1,307
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    12
    shares

      Celebrating 65 years of The Computer Journal - free-to-read perspectives - bcs.org/tcj65

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative Evaluation? Yes, But With Which Alternative UI?

      proceedings-article
      1 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 2
      Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2017) (EVA)
      Electronic Visualisation and the Arts
      11 – 13 July 2017
      HCI, UI Design, UI Evaluation, Feedback, CAMELEON reference framework
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            User’s feedback provides valuable information suitable to help designers to improve their work. In this paper, we present a study on user’s feedback when evaluating a User Interface (UI) by comparison. Our aim is to define the properties that the alternative UI must satisfy to maximize the benefits of comparative evaluation. The UIs considered in the study were designed using the CAMELEON Reference Framework (CRF), covering variations at each level of abstraction. We study the impact of each variation on users’ feedback. We show that when the alternative design refers to the same task model as the original one but using a different abstract UI, the number of negative returns is significantly higher, making the comparative evaluation more productive.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2017
            July 2017
            : 1-7
            Affiliations
            [ 1 ]Univ.Tunis ElManar, Faculty

            of Science of Tunis.

            CRISTAL Laboratory
            [ 2 ]Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LIG, F-38000

            Grenoble France
            [ 3 ]National Higher Engineering

            School of Tunis

            Taha Hussein Avenue, Tunis.

            Tunisia
            [ 4 ]CRISTAL Labortory

            National School of Computer

            Sciences, Mannouba University, Tunisia
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.105
            7d47f9ed-1cd7-47b7-aa16-e234ac666eaf
            © Hammami et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development. Proceedings of British HCI 2017 – Digital Make-Believe, Sunderland, UK.

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2017)
            EVA
            London, UK
            11 – 13 July 2017
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Electronic Visualisation and the Arts
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.105
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            HCI,Feedback,UI Design,CAMELEON reference framework,UI Evaluation

            REFERENCES

            1. 2012 What Do You Think? A Case Study of Benefit, Expectation,and Interaction in a Large Online Critique Community Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 295 304

            2. 2010 Designing with Interactive Example Galleries Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (CHI '10) 2257 2266

            3. ConcurTaskTrees April 2017 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ConcurTaskTrees

            4. 2002 Mis-Usability: On the Uses and Misuses of Usability Testing In Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Computer documentation

            5. 2011 Examples Galleries Generated by Interactive Genetic Algorithms . In procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design. 61 71

            6. 2017 Fruitful Feedback: Positive Affective Language and Source Anonymity Improve Critique Reception and Work Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17) 1024 1034

            7. 2003 A Unifying Reference Framework for multi-target user interfaces. Interacting With Computers Vol. 15/3 289 308

            8. 1990 A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design. AI Magazine: Volume 11 Issue 4, Winter 1990

            9. Introduction to Model-Based User Interfaces January 2014 https://www.w3.org/TR/mbui-intro/

            10. 2009 Getting inspired!: understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice Process of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM 2009 87 96

            11. Model-Based UI XG Final Report. on April 2010 https://www.w3.org/2007/uwa/editors-drafts/mbui/Model-Based-UI-XG-FinalReport.html

            12. 2015 Using Anonymity and Communal Efforts to Improve Quality of Crowdsourced Feedback Proceeding of Third AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing HCOMP-15)

            13. 2014 CrowdCrit: Crowdsourcing and Aggregating Visual Design Critique Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 21 24

            14. 2006 Getting the Right Design and the Design Right: Testing Many Is Better Than One Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’2006 1243 1252

            15. 2006 User Sketches: A Quick, Inexpensive, and Effective way to Elicit More Reflective User Feedback Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles (NordiCHI’2006) 105 114

            16. 2015 Innovative Key Features for Mastering Model Complexity: FlexiLab, a Multimodel Editor Illustrated on Task Modeling Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems.

            17. 1992 Does the Fidelity of Software Prototypes Affect the Perception of Usability? In procedings of Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, (1992 399 403

            Comments

            Comment on this article