469
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    4
    shares
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Web-Based Interactive Tool to Support Shared Decision-Making in the Choice of Treatment for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

      proceedings-article

      1

      Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI)

      Human Computer Interaction Conference

      4 - 6 July 2018

      Pancreatic cancer, decision aid, mixed methods research, web-based interactive tool, shared decision-making, human-centred design

      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Pancreatic cancer currently has no cure in its advanced stage and often, systemic chemotherapy is used to improve survival and quality of life of patients. Chemotherapy treatments are available with varying degrees of benefits, harms, and uncertainties, and patients need to be aware of these characteristics and make informed choices or decide whether to avoid chemotherapy altogether. Web-based tools may help patients in making this informed choice with the help of their clinicians and relatives. Therefore, the aim of the study is to investigate the potential of a web-based interactive tool to support shared decision-making in the choice of treatment for people with advanced pancreatic cancer. A four-phase mixed methods paradigm has been adopted for the study. Participants will be clinicians (oncologists, clinical nurse specialists), people diagnosed with advanced (inoperable) pancreatic cancer, and relatives who support these patients. The first phase of the study identified 60 relevant citations on advanced pancreatic cancer treatment from four electronic databases from 1997 to 2018.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2018
            July 2018
            : 1-7
            Affiliations
            [0001]Bournemouth University Bournemouth, United Kingdom
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.206
            609d9571-5c5a-4f38-860a-3196950d03dd
            © Ezeh. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of British HCI 2018. Belfast, UK.

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference
            HCI
            32
            Belfast, UK
            4 - 6 July 2018
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Human Computer Interaction Conference
            Product
            Product Information: 1477-9358BCS Learning & Development
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            REFERENCES

            1. 2016 Locally Advanced, Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Journal Of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal Of The American Society Of Clinical Oncology 34 22 2654 2668

            2. 2013 Principles of biomedical ethics New York Oxford University Press

            3. 1996 SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale Usability evaluation in industry 189 194 4 7

            4. 1997 Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango) Social science & medicine 44 5 681 692

            5. 1999 Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model Social science & medicine 49 5 651 661

            6. 2011 Making shared decision-making a reality: no decision about me, without me, King’s Fund

            7. 2013 A systematic development process for patient decision aids BMC medical informatics and decision making 13 2 S2

            8. 2017 Designing and conducting mixed methods research Los Angeles SAGE 2017

            9. Laethem, 2015 Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann Oncol 26 Suppl 5 v56-68

            10. 2000 Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices British Journal of General Practice 50 460 892-+

            11. 2009 Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions Implementation Science 4 1 75

            12. 2011 How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map Patient education and counseling 82 2 260 265

            13. 2010 Implementing shared decision making in the NHS British Medical Journal 341

            14. 2016 More deaths from pancreatic cancer than breast cancer in the EU by 2017 Acta Oncol 55 9-10 1158 1160

            15. 1987 Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research New England Journal of Medicine,(th July)

            16. 2014 What is human centred design? The Design Journal 17 4 606 623

            17. 2013 Informed Decision Making for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Considering Chemotherapy: Development and Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Aid for Patients, Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa

            18. 2013 Delivering patient decision aids on the Internet: definitions, theories, current evidence, and emerging research areas BMC medical informatics and decision making 13 2 S13

            19. 1997 Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions Annals of internal medicine 127 1 1 12

            20. La Cruz, 2013 Concepts and definitions for “supportive care,”“best supportive care,”“palliative care,” and “hospice care” in the published literature, dictionaries, and textbooks. Supportive Care in Cancer 21 3 659 685

            21. 2016 Pancreatic cancer Lancet 388 10039 73 85

            22. 2008 Enhancing treatment decision-making: pilot study of a treatment decision aid in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer Br J Cancer 98 11 1769 1773

            23. 2004 Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons Statistics in medicine 23 20 3105 3124

            24. 2002 Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons Statistics in medicine 21 16 2313 2324

            25. Vecchia and 2017 European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2017, with focus on lung cancer Ann Oncol 28 5 1117 1123

            26. 2009 Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement PLoS medicine 6 7): e1000097

            27. 1995 Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale Medical Decision Making 15 1 25 30

            28. 2004 Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids Health Affairs VAR63

            29. Office for National Statistics 2017 Cancer survival in England: adult, stage at diagnosis and childhood – patients followed up to 2016

            30. 2015 onlineDeCISion. org: a web-based decision aid for DCIS treatment Breast cancer research and treatment 154 1 181 190

            31. 2016 Decision aids can support cancer clinical trials decisions: Results of a randomized trial The oncologist 21 12 1461 1470

            32. 2011 Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10 10

            33. 2017 Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions The Cochrane Library

            34. 2008 Decision making in oncology: a review of patient decision aids to support patient participation CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 58 5 293 304

            35. Standardization IOF 2010 Ergonomics of human-system interaction: Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems, ISO

            36. 2012 Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare BMJ 344 e256

            37. 2016 Features of computer-based decision aids: systematic review, thematic synthesis, and meta-analyses Journal of medical Internet research 18 1

            38. Laethem, 2017 What treatment in 2017 for inoperable pancreatic cancers? Annals of Oncology 28 7 1473 1483

            39. 2017 Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN 15 8 1028 1061

            40. 2013 Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers BMC medical informatics and decision making 13 2 S7

            41. 2011 Pancreatic cancer Lancet 378 9791 607 620

            Comments

            Comment on this article