blames US for Trade Frictions, Says Negotiations Currently Impossible.” Reuters. Accessed April 21, 2018. https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/china-blames-us-for-trade-frictions-says-negotiations-currently-impossible.

            Comments

            Comment on this article