1,302
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    12
    shares

      Studying business & IT? Drive your professional career forwards with BCS books - for a 20% discount click here: shop.bcs.org

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Industry Ideals Barriers in Using Alternative Privacy Policies

      Published
      proceedings-article
      ,
      Proceedings of the 31st International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI 2017) (HCI)
      digital make-believe, with delegates considering our expansive
      3 - 6 July 2017
      Privacy, Privacy policy, Workshop, Industry, Barriers, Ideals, Attitudes
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            While privacy policies were developed with the aim of helping users understand their participation in the data economy, they often fail to serve this purpose. Highly complex and extensively lengthy policies have resulted in extremely low levels of user interest and engagement, leading to the users being unaware of the personal data exchange they are involved in. There is an increasing interest in industry to shift from this pattern and move towards alternative models of privacy policies that are more engaging and less intimidating to the average user. In this paper, we outline the results of an industry workshop that explores service provider views, ideals and challenges associated with the move towards alternative models of privacy policies. The results show that providing accountability and maintaining a sustainable and trustworthy customer relationship are the key drivers for this move and focusing on user-centered data practices that enables more active user participation in this scenario is the prescribed method for this shift. The call for interdisciplinary involvement to help cater to the technological, legal, regulatory and ethical demands of this move are also highlighted.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2017
            July 2017
            : 1-6
            Affiliations
            [0001]University of Nottingham

            Nottingham, UK
            [0002]BBC Research and Development

            MediaCity, UK
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.12
            b74ce35f-e89c-4daf-a877-cbda2c4b134d
            © Sailaja et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of British HCI 2017 – Digital Make-Believe. Sunderland, UK.

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Proceedings of the 31st International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI 2017)
            HCI
            31
            Sunderland, UK
            3 - 6 July 2017
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            digital make-believe, with delegates considering our expansive
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.12
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            Privacy,Workshop,Ideals,Industry,Barriers,Attitudes,Privacy policy

            reference

            1. (Ec) 2011 SPECIAL EUROBAROMETER 359 Attitudes on Data Protection and Electronic Identity in the European Union 330 Available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm

            2. 2004 Privacy attitudes and privacy behavior Economics of Information Security 165 178

            3. Human Data Interaction : Historical Lessons from Social Studies and CSCW ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19-23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway 3 21

            4. 2012 Necessary but not sufficient: Standardized mechanisms for privacy notice and choice J. on Telecomm. & High Tech. L. Available at http://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/jtelhtel10&section=22 September 16 2016

            5. 2006 User interfaces for privacy agents ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 13 2 135 178

            6. Home Page of EU GDPR Available at http://www.eugdpr.org/

            7. European Commission 2012 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation)(2012) 11 final, 2012/0011 (COD) Brussels 11 118

            8. European Parliament & European Commission 1995 Directive 1995/46/EC on protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data on the free movement of such data Official Journal of the European Communities L281/31 31 39

            9. Federal Trade Commission, Protecting Consumer Privacy | Federal Trade Commission Available at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/media-resources/protecting-consumer-privacy January 11 2017

            10. 2001 Cultural Probes- Probing People for Design Inspiration SIGCHI. DK

            11. et al 2007 Noticing notice: a large-scale experiment on the timing of software SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’07 607

            12. et al 2002 Probing the Probes PDC June 42 50

            13. 2012 Consumer data privacy in a networked world: A framework for protecting privacy and promoting innovation in the global digital economy White House, Washington, DC 1 62

            14. et al 2009 A“nutrition label” for privacy Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security SOUPS 09 1990 1 Available at http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1572532.1572538

            15. et al 2010 Visual vs. compact Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’10 1111 Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1753326.1753492

            16. 2008 The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies I/S - A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 4 3 1 22

            17. et al 2013 Human-Data Interaction : The Human Face of the Data-Driven Society

            18. 2004 Wash. L. Rev., 101 139 Available at http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/washlr79&section=16

            19. Layered Policy Design | TRUSTe Available at http://www.truste.com/blog/2011/05/20/layered-policy-and-short-notice-design/ January 11 2017

            20. et al 2008 A user study of the expandable grid applied to P3P privacy policy visualization Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, Mountain V(Xml) 45 54 Available at http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1456413

            21. 2012 The Vaue of our Digital Identity Liberty Global Policy Series Available at http://www.lgi.com/PDF/public-policy/The-Value-of-Our-Digital-Identity.pdf

            22. et al 2015 A Design Space for Effective Privacy Notices Eleventh Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2015) 1 17

            23. World Economic Forum & Boston Consulting Group 2012 Rethinking Personal Data : Strengthening Trust May 1 35

            24. Zynga 2011 PrivacyVille Available at https://www.zynga.com/privacy/privacyville

            Comments

            Comment on this article