853
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Studying business & IT? Drive your professional career forwards with BCS books - for a 20% discount click here: shop.bcs.org

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Usefulness Design Goals of Occupational mHealth Apps for Healthcare Workers.

      Published
      proceedings-article
      , , ,
      34th British HCI Workshop and Doctoral Consortium (HCI2021-WDC)
      Post-pandemic HCI – Living Digitally
      20th - 21st July 2021
      mHealth Apps, Occupational ill-health, Usefulness, Usability, Utility, User Experience, Healthcare Workers
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            To improve healthcare professionals health and wellbeing at work, many available effective treatments including meditation, and workplace intervention, have been developed. However, the utilisation of these interventions is still limited. Currently, various mobile health applications (mHealth Apps) exist to assist a wide range of users with different occupational health issues, such as stress, anxiety, and burnout. Despite their advantages, post-download uptake of mHealth apps by end-users remains low. Some of the reasons for this are poor usability, irrelevant or missing user-desired features, and poor user experience. This review paper explores the usefulness of mHealth Apps to support occupational ill-health in healthcare workers. To achieve this, we developed a conceptual framework that identifies relevant usability, utility, and user experience design goals that enhance the usefulness of such mHealth apps. This paper presents a review of the literature combined with a proposed framework that identifies design goals proven to be relevant or often lacking. The review shows that occupational mHealth apps rarely fit end users’ backgrounds, work contexts, and dynamics. In turn, these identified design goals will be used as assessment points with end-users in subsequent stages of our project. Expected results at the end of the project will provide an enhanced understanding of usefulness design goals that contribute to the long-term use and adoption of these apps.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2021
            : 1-7
            Affiliations
            [0001]School of Biomedical Sciences University of West London St. Mary’s Road, Ealing UK
            [0002]University of West London St. Mary’s Road, Ealing UK. ITI/Larsys, Funchal, Portugal
            [0003]School of Computing and Engineering University of West London St. Mary’s Road, Ealing UK
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/HCI2021-DC.2
            0adbd055-aee0-46bc-92b6-c8de8dc76de0
            © Yingta et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of the 34th British HCI Workshop and Doctoral Consortium 2021, UK

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            34th British HCI Workshop and Doctoral Consortium
            HCI2021-WDC
            34
            London, UK
            20th - 21st July 2021
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Post-pandemic HCI – Living Digitally
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2021-DC.2
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            mHealth Apps,Usefulness,User Experience,Usability,Utility,Healthcare Workers,Occupational ill-health

            REFERENCES

            1. 2020 ‘Elderly users’ acceptance of mHealth user interface (UI) design-based culture: the moderator role of age’ Journal on multimodal user interfaces, 14 1 49 59 [Cross Ref]

            2. 2018 ‘Design for mobile mental health: an exploratory review’ Available at: http://uwl.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlVxLSwMxEB5sT16komK1ylxFWrOvNmtVBevRS97Ckl2FqS1gu3i3-8kqSie7DkhGWZI5pvHNwBZOhLDP39CQqm0jcqdTYRNnJN1qqwjQ03RMMQIuZ1SVousqnxPzf03NcYnzjdvvtw8ar9We3oVW4l81mv7UDAc6UAnE76Z6yVfBAexuUgyh6c7JEdzqIpTuGI1mcwfgwdEsjQEN8_LD9BjNP0MRIQp2jWSKEPLpS7MVJJzkGUT6_z5yHfo6MUG-1HNP9Iqv2Scbpdai9fdgFdjuTpEjBXTghWmUwMx1VFY5yica0mQtaMA2rqw92_j706YO81HLOfD2Nc08kAutvPlm6Cqm6D2nYJdYWB

            3. 2020 ‘Burnout and somatic symptoms among frontline healthcare professionals at the peak of the Italian COVID-19 pandemic’ Psychiatry research 290 113129 [Cross Ref]

            4. 2020 ‘Serious Games for Professional Skills: The Design of an Escape Room to Explore the Possibilities of eMental Health’ ACM 31 35 [Cross Ref]

            5. 1997 ‘Towards viable, useful and usable human factors design guidance’ Applied ergonomics 28 5 311 322 [Cross Ref]

            6. 2019 ‘Current Knowledge and Adoption of Mobile Health Apps Among Australian General Practitioners: Survey Study’ JMIR mHealth and uHealth 7 6 e13199 e13199 [Cross Ref]

            7. 2020 ‘Ordinary User Experiences at Work: A Study of Greenhouse Growers’ ACM transactions on computer-human interaction, 27 3 1 31 [Cross Ref]

            8. 2020 ‘A Pilot Evaluation of a Smartphone Application for Workplace Depression’ International journal of environmental research and public health 17 18 6753 [Cross Ref]

            9. 1989 ‘Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology’ MIS quarterly, 13 3 319 340 [Cross Ref]

            10. 2015 ‘Perspectives on the evolution of mobile (mHealth) technologies and application to rehabilitation’ Physical therapy 95 3 397

            11. 2019 ‘Use of Mobile Health (mHealth) Technologies and Interventions Among Community Health Workers Globally: A Scoping Review’ Health promotion practice, 20 6 805 817 [Cross Ref]

            12. . 2016 ‘m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review’ Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 23 1 212 220 [Cross Ref]

            13. Hse.gov.uk 2021 Health and safety statistics Available at: https://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/> 12 May 2021

            14. 2020 ‘Supporting the well-being of healthcare workers during and after COVID-19’ Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) 70 [Cross Ref]

            15. 2018 ‘Evaluating an mHealth App for Health and Well-Being at Work: Mixed-Method Qualitative Study’ JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6 3 e72 e72 [Cross Ref]

            16. 2007 ‘Factors Influencing Expectations of e-Health Services within a Direct-Effects Model of User Satisfaction’ E-service journal 5 2 85 112 [Cross Ref]

            17. 2020 ‘Prevalence and predictors of PTSS during COVID-19 outbreak in China hardesthit areas: Gender differences matter’ Psychiatry research 287 112921 [Cross Ref]

            18. 2014 ‘What does it mean for a system to be useful?: an exploratory study of usefulness’ ACM 885 894 [Cross Ref]

            19. 2020 Clinical or gimmickal: The use and effectiveness of mobile mental health apps for treating anxiety and depression, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1 [Cross Ref]

            20. 2012 ‘Exploring goal-setting, rewards, self-monitoring, and sharing to motivate physical activity’ 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops. IEEE 25 32 [Cross Ref]

            21. 1994 ‘Usability inspection methods’ Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems 413 414

            22. 2007 ‘An Approach to the Evaluation of Usefulness as a Social Construct Using Technological Frames’ International journal of human-computer interaction 22 1–2 153 172 [Cross Ref]

            23. 2015 ‘Healthcare workers’ perceptions and experiences on using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis’ Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2015 11 [Cross Ref]

            24. 2010 ‘Mental well-being at the workplace’ Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine 14 3 63 65 [Cross Ref]

            25. 2020 ‘Work Stress in NHS Employees: A Mixed-Methods Study’ International journal of environmental research and public health 17 18 6464 [Cross Ref]

            26. 2011 ‘Intervention-engagement and its role in the effectiveness of stage-matched interventions promoting physical exercise’ Research in sports medicine (Print), 19 3 145 161 [Cross Ref]

            27. 2016 ‘Usability of Commercially Available Mobile Applications for Diverse Patients’ Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 31 12 1417 1426 [Cross Ref]

            28. 2016 ‘A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps)’ Journal of biomedical informatics 60 Journal Article 243 251 [Cross Ref]

            29. 2018 ‘Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements’ Evidence-based mental health, 21 3 116 119

            30. 2018 ‘Changing Diet and Physical Activity in Nurses: A Pilot Study and Process Evaluation Highlighting Challenges in Workplace Health Promotion’ Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 50 10 1015 1025 [Cross Ref]

            31. 2019 ‘The Continued Use of Mobile Health Apps: Insights From a Longitudinal Study’ JMIR mHealth and uHealth 7 8 e12983 e12983 [Cross Ref]

            32. 2019 ‘Principles for the design of digital occupational health systems’ Information and Organization 29 2 77 90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.005

            33. 2012 ‘Review of health information technology usability study methodologies’ Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 19 3 413 422 [Cross Ref]

            34. 2021 ‘Perceptions of Mobile Health Apps and Features to Support Psychosocial Wellbeing Among Frontline Health Care Workers Involved in the COVID-19 Pandemic Response: Qualitative Study’ Journal of medical Internet research 23 5 e26282 [Cross Ref]

            Comments

            Comment on this article