The objective of the study is to compare a smartphone AR self-learning application with a non-AR smartphone app teaching tool to see which one will more effectively support veterinary students’ selflearning. To achieve this, participants will install a mobile application and use it as a self-learning support tool. Feedback will be obtained via a System Usability Scale (SUS) survey in the app at the end. But beyond this common questionnaire, the study will compare the training efficiency and training effectiveness between the AR mode and non-AR mode, exploring the impact on student’s learning motivation and knowledge acquisition. This will be achieved by leveraging the remote nature of the experiment by recording the time taken within the application and future results of the participants who are Veterinary medicine undergraduate and postgraduate students from a university in Ireland and a veterinary medical university in UK.
J Brooke 1996 ‘Sus: a “quick and dirty’usability’, Usability evaluation in industry 189
R ChristJ GuevarM PoyadeP. M Rea 2018 ‘Proof of concept of a workflow methodology for the creation of basic canine head anatomy veterinary education tool using augmented reality’ PloS one 13 4 e0195866
A. M CoddB Choudhury 2011 ‘Virtual reality anatomy: Is it comparable with traditional methods in the teaching of human forearm musculoskeletal anatomy?’ Anatomical sciences education 4 3 119 125
K. E McCoolS. A BissettT. L HillL. A DegernesE. C Hawkins 2020 ‘Evaluation of a human virtual-reality endoscopy trainer for teaching early endoscopy skills to veterinarians’ Journal of veterinary medical education 47 1 106 116
I. I MitroffL. V Blankenship 1973 ‘On the methodology of the holistic experiment: An approach to the conceptualization of large-scale social experiments’ Technological forecasting and social change 4 4 339 353
C. L TheoretÉ.-N CarmelS Bernier 2007 ‘Why dissection videos should not replace cadaver prosections in the gross veterinary anatomy curriculum: Results from a comparative study’ Journal of veterinary medical education 34 2 151 156
P XibertaI Boada 2019 ‘Ivet, an interactive veterinary education tool’ Journal of animal science 97 2 932 944
X XuD KilroyE ManginaA. G Campbell 2020 Work-in-progress—adapting a virtual reality anatomy teaching tool for mobility: Pilot study ‘2020 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN)’, IEEE 328 331
X XuE ManginaD KilroyA KumarA. G Campbell 2018 Delaying when all dogs to go to heaven: virtual reality canine anatomy education pilot study ‘2018 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM)’, IEEE 1 9
X XuX PanA. G Campbell 2020 Arls: An asymmetrical remote learning system for sharing anatomy between an hmd and a light field display ‘26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology’ 1 2
Y. C ZhaoG KennedyK YukawaB PymanS O’Leary 2011 ‘Can virtual reality simulator be used as a training aid to improve cadaver temporal bone dissection? results of a randomized blinded control trial’ The Laryngoscope 121 4 831 837