+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      The Art of Voting


      Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2015) (EVA)

      Electronic Visualisation and the Arts

      7 & 9 July 2015

      Ubermorgen.com, Vote swapping, Tactical media, New media art, Freedom of expression, Law, Democracy, Elections



            Digital and online technologies are not only used by insurgent social movements to disseminate information in innovative ways but are also generative of distinctive forms in which activist groups may be organised. Social networking sites introduced widespread and effective strategic voting in the United States of America’s Presidential election of 2000. The aim of these sites was to enable voters in different states to swap votes. In 2007 a federal appeals court decided that at least one form of these vote-swapping sites were constitutionally protected. Online vote swapping has since been advocated or has occurred in other countries around the world, including Canada and the United Kingdom. Even more controversially, ‘Voteauction’ by Ubermorgen.com was a website asserting it enabled individuals to buy and sell their votes in the 2000 Presidential election in the United States of America. Ubermorgen.com declared the work legal art after it was shut down before voting took place. These political actions brought into question the politics of electoral boundaries. ‘Voteauction’ invited those who encountered it to focus on how legal systems structure the democratic mandates of nation-states and reflect on the implications of real-time technologies for the way in which the law regulates society.


            Author and article information

            July 2015
            July 2015
            : 171-175
            [0001]Independent Scholar

            London, UK
            © Jeremy Pilcher Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of EVA London 2015, UK

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2015)
            London, UK
            7 & 9 July 2015
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Electronic Visualisation and the Arts
            Product Information: 1477-9358BCS Learning & Development
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Electronic Workshops in Computing


            1. 2000 Selling Votes or Peddling Lies? Wired http://archive.wired.com/politics/law/news/2000/10/39770?currentPage=all 19 03 2015

            2. 1996 Derrida and the Political Routledge London

            3. 1993 Spectres of Marx Routledge New York

            4. 2002 Nietzsche and the Machine. Negotiations Stanford Stanford University Press

            5. 2000 Vote Buying California Law Review 88 5 1323 1371

            6. 2001 Technologies of Protest: Insurgent Social Movements and the First Amendment in the Era of the Internet University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150 1 119 171

            7. 2001 Derrida and Literature. Jacques Derrida and the Humanities Cambridge Cambridge University Press

            8. 2005 ‘Voteauction’.net: Protected Political Speech or Treason? Journal of High Technology Law 5 357 380

            9. 2009 Ubermorgen.com. The Future is Now. Ubermorgen.com FPeditions Brescia

            10. 2004 In Defense of Vote Buying: How ‘ Nader Traders’ Can Defeat Rent Seeking Hamline Journal of Public Law & Policy 26 43 1 29

            11. 2001 Vote-Swapping Over the Internet: Free Speech or Voter Corruption? Hastings Communication & Entertainment Law Journal 24 Fall 149 167

            12. 2007 Internet Vote-Swapping Legal, Says 9th Circuit Wired http://www.wired.com/2007/08/internet-vote-s/ 19 03 2015

            13. Ubermorgen.com http://www.vote-auction.net/ 19 03 2015

            14. 2001 Nader’s Traders vs. State Regulators: Examining the Controversy over Internet Vote Swapping in the 2000 Presidential Election North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology 2 1 32 66


            Comment on this article