Blog
About

112
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    12
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparing a Scanning Ambiguous Keyboard to the On-screen QWERTY Keyboard

      , , ,

      Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2017) (EVA)

      Electronic Visualisation and the Arts

      11 – 13 July 2017

      Scanning ambiguous keyboard (SAK), Windows on-screen keyboard (OSK), text entry, accessible interfaces

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper explores text entry on a scanning ambiguous keyboard (SAK) and the Windows on-screen keyboard (OSK) operating in scanning mode. The SPACEBAR was used for physical input with both keyboards. Testing involved 12 participants entering five phrases of text with each keyboard. On entry speed, the means were 5.06 wpm for the SAK and 2.67 wpm for the OSK, thus revealing a significant speed advantage for the SAK. However, the character-level error rate of 13.3% for the SAK was significantly higher than the error rate of 2.4% for the OSK. On subjective preference, 7 of 12 participants preferred the Windows OSK over the SAK, citing familiarity with the QWERTY layout as the most common reason. However, participants appreciated the efficiency of the SAK keyboard. A limitation of the results is the small amount of text entered.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Combining Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges

          In recent years, new research has brought the field of electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain–computer interfacing (BCI) out of its infancy and into a phase of relative maturity through many demonstrated prototypes such as brain-controlled wheelchairs, keyboards, and computer games. With this proof-of-concept phase in the past, the time is now ripe to focus on the development of practical BCI technologies that can be brought out of the lab and into real-world applications. In particular, we focus on the prospect of improving the lives of countless disabled individuals through a combination of BCI technology with existing assistive technologies (AT). In pursuit of more practical BCIs for use outside of the lab, in this paper, we identify four application areas where disabled individuals could greatly benefit from advancements in BCI technology, namely, “Communication and Control”, “Motor Substitution”, “Entertainment”, and “Motor Recovery”. We review the current state of the art and possible future developments, while discussing the main research issues in these four areas. In particular, we expect the most progress in the development of technologies such as hybrid BCI architectures, user–machine adaptation algorithms, the exploitation of users’ mental states for BCI reliability and confidence measures, the incorporation of principles in human–computer interaction (HCI) to improve BCI usability, and the development of novel BCI technology including better EEG devices.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Clio and the Economics of QWERTY

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Conference
                July 2017
                July 2017
                : 1-6
                Affiliations
                University of Central Lancashire

                Preston UK PR1 2HE
                York University

                Toronto Canada M3J 1P3
                10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.103
                © Waddington et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development. Proceedings of British HCI 2017 – Digital Make-Believe, Sunderland, UK.

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2017)
                EVA
                London, UK
                11 – 13 July 2017
                Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
                Electronic Visualisation and the Arts
                Product
                Product Information: 1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development
                Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
                Categories
                Electronic Workshops in Computing

                Comments

                Comment on this article