2,239
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    8
    shares

      Celebrating 65 years of The Computer Journal - free-to-read perspectives - bcs.org/tcj65

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Pizza HCI: Improving Medical App HCI

      proceedings-article
      ,
      Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI)
      Human Computer Interaction Conference
      4 - 6 July 2018
      Medical apps, HCI, Pizza HCI
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            HCI recognises the “sandwich” of users/interactive systems/tasks – ideally achieving effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction for the user – hence user centred design and other key methodologies of HCI. For medical apps this is not sufficient, as patient outcomes are more important than usability. We aim to stimulate discussion on the need for a new approach, we tentatively call “pizza HCI,” which emphasises the more rounded form of HCI needed to respect the patient: patient/clinician/system/clinical task/patient. Core user-centred design methods, such as think aloud, need extending into pizza HCI by greater emphasis on stakeholders than on users in isolation.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2018
            July 2018
            : 1-5
            Affiliations
            [0001]Swansea University

            Dr.-Emil-König-Str. 3

            D-69214 Eppelheim
            [0002]Swansea University

            SWANSEA, SA2 8PP
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.82
            2843ee82-26b4-447a-8508-734190ec3ced
            © Nakovics et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of British HCI 2018. Belfast, UK.

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference
            HCI
            32
            Belfast, UK
            4 - 6 July 2018
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Human Computer Interaction Conference
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.82
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            HCI,Medical apps,Pizza HCI

            References

            1. 2017 The Growing Value of Digital Health in the United Kingdom IMS Institute for healthcare Informatics

            2. 2015 Patient Adoption of MHealth, No. Use, Evidence and Remaining Barriers to Mainstream Acceptance IMS Institute for healthcare Informatics

            3. 2004 “The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK” Age and Ageing 33 3 230 235

            4. 2018 “Seven lessons for interdisciplinary research on interactive digital health interventions” DIGITAL HEALTH 4 1 13

            5. -Y., 2013 “Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating mobile health (mHealth) technology” Journal of Biomedical Informatics 46 6 1080 1087

            6. 2008 Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction 1 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK?; New York

            7. 2009 “On Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering” Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications 5600 Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin, Heidelberg 363 379

            8. 2014 GREEN PAPER on Mobile Health (“mHealth” 219 final, European Comission, Brussels

            9. 2013 “Mapping mHealth Research: A Decade of Evolution” Journal of Medical Internet Research 15 5 e95

            10. 2016 “An integrative review of the impact of mobile technologies used by healthcare professionals to support education and practice” Nursing Open 3 2 66 78

            11. 2015 “Impact of mHealth Chronic Disease Management on Treatment Adherence and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review” Journal of Medical Internet Research 17 2 e52

            12. 2016 “Reduction in wound healing times, cost of consumables and number of visits treated through the implementation of an electronic wound care system in rural Australia: Prospective study of wound healing times and cost in a rural population” International Wound Journal 13 5 945 950

            13. 2004 “The Relationship of Usability to Medical Error: An Evaluation of Errors Associated with Usability Problems in the Use of Handheld Application for Prescribing Medications” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 107 1073 1076

            14. 2010 “Electronic health record usability” Vendor Practices and Perspectives: AHRQ, James Bell Associates, The Altarum Institute, Rockville

            15. 2014 “WHAT CONCERNS USERS OF MEDICAL APPS? EXPLORING NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF MEDICAL MOBILE APPLICATIONS” Tel Aviv 17

            16. MHRA. (2017 “Human Factors and Usability Engineering - Guidance for Medical Devices Including Drug-device Combination Products” available at: http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/645862/HumanFactors_Medical-Devices_v1.0.pdf 18 January 2018

            17. NHS 2014 “App Development: An NHS Guide for Developing Mobile Healthcare Applications” NHS

            18. NHS 2017 “NHS statistics, facts and figures” NHS Statistics, Facts and Figures 14 July available at: http://www.nhsconfed.org/confed18 24 February 2018

            19. NHS 2018 “Stop the Pressure | NHS Improvement” available at: http://nhs.stopthepressure.co.uk/ 24 February 2018

            20. Patient Safety Agency 2010 “Design for patient safety - User testing in the development of medical devices” NHS available at: www.nhs.npsa.uk/design 24 February 2018

            21. NPUAP 2016 “National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) announces a change in terminology from pressure ulcer to pressure injury and updates the stages of pressure injury | The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel - NPUAP” Npuap.Org 13 April available at: http://www.npuap.org/national-pressure-ulcer-advisory-panel-npuap-announces-a-change-in-terminology-from-pressure-ulcer-to-pressure-injury-and-updates-the-stages-of-pressure-injury/ 24 February 2018

            22. 2008 “The burden of chronic wounds in the UK” Diabetic Med 14 5 S7 S85

            23. PWC 2013 Socio-Economic Impact-of-MHealth - An Assessment Report for the European Union

            24. 2011 “Mobile applications for the health sector” Washington World Bank 2

            25. 2008 “Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence in intensive care patients: a literature review” Nursing in Critical Care 13 2 71 79

            26. 2012 “A Mobile Nursing Information System Based on Human-Computer Interaction Design for Improving Quality of Nursing” Journal of Medical Systems 36 3 1139 1153

            27. 2018), „Computer Bugs in Hospitals: A New Killer‟ – IT, Cybersecurity and Risk to Patients Gresham College, Gresham College 26 February 2018

            28. 2013 “Accuracy, completeness and comprehensiveness of information on pressure ulcers recorded in the patient record: Accuracy, completeness and comprehensiveness of information on pressure ulcers” Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 27 1 84 91

            29. 2014 “Mobile health: Four emerging themes of research” Decision Support Systems 66 20 35

            30. 2012 “Issues in mHealth: Findings From Key Informant Interviews” Journal of Medical Internet Research 14 5 e129

            31. WHO 2011a Global Health and Aging No. Global Health and Aging

            32. WHO. (2011b), MHealth: New Horizons for Health through Mobile Technologies, World Health Organization, Geneva

            33. 2018 “Health expenditure per capita (current US$) | Data” The World Bank Data Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH. XPD.PCAP 24 February 2018

            34. 2015 Rapid Literature Review for National Information Board Workstream 1.2 - Final Report , No. 0.797h, Royal College of Physicians

            35. 1994 “Pressure Ulcers: A Review” Archieves of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 75 908 925

            36. 2014 “ASSESSMENT METRICS, CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES FOR MOBILE HEALTH APPS.” Issues in Information Systems 15 2

            37. 2005 “Challenges, Methodologies, and Issues in the Usability Testing of Mobile Applications” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 18 3 293 308

            Comments

            Comment on this article